Skip to main content

Environmental concern? Global NGO leads campaign urging banks to cut ties with Odisha steel project

By Rajiv Shah 
A decade after the withdrawal of the South Korean multinational POSCO from Odisha following large-scale protests, questions remain about whether India-based JSW Steel, which took over the project, can successfully revive the 13.2 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) steel plant and coal-fired power plant. POSCO initiated the project in 2005 but exited in 2017 due to sustained local opposition.
The issue has resurfaced amid a renewed grassroots campaign, supported by the global NGO BankTrack, which argues that the 2,677.80 acres of forest land acquired for the project should be returned to local communities rather than retained by the state government. The Anti-Jindal & Anti-POSCO Movement (JPPSS) has filed a complaint with Australian bank ANZ and Japanese banks Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC), Mizuho, and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), urging them to withdraw financing from the Rs 65,000 crore (USD 7.8 billion) JSW Utkal Steel project, which includes a 900 MW captive coal power plant.
The complaint, filed with BankTrack’s support, alleges human rights violations linked to JSW Steel and calls on the banks to cease further financial involvement until an independent investigation and remedial process is completed. It highlights that between 2019 and 2024, these banks issued multiple loans to JSW Steel, during which time the company allegedly acquired land without the consent of indigenous residents, undermined livelihoods, and collaborated with the state to suppress opposition.
According to the complaint, peaceful protestors faced excessive police force, arbitrary arrests, ill-treatment in custody, and restricted movement. The project site, located in a region already classified as severely polluted with a Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index (CEPI) score of 69.26, risks exacerbating environmental degradation and public health concerns if developed. A 2022 briefing by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air warns that the proposed steel plant would significantly exceed WHO air pollution limits, impacting local health.
JSW Steel, headquartered in Mumbai, is India’s second-largest steel producer and the twelfth-largest globally. A subsidiary of the USD 24 billion JSW Group, it operates 13 steel plants—11 in India, one in the U.S., and one in Italy—along with 12 iron ore and three metallurgical coal mines. JSW Steel supplies major automotive firms including Fiat, Piaggio, and Ford. According to Global Energy Monitor, 66% of its crude steelmaking capacity is coal-based.
The NGO claims JSW Steel emits 2.36 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of steel—higher than the global average of 1.95 and India’s average of 2.0. Although JSW has a Climate Action Plan, it only targets emission intensity for 2030 and 2050, not absolute emissions. 
The plan also overlooks coal mine methane, which could increase the company’s climate impact by 27%. BankTrack argues that for the steel industry to meet the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C target, no new blast furnaces lacking 90% effective carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) should be commissioned after 2025. Despite this, JSW Steel plans to commission seven new coal-fired blast furnaces by 2036. With a 20-year operational life, these furnaces would likely operate into the 2050s. The company also plans to build a captive coal-fired power plant for the Utkal project.
In securing coal supplies, JSW Steel is actively acquiring or developing metallurgical coal mines in India, Mozambique, and Australia. It appears on Urgewald’s metallurgical coal exit list for its plans to develop two coal mines in India: Sitanala and Parbatpur Central.
BankTrack reports that constructing the Utkal project involves clear-cutting hundreds of acres of forest, with photographic evidence suggesting this has already begun without environmental clearance. The project also includes a port requiring the destruction of mangrove forests and sand dunes—critical ecosystems for local biodiversity and livelihoods.
The NGO further warns that the plant would extract large volumes of water from the Mahanadi river for industrial cooling, while discharging pollutants that threaten the river’s quality. As the Mahanadi is a key drinking water source, this poses a direct risk to water security for nearby villages.
Since 2022, several human rights defenders—including Narendra Mohanty, Debendra Swain, Muralidhar Sahoo, and others—have been arrested in connection with peaceful opposition to the project, which BankTrack describes as a criminalisation of dissent. Protests continue, with residents of Dhinkia village marking the third anniversary of a police crackdown by observing a Black Day earlier this year.
Earlier, on February 20 also, BankTrack sent letters to 22 banks that had recently financed JSW Steel—including BNP Paribas, Mashreq Bank, and Standard Chartered—urging them to publicly rule out support for the Odisha project. While 12 banks responded, none committed to withdrawing support.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.