Skip to main content

How INDIA lost Bihar: Vote splits and alliance mismanagement

By Jubil Das, Sandeep Pandey 
Since the rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party, many secular and progressive individuals worry, before every election, about the division of secular votes. They urge secular parties to form alliances and field a single candidate against BJP or the National Democratic Alliance (NDA). However, this rarely materialises fully, and BJP eventually benefits from the split in votes among its opponents. Some opposition parties are even accused of indirectly helping BJP by contributing to this vote division.
Several analyses are being presented for the NDA’s spectacular victory in Bihar. NDA won 83% of the seats with less than half of the total vote share. In contrast, the party with the largest vote share—Rashtriya Janata Dal, with 1,15,46,055 votes (23%)—won only 10% of the seats. NDA secured 202 seats, while INDIA managed to win a mere 35.
This article does not examine the effect of the Rs. 10,000 payment to women before polling, the voting pattern of Extremely Backward Classes, or the appeal of INDIA’s jobs-in-every-family promise. Instead, we look quantitatively at how the alliance arithmetic worked and what might have been possible with a stronger alliance.
The NDA alliance remained solid, with only one seat—Marhaura—where it had no candidate. INDIA lacked candidates on three seats: Sugauli, Kusheshwar Asthan and Mohania. After its nomination was rejected, INDIA belatedly supported Ravi Shankar Paswan in Mohania, where he finished second.
While NDA partners did not contest against one another on any of the remaining 242 seats, INDIA partners fielded candidates against each other on 11 out of 240 seats (about 4.5%): Gaura Bauram, Kahalgaon, Kargahar, Narkatiaganj, Raja Pakar, Sikandra, Sultanganj, Vaishali, Bachhwara, Bihar Sharif, Chainpur and Beldaur. NDA won all of these. The Communist Party of India candidate directly caused the defeat of the Congress candidate in Bachhwara. The main partners, RJD and Congress, failed to achieve consensus and contested against each other in five seats, while Congress fought against alliance partners in 9 of the 11 overlapping seats. These so-called “friendly fights” proved self-defeating. Bachhwara, effectively gifted to NDA, should continue to haunt INDIA.
On at least two seats—Gobindpur and Parihar—INDIA likely lost due to rebel candidates, indicating poor candidate selection.
Had INDIA worked more seriously on alliance management, chosen candidates carefully, attempted to include parties previously aligned such as the Bahujan Samaj Party and Aam Aadmi Party, and reached out to Azad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram) and All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen—who share much of the same vote base—the alliance could potentially have added around 25 seats. AIMIM alone could have contributed about 10 seats. Bringing in Jan Suraj Party could have increased the tally by about 54. Prashant Kishor would likely have leaned towards INDIA, despite Jan Suraj damaging INDIA more than NDA. Jan Suraj acted as spoiler on 18 seats for INDIA and 13 for NDA.
But INDIA’s alliance managers failed to build a broader and cohesive front, and the resulting vote split left RJD, Congress and CPI (Marxist-Leninist) in a weakened state. The steep reduction in CPI(ML) seats is particularly surprising, given its strong grassroots support and performance in the last assembly election.
Well-wishers of secular unity should advise the Congress to act more responsibly. If it repeats the indiscipline seen in Bihar—contesting 9 seats against its own partners—the alliance will be taken even less seriously. Congress has a greater stake in the national alliance than any other partner. Progressive forces must persuade secular parties within INDIA to work cohesively so that BJP cannot take advantage of vote division. NDA has clarity in its strategy, whereas INDIA appeared confused and unable to finalise seat-sharing even after the first phase of nominations closed.
---
The authors are associated with the Socialist Party (India)

Comments

TRENDING

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan  In a groundbreaking  study  spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram  India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah  Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu.  He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra  Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby , the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today. 

UP tribal woman human rights defender Sokalo released on bail

By  A  Representative After almost five months in jail, Adivasi human rights defender and forest worker Sokalo Gond has been finally released on bail.Despite being granted bail on October 4, technical and procedural issues kept Sokalo behind bars until November 1. The Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) and the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP), which are backing Sokalo, called it a "major victory." Sokalo's release follows the earlier releases of Kismatiya and Sukhdev Gond in September. "All three forest workers and human rights defenders were illegally incarcerated under false charges, in what is the State's way of punishing those who are active in their fight for the proper implementation of the Forest Rights Act (2006)", said a CJP statement.

May the Earth Be Auspicious: Vedic ecology and contemporary crisis in Ashok Vajpeyi’s poetry

By Ravi Ranjan*  Ashok Vajpeyi, born in 1941, occupies a singular position in contemporary Hindi poetry as a poet whose work quietly but decisively reorients modern literary consciousness toward ethical, ecological, and civilizational questions. Across more than six decades of writing, Vajpeyi has forged a poetic idiom marked by restraint, philosophical attentiveness, and moral seriousness, resisting both rhetorical excess and ideological simplification. 

Would breaking idols, burning books annihilate caste? Recalling a 1972 Dalit protest

By Rajiv Shah  A few days ago, I received an email alert from a veteran human rights leader who has fought many battles in Gujarat for the Dalit cause — both through ground-level campaigns and courtroom struggles. The alert, sent in Gujarati by Valjibhai Patel, who heads the Council for Social Justice, stated: “In 1935, Babasaheb Ambedkar burnt the Manusmriti . In 1972, we broke the idol of Krishna , whom we regarded as the creator of the varna (caste) system.”