Skip to main content

Old bias, new excuses: How western media misrepresents India’s anti-terror strikes

By Gajanan Khergamker 
The recent Indian military strikes on Pakistan, dubbed Operation Sindoor, have sparked a storm of international media coverage. Several prominent outlets have portrayed India as the aggressor in the escalating conflict, raising concerns over biased reporting. This commentary critiques coverage by foreign media outlets such as The New York Times, Reuters, BBC, and CNN, which have often been accused of framing India’s actions as escalatory while downplaying or omitting critical context regarding Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism. By examining historical patterns and current geopolitical dynamics, this analysis highlights the recurring selective framing, omission of evidence, and a tendency to favor narratives aligned with Western geopolitical interests over factual nuance.
Several foreign media reports described India’s strikes as unilateral escalations, often emphasizing alleged civilian casualties in Pakistan while downplaying the trigger: the April 22, 2025, terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 tourists, primarily Hindu men. For instance, The New York Times reported that India “struck Pakistan” in response to the attack, framing the operation as aggression without adequately noting India’s claim that the strikes targeted “terrorist infrastructure” linked to groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Similarly, CNN highlighted Pakistan’s claims of civilian deaths, including children, but gave less prominence to India’s assertion that the strikes were “focused and precise,” targeting only terror camps.
This selective framing is not new. During the 2019 Balakot airstrike, following the Pulwama attack that killed 40 Indian paramilitary personnel, outlets like BBC and Al Jazeera questioned the efficacy of India’s strikes, emphasizing Pakistan’s narrative that no significant damage had occurred, while minimizing India’s evidence of having struck JeM facilities. BBC’s coverage leaned heavily on Pakistan’s guided tour of an undamaged madrasa, without scrutinizing why media access was delayed for 43 days—ample time for sanitization. Such tendencies to amplify Pakistan’s denials while doubting India’s claims reflect a consistent bias that favors skepticism toward Indian actions over Pakistan’s well-documented support for militants.
Another recurring problem in foreign media coverage is the reluctance to highlight Pakistan’s longstanding support for terrorist groups operating in Kashmir. India has consistently accused Pakistan of providing safe havens to groups like JeM and LeT—charges supported by international bodies. For instance, the United Nations designated JeM’s founder Masood Azhar a global terrorist in 2019. Yet, media outlets rarely explore Pakistan’s failure to act against such individuals. In the current crisis, Reuters and NBC News reported Pakistan’s denial of involvement in the Pahalgam attack but failed to meaningfully examine India’s evidence pointing to the “clear involvement of Pakistan-based terrorists.”
This omission mirrors historical coverage of the 2008 Mumbai attacks, in which LeT operatives killed 166 people. While India provided evidence linking Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) to the attackers, outlets like The Guardian and The Washington Post initially treated the attack as a bilateral dispute, only shifting tone after mounting international pressure. This tendency to equivocate may stem from broader Western strategic considerations—particularly during the Cold War and post-9/11 eras, when Pakistan was a key Western ally in Afghanistan.
While some posts on X accuse outlets like BBC, CNN, and RT of favoring India’s narrative, the opposite is often true. The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism has noted that Western media often adopt a “narrow nationalism” in India-Pakistan conflicts, framing India as the aggressor in line with liberal critiques of its Hindu-nationalist government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This was evident in 2019, when The New York Times editorialized India’s revocation of Kashmir’s autonomy as “dangerous and wrong,” predicting “certain bloodshed” without acknowledging Pakistan’s role in fomenting insurgency. Such narratives overlook the complex history of Kashmir, including Pakistan’s invasion of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947, which triggered the first Indo-Pak war.
Western media bias is further exacerbated by a lack of on-ground reporting. Outlets often rely on stringers or secondary sources based in Pakistan, where access to conflict zones is tightly controlled. During the Balakot crisis, Reuters journalists were denied independent access to the strike site, yet their reports leaned on Pakistan’s narrative of minimal damage. In contrast, Indian media—though sometimes accused of jingoism—often present detailed reports based on local intelligence, which are frequently dismissed as state propaganda by Western outlets.
The roots of this bias can be traced to historical Western attitudes. During the Cold War, the U.S. and U.K. viewed Pakistan as a bulwark against Soviet influence, arming and supporting it while overlooking its growing ties to extremist groups. Meanwhile, India’s non-aligned and socialist stance under leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru led to portrayals of India as uncooperative or pro-Soviet. This legacy continues in today’s media narratives, which subtly tilt in favor of Pakistan. For example, during the 1965 war, Western media framed India’s defensive actions as aggressive, glossing over Pakistan’s attempt to seize Kashmir.
Similarly, during the 1999 Kargil conflict, The Times (UK) and others focused on India’s military response while underreporting Pakistan’s infiltration across the Line of Control, which sparked the crisis. That same tendency is visible today, with outlets like BBC emphasizing Pakistan’s call for a “neutral investigation” into the Pahalgam attack without questioning its failure to dismantle known terror networks.
This bias has real-world implications. By emphasizing unverified claims—like Pakistan’s assertion of shooting down five Indian jets—and focusing heavily on civilian casualties without confirmation, media outlets risk amplifying disinformation. This recalls the 2019 Balakot crisis, where satellite analysis by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute found no significant structural damage, yet Indian claims were dismissed without equal scrutiny of Pakistan’s denials.
Furthermore, foreign media often ignore India’s strategic restraint in its military operations. India’s 2016 surgical strikes and the 2019 airstrikes were deliberately limited to avoid breaching Pakistan’s nuclear threshold. Yet, this calibrated response is rarely acknowledged, and India is frequently portrayed as reckless.
In sum, the foreign media’s coverage of India’s recent strikes reveals a pattern of bias rooted in selective framing, omission of Pakistan’s role in terrorism, and a historical Western preference for Pakistan as a strategic ally. Outlets like The New York Times, Reuters, BBC, and CNN have often failed to provide balanced, well-contextualized reporting—echoing past biases seen in Balakot, Mumbai, and Kargil. This skewed narrative not only distorts global understanding but also undermines efforts to address the core issue: Pakistan’s continued support for militancy. To ensure fairer journalism, foreign media must invest in on-ground reporting, engage seriously with India’s evidence, and reflect critically on their own geopolitical assumptions. Until then, their coverage risks perpetuating misinformation that inflames tensions instead of clarifying them.
#OperationSindoor #MediaMatters #IndiaRighter #Pahalgam
---
A version of this article was first published in The Draft

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”