Skip to main content

Govind Guru: The forgotten freedom fighter who transformed Bhil society

By Bharat Dogra 
India has a rich legacy of freedom fighters who were also exceptional social reformers. Among these, one of the most remarkable figures—though still not widely known at the national level—is Govind Guru, also known as Govindgiri. He emerged as an inspirational leader for Bhil tribal communities and several other marginalized groups of central India. The colonial rulers quickly recognized his ability to mobilize the masses against both colonial authority and feudal oppression, responding with ruthless repression that culminated in one of the biggest massacres perpetrated in India by colonial forces in the 20th century.
Visitors to Bhil villages in the tri-junction region of Rajasthan, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh are often struck by the frequent greeting “Jai Guru.” This salutation refers to Govind Guru, whose legacy continues to shape the cultural and political consciousness of these communities. His many-sided contributions—as a reformer, freedom fighter, mobilizer and lifelong advocate for justice—make him a towering figure who deserves much broader national recognition.
The memorials built in his honor at Mangarh on both the Rajasthan and Gujarat sides are important steps, but they remain insufficient compared to the scale of sacrifices made by Govind Guru and his followers. His life and work are deeply embedded in the songs, prayers and collective memory of tribal communities, and honoring this legacy is also a way of acknowledging the enormous suffering endured by Bhil communities in their struggles against feudal and colonial oppression.
Born in 1858 into a banjara (nomadic) family in the Dungarpur region of Rajasthan, Govind Guru experienced difficult early years marked by poverty. He worked as a farm laborer under exploitative conditions, and several members of his family died during a famine. Observing widespread suffering among people around him, he connected these hardships to the economic and social systems dominated by the British colonial regime and princely states. 
As a young man, he travelled across the Banswara, Sunth, Dungarpur and Panchmahal regions, building rapport with tribal communities. He also accompanied Swami Dayanand during the latter’s travels in Rajasthan, and these conversations deepened his reformist convictions.
His early reform program emphasized gender equality, giving up liquor, avoiding crime, rejecting superstitions, and promoting sustainable livelihoods and land rights. He spoke openly against the injustices inflicted by dominant castes, particularly towards women and widows, while praising egalitarian traditions among tribal populations. These views angered entrenched interests, notably liquor traders who were hostile to his growing influence.
As his thinking evolved, Govind Guru moved beyond social reform to highlight the systemic exploitation of tribal communities. His speeches increasingly critiqued the colonial regime, and he demanded protection of tribal land rights, abolition of bonded and forced labor, and recognition of the community’s right to assemble and organize. He also invoked long-standing traditions of self-rule among tribal groups, posing a growing challenge to colonial authority. This led to punitive action, including his arrest around 1912, though widespread anger among tribals forced the authorities to release him.
By this time, his movement had gained significant momentum in the regions that now border Rajasthan and Gujarat, especially in Banswara, Dungarpur and Kushalgarh. It comprised several intertwined streams. The first was a social reform movement promoting temperance, equality and hygiene, and supporting widow remarriage. His use of rituals such as the sacred fire (dhuni) was less about religious tradition and more about symbolically uniting followers during periods of intense repression. Though some accused him of ritualism, Govind Guru consistently opposed superstition.
The second stream was a democratic and civil rights movement. He repeatedly appealed for freedom of expression, assembly and peaceful gathering, but repression only intensified. He and his family members were imprisoned around 1912, reflecting the growing concern of colonial and feudal authorities about his influence.
A third stream was a peasant and workers’ movement that demanded reduced taxation, protection of tribal land rights, and the abolition of forced and bonded labor. He encouraged followers to adopt improved agricultural practices, linking economic empowerment to social and political emancipation.
Govind Guru also led relief efforts during famines and floods, encouraging even the poorest to help one another. He himself lived an austere life and refused offers that could have granted him comfort or luxury. Followers in the bhagat and samp movements were expected to lead ethical lives free of crime, theft and intoxicants.
He was a master mobilizer who built a mass movement among some of the poorest and most oppressed communities despite formidable obstacles. Over time, the social movement evolved into a freedom movement asserting the rights and sovereignty of Bhil tribal communities.
This growing radicalization led to violent confrontation with colonial forces and collaborating princely states. Govind Guru and his followers were forced to travel with modest arms for self-defense. At a gathering in Mangarh on 17 November 1913, they were encircled by British forces, who used cannons and machine guns brought up the hills with the help of donkeys and mules. Around 1,500 people—mostly Bhil tribals—are estimated to have been killed, based on oral histories and other sources, though colonial records cited much lower numbers. The massacre was one of the most brutal mass killings carried out by colonial authority in 20th century India, likely surpassing the scale of the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh tragedy.
Govind Guru was arrested along with his close associates Dhirji Punja and Punja Pargi, and all three were sentenced to life imprisonment.
Meanwhile, in the Mewar region, the movement against excessive land revenue was growing in Bijoliya and spreading to surrounding areas. Inquiries ordered by the Maharana had already confirmed the exploitative nature of taxation. The arrival of Vijay Singh Pathik gave further momentum, and his writings expanded the movement’s reach. Among those influenced by these ideas was Motilal Tejawat, a young man from Udaipur who began organizing Bhil tribals against excessive taxes and forced labor. His mobilization—known as the Eki movement—attracted thousands.
As his support grew, so did repression. Like Govind Guru earlier, Tejawat began moving with followers from place to place. In early March 1922, when about 5,000 to 10,000 people gathered at Pal Chitaria village in present-day Gujarat to hear him speak, a heavily armed colonial force launched an assault. Around 1,200 people are believed to have died. Reports suggest that, wary after the backlash to Jallianwala Bagh, British authorities tried to suppress any record of the killings. Accounts mention bodies buried in a well or lost in a riverbed. Most victims were non-locals unfamiliar with escape routes, while local supporters managed to help Tejawat flee across a hill; he avoided arrest for nearly seven years.
Some accounts claim that more than 1,000 people were again killed in Bhula and Balohiya villages in May, though evidence is limited. Repression also intensified in regions influenced by the Bijoliya movement and its offshoots.
Govind Guru, though initially sentenced to life imprisonment, was released in 1919 but barred from entering his core areas of influence. He continued his reform work until his death on October 30, 1931, at Kamboi near Limbdi in Gujarat. His associates Dhirji Punja and Punja Pargi are also revered by Bhil communities.
Today, these struggles remain alive in the collective memory of Bhil communities, who continue to cherish Govind Guru as a reformer, visionary and freedom fighter. Many villages still uphold the reform measures he advocated. The best tribute the country can pay to him is to respect tribal rights, ensure justice and dignity for these communities and acknowledge the enduring legacy of their sacrifices.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include When the Two Streams Met (freedom movement of India), Man over Machine—A Path to Peace, A Day in 2071, and Planet in Peril. All photos based on Mangarh Memorial by P.L. Patel

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan   The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.

When grief becomes grace: Kerala's quiet revolution in organ donation

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Kerala is an important model for understanding India's diversity precisely because the religious and cultural plurality it has witnessed over centuries brought together traditions and good practices from across the world. Kerala had India's first communist government, was the first state where a duly elected government was dismissed, and remains the first state to achieve near-total literacy. It is also a land where Christianity and Islam took root before they spread to Europe and other parts of the world. Kerala has deep historic rationalist and secular traditions.