Skip to main content

AISEC calls for rollback of privatization, communalization in Indian education system

By A Representative 
On the birth anniversary of social reformer Raja Rammohan Roy, the All India Save Education Committee (AISEC) unveiled the Draft People’s Education Policy 2025 (PEP 2025), presenting it as a comprehensive and democratic alternative to the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Framed after extensive consultations with educators, students, parents, and civil society groups, the draft aims to revive the vision of India’s freedom fighters for an education system that is truly universal, secular, scientific, democratic, and inclusive.
The release of the draft policy comes after years of nationwide opposition to NEP 2020, which AISEC criticizes as a centralized and top-down imposition that bypassed parliamentary debate and ignored the voices of key stakeholders. AISEC points out that the NEP was finalized during the COVID-19 lockdown and was never placed before Parliament, despite education being a subject on the Concurrent List requiring both central and state collaboration.
According to AISEC, NEP 2020 undermines the constitutional promise of equality in education by promoting privatization, commercialization, and online models of learning that exclude large sections of the population. It notes that the NEP's vision is heavily skewed toward central control and market-oriented goals, and it dangerously opens the door to religious and ideological indoctrination under the guise of “decolonizing” Indian education.
In contrast, the People’s Education Policy 2025 is rooted in the values of social justice, pluralism, and federalism. The document traces the historical evolution of education in India—from its exclusionary nature in ancient and medieval times to the role played by modern social reformers and freedom fighters in advocating for mass education. The policy acknowledges past efforts post-independence to universalize education but highlights persistent disparities in access, quality, and infrastructure, especially for rural, marginalized, and economically disadvantaged communities.
PEP 2025 outlines a vision for a robust public education system that is fully state-funded and democratically governed. It opposes the NEP’s 5+3+3+4 structural shift and instead reaffirms the 10+2 framework, integrating pre-primary, primary, and middle schooling into a cohesive system. The draft calls for free and compulsory education up to Class 12, with state responsibility for funding infrastructure, hiring qualified teachers, and ensuring uniform standards across rural and urban areas.
The draft policy pays detailed attention to addressing educational disparities. It proposes specific strategies for improving access and quality in rural schools, increasing girls’ enrollment through gender-sensitive curriculum reforms, ensuring educational support for socially disadvantaged groups like Scheduled Castes and Tribes, and expanding facilities for children with physical and mental disabilities. It also recognizes the challenges faced by children of migrant workers, street children, and others on the social margins, demanding inclusive measures to integrate them into mainstream education.
The People’s Education Policy places strong emphasis on keeping school curricula secular, scientific, and rational. It argues for eliminating content that reinforces caste, gender, and religious stereotypes and calls for a curriculum that fosters critical thinking, mutual respect, and constitutional values. It opposes any interference by political authorities in syllabus-making and urges that curriculum decisions be left to independent academic bodies composed of educators and experts.
At the higher education level, PEP 2025 strongly opposes centralized entrance tests like CUET and NEET, advocating instead for admissions based on local and institutional processes. It criticizes the NEP's “entry and exit” system for degrees as disruptive and misleading, and calls for stable three-year and four-year structures based on disciplinary requirements. The policy also raises concerns over the unchecked growth of private universities and insists that the government must not allow self-financing models in public institutions.
In the domain of research, the draft insists on academic freedom, ethical standards, and adequate public funding. It supports the reinstatement of M.Phil programmes and demands stipends and fellowships for all research scholars, while rejecting government interference in topic selection or research direction.
On professional education, including engineering, medicine, law, and agriculture, the draft policy calls for periodic curriculum updates, government funding, and a scientific approach. It rejects practices such as capitation fees and management/NRI quotas in professional institutions and emphasizes that all professional courses must also include humanities subjects to nurture socially conscious graduates.
AISEC has called for wide-ranging discussions on the draft across the country. “This is only a draft,” said a representative of the Committee, “and we will continue to hold consultations with all stakeholders before finalizing the policy. Our aim is to present a truly people-centric education framework, one that fulfills the constitutional promise and the dreams of India’s freedom fighters.”
The final version of the People’s Education Policy 2025, once revised based on public feedback, will be placed before a National People’s Parliament and then submitted to the central and state governments with a demand for its implementation.
In a climate of growing concern over the direction of India's education system, the release of this draft signals a determined pushback from civil society. It seeks to reclaim education as a public good, a tool of empowerment, and a cornerstone of a democratic and egalitarian society.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Happy to know about the release of People’s Education Policy. It seems to reflect the views of common man.

TRENDING

Can free‑living Indian street dogs teach us about how to care for pet dogs?

By Daniel Ramp, Kapil Vishwas Patwardhan, Rosalie Chapple  We give our pet dogs shelter, veterinary care, affection, training and play. We decide when they eat, where they sleep, when they go outside, who they meet, and how they move through the world.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”