Bridging the climate finance gap, from global pledges to local realities

By Aditya Verghese

The recent devastation caused by —87,000 hectares of cropland submerged, along with collapsed bridges, culverts, and roads across —has once again underscored the mounting threat of climate-related disasters. Similar scenes unfolded in , where displaced thousands and damaged critical infrastructure, and across , where and Bualoi left hundreds dead and thousands homeless. These events form a sobering pattern: climate-driven extreme weather will continue to intensify, disproportionately impacting those already living on the margins.

Despite the billions pledged under , the most vulnerable communities remain underprepared, uninsured, and inadequately protected. Funds committed through international agreements move slowly, often constrained by bureaucracy and stringent eligibility requirements. As a result, informal workers, small farmers, and low-income coastal or urban households rarely experience direct benefits from these flows of finance.

This global debate will surface prominently in , building on the pledge by developed nations to mobilise at least $300 billion by 2035. Negotiators are expected to endorse the ‘’, which aims to raise $1.3 trillion per year by 2035. Yet the real challenge is not only mobilising finance but reshaping its structure. The current system tends to prioritise large-scale national projects, sidelining the everyday adaptation needs of households and local economies. While the adaptation agenda and the new acknowledge the importance of helping vulnerable countries cope with climate impacts, much of the conversation still revolves around frameworks and pledges rather than practical implementation.

Bridging this gap requires reimagining how reaches the ground. Instead of merely responding to losses, we need to co-create solutions with communities and design programmes that build resilience where climate shocks are most deeply felt. A paradigm shift is needed—one that delivers not just national-level interventions but regional and community-level support. Climate-relevant social protection, such as disaster insurance, early recovery support, and adaptive local finance, remains far too uncommon.

can play an essential role in this transformation. Positioned between the state and markets, they are well placed to test innovative models, rooted in community relationships, that offer practical pathways for implementation. —combining philanthropic, private, and public capital—allows CSOs to experiment, de-risk new ideas, and build evidence that can inform broader policy scaling. In doing so, they strengthen state capacity and help ensure that global climate finance aligns with the lived realities of marginalised communities.

One example is a pilot recently launched by SEEDS: a programme for coastal communities in ’s , where repeated cyclones have inflicted sustained losses. Implemented with the New India Assurance Co. Ltd., the local non-profit and supported by philanthropic capital, the programme provides a fast and transparent financial safety net. Unlike , parametric insurance triggers payouts automatically once predetermined conditions—wind speed and proximity to a reference point—are breached. Affected households receive direct benefit transfers within three weeks, bypassing lengthy claims assessments.

Equally significant has been the emphasis on trust-building through community consultations, allowing local residents to help design the insurance triggers themselves. This participatory process ensures that the model captures local priorities and remains contextually relevant. The pilot offers a valuable opportunity for SEEDS and policymakers to evaluate whether such mechanisms can be deployed quickly, remain community-centric, and effectively address cyclone-related losses—conditions essential for wider adoption.

As climate impacts escalate, urgency is unavoidable. But urgency should not compel a retreat into standardised, universal models that overlook the diversity of lived experiences. Building resilience at scale requires an institutional ecosystem that encourages innovation and supports a range of approaches tailored to the realities of vulnerable communities. Ultimately, the question is not only how much finance is mobilised, but how imaginatively, inclusively, and effectively it is applied.

---

The author is Head, Centre of Excellence—Public Finance at the Sustainable Environment and Ecological Development Society (SEEDS)

Comments

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey* Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD * It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan* “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram* In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha* The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution.

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava* Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.

Search This Blog