Skip to main content

Breathless in Delhi: Lives lost while governments trade blame

By Sunil Kumar* 
The world today is battling the grave threat of climate change. If this crisis deepens further, it may endanger the very survival of humanity. Even imperial powers express concern—though largely to shift responsibility onto others. The United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP-30), held in Belém, Brazil from November 10–21, ended without concrete results, despite coinciding with the tenth anniversary of the Paris Agreement. India strongly argued that developed nations should not expect developing countries to compensate for their own failures, since they are the historical and primary contributors to carbon emissions. This was precisely why countries like the United States chose not to participate.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi also expressed concern about climate change in his Independence Day address on August 15, 2025. Yet, in practice, the government appears far from serious. The biggest driver of climate change is large-scale destruction of forests and land in the name of development. Forests in India are being wiped out at an alarming pace, causing rapid year-on-year growth in carbon emissions.
Before liberalization in 1990, India’s carbon emissions stood at 600.68 million metric tonnes. By 2024, they had risen to 3,962 million metric tonnes, and are expected to reach 4,000 million tonnes in 2025. The devastating floods and landslides in Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttarakhand during this year’s monsoon are stark warnings. Agriculture contributes just 1% to emissions, while the power sector contributes 47%, industries 22%, transport 11% and construction 8%.
While promoting domestic and foreign corporate interests, the government has accelerated deforestation—but conceals the reality by counting artificial plantations as forest cover. On July 24, 2025, the government informed Parliament that between 2019 and 2023, forest cover in Madhya Pradesh fell by 408.56 sq km and in Arunachal Pradesh by 806.43 sq km. According to the India State of Forest Report (ISFR), Arunachal’s forest cover fell from 66,688 sq km in 2019 to 65,881.57 sq km in 2023; Madhya Pradesh from 77,483 to 77,073.44 sq km; Nagaland from 17,119 to 12,227.47 sq km; Manipur from 16,487 to 12,222.47 sq km; and Meghalaya from 17,119 to 16,966.46 sq km.
In Maharashtra’s Gadchiroli, Lloyd Metals & Energy Ltd has been permitted to cut 123,000 trees across 937 hectares for an iron ore project. In Nashik, 1,700 trees may be felled for Kumbh preparations. Andhra Pradesh lost 42,400 hectares of forest between 2001 and 2024; in 2024 alone, 468 hectares were cleared. Uttarakhand has lost 50,000 hectares over two decades. In Chhattisgarh’s Hasdeo forest—often called the lungs of India—1,742.60 hectares containing 448,874 trees were transferred for coal mining on June 26, 2025. In Kanker district, over 5,000 trees were cut before a public hearing could be held. In Ladakh, 20,000 acres have been allotted to Adani Group for a large solar project.
Meanwhile, the government claims that India’s forest area has increased—from 712,249 sq km in 2019 to 715,342.61 sq km in 2023. This increase, however, represents monoculture plantations rather than dense, biodiverse forests. Old forests host complex ecosystems, wildlife, tribal culture, food and medicinal traditions, and absorb massive carbon. Artificial plantations do not.
Air Pollution: A Public Health Emergency
Climate change is deeply linked to air pollution—each worsening the other. Deforestation, mining, industries, transportation, diesel-petrol fuel, and waste burning are the major causes. Every winter, India’s plains endure severe toxic smog, and Delhi’s air has remained “hazardous” for months.
Half of Delhi’s office workers have been told to work from home. The government orders costly air purifiers, yet most residents cannot afford such devices or remote work options. Construction bans leave thousands of labourers jobless, street vendors lose customers, small traders are crippled, and daily-wage workers must travel for hours breathing toxic air.
Schools run in hybrid mode, leaving poor children behind. Children—whose future depends on clean air—are suffering asthma, lung inflammation, and eye irritation. In 2021, pollution killed an estimated 169,000 children under the age of five. Nearly 2 million people died due to air-pollution-related diseases in India that year. Pregnant women and infants face the gravest danger.
Pollution has led to a sharp rise in heart disease, stroke, diabetes, lung cancer and tuberculosis. Yet governments blame each other and farmers instead of tackling the root causes.
Protest, Suppression, and Distraction
When student and environmental groups peacefully demanded clean air and protection of forests, police detained them. Protests on November 5 and 9 at India Gate were stopped and participants abandoned in remote areas at night. On November 23, 23 protesters were arrested and beaten; one image showed a policeman kneeling on a student’s chest and covering his mouth.
Some protesters raising slogans such as “Save Jal-Jungle-Zameen” and “Hidma Amar Rahe” argued that Hidma’s struggle in central India was linked to protecting forest land and therefore connected to climate justice. However, instead of addressing pollution, government agencies and media amplified these slogans to divert attention away from environmental demands.
The Real Question
The government tells the world that developed nations must take responsibility for historic emissions. That argument is valid. But the same government cannot evade its responsibility to protect Indian citizens. Clean air is not a luxury; it is a fundamental right.
If forests disappear, if toxic air kills children, if labourers starve without work, if police brutalize peaceful protesters—what remains of democracy or governance?
By turning pollution into a market for masks, purifiers and profit, have we turned disaster into an “opportunity” for corporations?
Time to Act
The government must:
- Develop a long-term plan to reduce emissions at their source, not through temporary bans.
- Protect natural forests rather than replacing them with plantations.
- Hold industries and transport polluters accountable.
- Stop suppressing climate activism and environmental defenders.
- Order legal action against police involved in brutality at India Gate.
- Implement in India the same commitment demanded at COP-30.
Every breath we take reminds us that the path of “development” has been built at the cost of our lungs—our lives.
The people of India deserve clean air. The government must act now.
---
*Social worker and independent journalist 

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan   The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution. 

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.