Skip to main content

BJP rulers are "helping" business houses at the cost of public sector units

By Syed Basharat*
Developments over the last four years suggest that the BJP's rise was largely due to the support it got from a conglomerate of corporate houses such as Ambanis, Tatas etc. More recent developments also show that there that the Government of India (GoI) is simultaneously making an all-out effort to undermine public sector units (PSUs) by selling or privatizing profitable production units.
In fact, one finds that the party in power, as part of its preparations for the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, is increasingly asking corporate houses to take up all that the PSUs are doing. The opposition Congress, taking a political view of this development, considers this as corruption of the highest order. In June 2018, it issued what it called “BJP & Corruption: A saga of the last four years”, where it alleges that corruption has increased under the Modi government.
A Congress statement read:
“Almost five years have passed since the Narendra Modi government assumed power. One of the biggest promises of the PM prior to his election was bringing down corruption in India. ‘Na Khaunga, Na Khane Dunga’, the PM had proclaimed. He had promised to be the 'chowkidar' of the nation for 60 months to protect national wealth. The extremely ham-handed decision of demonetisation wiped out 86% of the currency, jobs, and even about 100 lives.”
Notably, one finds that the Modi government is starting to suffer a setback. The CMS-India Corruption Study 2018, which covered 13 states (including six which are ruled by the BJP) and 11 public services, concluded that 75% of Indian households think that that the level of the corruption in public service has either increased or remained the same during the last 12 months.
While 38% of households across India felt that the level of corruption has increased, another 37% of households felt that the level of corruption in public services has remained the same as before. Then, 27% of households said they experienced corruption at least once while availing any one of the 11 public services covered in the report. The number of the people who doubt Narendra Modi’s commitment to fight corruption in public life has increased in 2018.
“Perception about Union Government’s commitment to reduce corruption in public services has seen a decline from 41% in 2017 to 31% in 2018,” the survey report says, emphasising that people in even BJP-ruled states have begun to doubt Modi government’s commitment to contain corruption.
The Rafale deal appears to have contributed hugely. People are beginning to see how the state-owned HAL was bypassed for a private entity in a scam that cost Rs 1,30,000 crore. A deal was signed by the Modi government to purchase 36 Rafale jets at a rate much higher than what was negotiated by the UPA government.
The Modi government has, ironically, refused to make public the price of the aircraft, saying a secrecy clause exists b etween India and France. However, this secrecy clause only binds India from revealing the technical specifications and operational capabilities of the aircraft, and not the price. French manufacturer Dassault has already released the total price of 36 aircraft, which is about Rs 60,000 crore.
This makes the per aircraft price to be Rs 1,660 crore, as against Rs 526, as negotiated by the UPA. The UPA’s price included transfer of technology (ToT), and the state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) was to make 108 aircraft. Under the new deal, there is no ToT, and HAL, which has a good record in defence production, was superseded by Reliance Aerospace owned by Anil Ambani. Also, as pefr Dassault Aviation’s Annual Report, Qatar and Egypt brought the same aircraft at Rs 1,319 crore. No prior approval of the Cabinet Committee on Security committee was sought.
There should have been only one reason for buying 36 aircraft, and that is if you are using it as a nuclear delivery platform. It has been argued that Rafale is being bought as a nuclear delivery platform. But even here, India has much better nuclear delivery options. If there was a requirement it could have modified the Bhramos missile to deliver nuclear weapons and launch those from Sukhoi-30.
According to an RTI filed by Ramvir Tanwar in 2018,the BJP spent Rs 2,221.11 crore on advertising through electronic media. Recently , the "Economic Times" reported that BJP ads ranked number one across all channels in the five states which went to assembly elections – Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Telangana and Mizoram.
The Narendra Modi government has spent about Rs 5,000 crore on advertising during his tenure of nea rly four-and-a-half years, which is equal to the Manmohan Singh government spending in the ten years it was in power. To meet the increasing advertising costs of BJP, the Modi government is resorting to different ways of corruption.
---
*Political observer, can be reached at syed.basharat11@gmail.com

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.