Skip to main content

Overflowing Jhelum panics PoK residents, seen as Pahalgam aftereffect

By Nava Thakuria*  
Amid India’s mounting pressure on Pakistan for its patronage of terrorism in Kashmir over decades, several Pakistani media outlets have attributed the upsurge in the Jhelum River—flowing from Jammu & Kashmir into Pakistan—as by New Delhi. Mainstream newspapers and news channels in Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi reported the overflow of Jhelum as a probable consequence of India's suspension of a 65-year-old bilateral river treaty following the Pahalgam terrorist attack on 22 April 2025, in which 26 innocent Indian tourists were killed by Islamist terrorists.
India responded strongly with a diplomatic offensive, including closing the integrated Attari-Wagah border crossing, suspending visa services for Pakistani nationals, and abrogating the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), signed in 1960 by then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Pakistan President Mohammed Ayub Khan. India’s Foreign Ministry announced the treaty’s suspension would remain until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably renounced its support for cross-border terrorism. Islamabad, in turn, vowed retaliatory measures. The National Investigation Agency has since taken charge of probing the Pahalgam attack.
On 27 April, The Express Tribune, a popular Pakistani newspaper, reported unexpected flooding in the Jhelum River in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). “The sudden release of water triggered a high-level flood, causing widespread panic among local communities overnight,” the report claimed, adding that the Muzaffarabad administration declared a water emergency. Announcements from mosques warned riverside residents to adopt immediate precautions, while emergency protocols were initiated. 
The News International echoed similar concerns, alleging the flood violated international laws and river agreements. Daily Times suggested that India had released water into the Jhelum without prior notification, causing a sharp rise in levels. The local administration advised residents near the riverbanks to stay away. Dunya News reported an 8-foot rise in water levels in Muzaffarabad, while Pakistan Today noted similar surges in Chakothi. Ary News claimed the water release, allegedly from the Uri hydroelectric dam, aimed to create a flood-like scenario in Pakistan.
Indian authorities remained silent on speculations regarding the flood. The water level, however, subsided the following day. Experts attributed the overflow to melting snow and heavy rain in Kashmir’s catchment areas. Some raised concerns that reservoir flushing operations at Indian hydroelectric projects might have exacerbated the flooding. They cautioned that repeating such releases during the sowing season could impact irrigation and agriculture in Pakistan’s Punjab province.
Meanwhile, following the Pahalgam attack, India’s Information & Broadcasting Ministry issued an advisory urging all media outlets, especially news channels, to refrain from live coverage of defense operations or troop movements. “No real-time coverage, dissemination of visuals, or reporting based on ‘sources-based’ information concerning defense activities should be undertaken. Premature disclosure of sensitive details could inadvertently aid hostile elements,” the advisory stated, citing examples like the Kargil War and the Mumbai attacks, where unrestricted media coverage had unintended consequences.
The advisory emphasized the media's legal and moral responsibilities, urging stakeholders to exercise vigilance and uphold national security. It warned that violation of Cable Television Network Rules, specifically Rule 6(1)(p), would result in legal action. Media coverage should be restricted to official briefings by designated government representatives until the conclusion of operations. 
The ministry concluded, “Media and digital platforms play a vital role in safeguarding national security. Let us ensure that collective actions do not compromise the safety and effectiveness of our forces.”
---
*Senior journalist based in Guwahati 

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam. -- Editor

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.
Post a Comment
»

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”
Post a Comment
»

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.
Post a Comment
»