Skip to main content

Rethinking feminism: Should men’s rights be part of the equality agenda?

By Raqif Makhdoomi 
“Be a man. Men don’t cry. Face it like a man.” Phrases like these are often heard in families, workplaces, and public life. While they may appear harmless, they reflect deep-seated expectations that restrict men from expressing vulnerability or seeking emotional support. Many men internalise their problems rather than speak openly, fearing ridicule or judgement. In recent times, an increasing number of voices argue that men are being socially cornered and expected to remain silent simply because they are men.
Feminism originally emerged as a movement for equality, intended to secure fair opportunities and rights for women and to remove structural discrimination. However, some critics argue that contemporary public discourse has drifted from the principle of equality into confrontation and generalisation. They point out that in certain cases, men have been portrayed negatively as a category, which they believe is neither constructive nor aligned with the spirit of equality. 
For example, campaigns such as #MeToo played an important role in enabling survivors to speak about abuse and exploitation, but critics highlight that false allegations—though statistically fewer—can cause irreversible reputational and emotional damage when they occur. In several instances, men acquitted after such claims receive no public apology or restoration of dignity.
Concerns have also been raised regarding social norms that appear inconsistent. A woman shouting at a man may at times be publicly celebrated as empowerment, while a man raising his voice is often condemned as abusive or oppressive. Similarly, physical aggression by women can be dismissed lightly, whereas men are harshly judged for the same behaviour. These double standards fuel resentment and do not contribute to harmonious gender relations.
A frequently discussed issue in India involves misuse of certain legal provisions. The Supreme Court of India has expressed concern about the misuse of Section 498A of the IPC (criminalising cruelty in marriage), observing that the law is sometimes used to settle personal scores rather than protect genuine victims. According to NCRB data, thousands of cases have been found to be false or unsubstantiated, raising the need for balanced reforms that protect both women and men.
Another serious concern is the rate of male suicides. Although men are often perceived as emotionally stronger, data from the National Crime Records Bureau shows that men constitute a significantly higher percentage of suicide victims—about 72% in 2021 and 70% in 2020. Many mental-health professionals argue that rigid expectations of masculinity and the stigma around seeking help contribute to this imbalance.
There are also social expectations placed primarily on men—such as financial responsibility, employment prerequisites for marriage, and family pressure—which rarely form part of public discourse. While legitimate and harmful discrimination against women continues to exist and needs consistent attention, ignoring the emotional and psychological needs of men can also damage societal well-being. Issues like dowry, domestic violence, gender bias at work, and access to public spaces affect both genders and need thoughtful solutions rather than hostility.
Relationships, too, are not free from dual blame. Infidelity, conflicts, and failures cannot be attributed to one gender alone. Any discussion of equality must recognise responsibility on both sides.
A society grounded in fairness must create space for every individual to speak without fear. Advocating for men’s issues should not be interpreted as opposition to women’s rights, just as supporting women’s equality should not imply belittling men. True equality lies in ensuring dignity and justice for everyone.
Men, like women, have emotions, vulnerabilities, and human needs. Hearing and acknowledging their struggles is essential. Constructive dialogue, not competition between genders, is the path to genuine social progress.
---
Raqif Makhdoomi is a law student and rights activist

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan   The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution. 

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.