Skip to main content

Receiving fulsome praise from RSS-BJP, will Dr. Ambedkar survive if he appears now in India?

By Shamsul Islam 
If we trust the glorification of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar by the RSS-BJP rulers on his birth anniversary, it would seem as if there have never been more loyal followers of him than them. According to PM Modi, he was the “architect of the Constitution of India” and “Messiah of Scheduled Castes.” The UP government has announced a grand celebration of ‘Ambedkar Jayanti,’ beginning with a series of programmes from the morning of April 13 (2025), leading up to the main celebrations on April 14 in Lucknow, which will be attended by Hindutva icon CM Adityanath. These programmes “aim to acquaint the younger generation with Dr Ambedkar’s remarkable life, visionary leadership, and his unwavering commitment to justice, equality, and social reform.”
Dr. Ambedkar is receiving fulsome praise now that he is no longer alive. When he was alive, the RSS and its allies, including VD Savarkar-led Hindu Mahasabha, never missed an opportunity to denigrate him—often going so far as to burn his effigy. If Dr. Ambedkar were to reappear today in a BJP-RSS ruled India, it's certain he would either be lynched or jailed under terror laws for opposing casteism, the denigration of Shudras and women, upper-caste hegemony, and Hindutva.
1. Dr. Ambedkar Supported the Burning of Manusmriti
The RSS has long advocated replacing the Indian Constitution with the Manusmriti or Manu Code, which is infamous for its derogatory and inhumane references to Shudras, Untouchables, and women. When the Constitution was finalized on November 26, 1949, the RSS was discontent. Its mouthpiece, Organiser, in a November 30, 1949 editorial, lamented:
“But in our Constitution, there is no mention of the unique constitutional development in ancient Bharat. Manu’s Laws were written long before Lycurgus of Sparta or Solon of Persia… But to our constitutional pundits that means nothing.”
By demanding the promulgation of the Manu Code in independent India, the RSS was echoing its ideological guru VD Savarkar, who stated:
“Manusmriti is that scripture which is most worship-able after the Vedas for our Hindu Nation… Today Manusmriti is Hindu Law.”
It is notable that Dr. Ambedkar publicly burned a copy of Manusmriti at the historic Mahad Satyagraha on December 25, 1927, and called for it to be burned annually on that date.
2. Dr. Ambedkar Held High-Caste Hindus Responsible for the Miserable Condition of the Masses and Hatred for Muslims
He made it clear:
“[The] high caste Hindus are bad as leaders… They have a monopoly of education and wealth, and with wealth and education they have captured the State… They take every move to exclude the lower classes of Hindus from wealth, education and power…”
“This attitude… is sought to be extended by them to the Muslims. They want to exclude the Muslims from place and power, as they have done to the lower-class Hindus. This trait… is the key to the understanding of their politics.”
[B.R. Ambedkar, Pakistan or the Partition of India, Bombay: Government of Maharashtra, 1990, p. 123]
3. Dr. Ambedkar Renounced Hinduism
In his historic speech in Nagpur on October 15, 1956, the day after converting to Buddhism, Ambedkar declared:
“The movement to leave the Hindu religion was taken in hand by us in 1935… I am happy; I am ecstatic! I have left hell — this is how I feel…”
If he were to try converting today, we can only imagine the terrible fate he would meet.
4. Dr. Ambedkar Fought for Equal Rights for Women
For the RSS, Hindu women are considered inferior. It upholds Manusmriti, which denigrates women in statements like:
a. "Day and night woman must be kept in dependence…"
b. "A woman is never fit for independence."
c. "They give themselves to the handsome and to the ugly…"
d. "They become disloyal to their husbands…"
e. "Impure desires, wrath, dishonesty… bad conduct."
f. "Women are as impure as falsehood itself…"
In contrast, Ambedkar believed:
“We shall see better days… if male education is pursued side by side with female education.”
“I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress women have achieved.”
He advised Dalit women:
“Never regard yourself as Untouchables… Attend more to the cultivation of the mind… Education is as necessary for females as it is for males…”
5. Dr. Ambedkar Opposed the Hindu Nation and Hindutva
A sharp analyst of communal politics, Ambedkar highlighted the eerie agreement between Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League on the Two-Nation Theory:
“Strange it may appear, Mr. Savarkar and Mr. Jinnah… are in complete agreement… there are two nations in India.”
He denounced the idea of Hindu Rashtra:
“If Hindu Raj becomes a fact, it will be the greatest calamity… It is a menace to liberty, equality and fraternity… Hindu Raj must be prevented at any cost.”
6. Dr. Ambedkar Advocated Socialism
Responding to Nehru’s Objective Resolution in the Constituent Assembly (December 17, 1946), Ambedkar stated:
“… I should have expected some provision… for social and economic justice… I expected the resolution to state… there would be nationalisation of industry and land…”
7. Dr. Ambedkar Rejected Bigoted 'Patriots' and 'Nationalists'
In 1931, he said that when he demanded equality for the oppressed, he was branded anti-national. He declared:
“India is a peculiar country, and her nationalists and patriots are a peculiar people… The patriot's one cry is power… I belong to that class which takes its stand on democracy… Our aim is to realise… one man, one value in all walks of life.”
[Plenary Session, Round Table Conference, London, 8th Sitting, January 19, 1931]
---
Links to S. Islam's writings (English, Hindi, Urdu + translations): http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam. Facebook: https://facebook.com/shamsul.islam.332. Twitter: @shamsforjustice. http://shamsforpeace.blogspot.com/. Books in English, Hindi & Urdu: https://tinyurl.com/shams-books

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...