Skip to main content

A landmark verdict: The Supreme Court puts conservation over commerce in Saranda forest

By Raj Kumar Sinha* 
In a powerful demonstration of judicial environmentalism, the Supreme Court has issued a landmark order protecting the Saranda forest area in Jharkhand, a region rightly described as one of the country's most beautiful and dense Sal (Shorea robusta) forests. This ruling, delivered by a bench of Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, is not just a victory for a specific forest; it is a critical step in affirming the legal and moral duty of the State to safeguard our ecological treasures.
The apex court has directed the Jharkhand government to officially notify the Saranda area as a Wildlife Sanctuary within three months, upholding the spirit of a 1968 notification that had already declared 31,468.25 hectares (approximately 314 sq. km) a "Saranda Game Sanctuary."
The Ban on Mining: A Conservation Imperative
Crucially, the Court has reinforced the nationwide ban on all mining activities within national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, and within a one-kilometre radius of their boundaries. This absolute prohibition is vital, as mining is unequivocally one of the most destructive human activities in a protected zone.
The Saranda case highlights the devastating conflict between resource extraction and ecology. For years, the region, which is a biodiversity "hotspot" and a critical wildlife corridor connecting the forests of Odisha and Chhattisgarh, has suffered immense environmental and wildlife loss due to rampant mining. It is home to endangered species like the Asian Elephant, Four-horned Antelope, Sloth Bear, Leopard, and Gaur.
The State's shifting stance—initially proposing a larger sanctuary, then retreating to a smaller area citing concerns over livelihoods and Naxal activities—drew sharp disapproval from the Court, leading to a direct order for the Chief Secretary's personal appearance. This judicial firmness was necessary to counter the delay and dithering that often plague conservation efforts. The Court rightly pointed out that since the State's own affidavits admitted to no active mining in the originally notified 31,468.25 hectares, there was no valid reason to withhold its declaration as a Wildlife Sanctuary.
Protecting People and the Planet
One of the most significant aspects of the judgment is the Court's explicit direction to the State government to widely publicise that this decision will not adversely affect the individual and community rights of the tribals and forest dwellers under Sections 3 and 4(1) of the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006.
This is a crucial balance. Conservation efforts must not come at the cost of dispossessing the communities who have been the traditional guardians of the forest. By securing their rights under the FRA, the Court has paved the way for a holistic, community-based conservation model.
The necessity of the ban is underscored by the tragic impact of mining on the region's flagship species: the Asian Elephant. These magnificent animals require vast traditional corridors, which mining leases have repeatedly intersected. The result is increasing human-elephant conflict, crop destruction, and loss of life—a crisis particularly acute in Saranda. Furthermore, mining has severely impacted water quality in rivers like the Koina, jeopardising the entire ecosystem.
The Court's decision rests on strong constitutional and legal foundations, referencing Articles 48A and 51A(g) which mandate the protection of forests and wildlife, alongside the clear directives of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, the National Forest Policy (1988), and the National Wildlife Action Plan (2017–31). The judgment echoes the concerns of the Justice M.B. Shah Commission (2013), which had warned against illegal mining and its destruction of elephant habitats in Saranda.
This verdict is a historic milestone in India's environmental jurisprudence. It emphatically clarifies that State governments bear a legal and moral responsibility to formally notify and protect their environmentally sensitive areas. The Saranda decision is a momentous step not only for Jharkhand but for the entire nation, offering a beacon of hope for balancing crucial wildlife conservation with the constitutional rights of our tribal populations.
---
*Bargi Dam Displaced and Affected Association

Comments

TRENDING

US-China truce temporary, larger trade war between two economies to continue

By Prabir Purkayastha   The Trump-Xi meeting in Busan, South Korea on 30 October 2025 may have brought about a temporary relief in the US-China trade war. But unless we see the fine print of the agreement, it is difficult to assess whether this is a temporary truce or the beginning of a real rapprochement between the two nations. The jury is still out on that one and we will wait for a better understanding of what has really been achieved in Busan.

When growth shrinks people: Capitalism and the biological decline of the U.S. population

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Critically acclaimed Hungarian-American economic historian and distinguished scholar of economic anthropometric history, Prof. John Komlos (Professor Emeritus, University of Munich), who pioneered the study of the history of human height and weight, has published an article titled “The Decline in the Physical Stature of the U.S. Population Parallels the Diminution in the Rate of Increase in Life Expectancy” on October 31, 2025, in the forthcoming issue of Social Science & Medicine (SSM) – Population Health, Volume 32, December 2025. The findings of the article present a damning critique of the barbaric nature of capitalism and its detrimental impact on human health, highlighting that the average height of Americans began to decline during the era of free-market capitalism. The study draws on an analysis of 17 surveys from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (...

Mergers and privatisation: The Finance Minister’s misguided banking agenda

By Thomas Franco   The Finance Minister has once again revived talk of merging two or three large public sector banks to make them globally competitive. Reports also suggest that the government is considering appointing Managing Directors in public sector banks from the private sector. Both moves would strike at the heart of India’s public banking system . Privatisation undermines the constitutional vision of social and economic justice, and such steps could lead to irreversible damage.

Shrinking settlements, fading schools: The Tibetan exile crisis in India

By Tseten Lhundup*  Since the 14th Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, the Tibetan exile community in Dharamsala has established the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as the guardian of Tibetan culture and identity. Once admired for its democratic governance , educational system , and religious vitality , the exile community now faces an alarming demographic and institutional decline. 

Sardar Patel was on Nathuram Godse's hit list: Noted Marathi writer Sadanand More

Sadanand More (right) By  A  Representative In a surprise revelation, well-known Gujarati journalist Hari Desai has claimed that Nathuram Godse did not just kill Mahatma Gandhi, but also intended to kill Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. Citing a voluminous book authored by Sadanand More, “Lokmanya to Mahatma”, Volume II, translated from Marathi into English last year, Desai says, nowadays, there is a lot of talk about conspiracy to kill Gandhi, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, and Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, but little is known about how the Sardar was also targeted.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Political misfires in Bihar: Reasons behind the Opposition's self-inflicted defeat

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The Bihar Vidhansabha Election 2025 verdict is out. I maintained deliberate silence about the growing tribe of “social media” experts and their opinions. Lately, these do not fascinate me. Anyone forming an opinion solely on the basis of these “experts” lives in a fool’s paradise. I do not watch them, nor do I follow them on Twitter. I stayed away partly because I was not certain of a MahaGathbandhan victory, even though I wanted it. But my personal preference is not the issue here. The parties disappointed.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...