Skip to main content

Why Bangladesh must align wages, working conditions, trade union rights with international standards

By Abu Sufian* 
Bangladesh stands at a critical juncture in its quest to revive Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) benefits, which offer duty-free access to key markets like the United States and the European Union. Recent statements from Finance Adviser Dr. Salehuddin Ahmed and Commerce Adviser Sheikh Bashir Uddin underscore the interim government’s diplomatic push to restore these trade privileges, with a clear focus on addressing labour rights deficiencies. This initiative is not just about ticking boxes for GSP compliance—it’s about fostering fair, sustainable economic growth that aligns with global standards. For Bangladesh, a nation heavily reliant on its garment industry, prioritizing robust labour law implementation is non-negotiable.
The garment sector, which accounts for 85% of Bangladesh’s export earnings and ranks second globally, faces mounting challenges. Competitors like Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos are gaining ground, and Bangladesh risks losing its edge if it fails to address persistent labour rights issues. The country has faced international criticism for substandard working conditions, inadequate wages, child labour, and restrictions on trade unions. These are not mere reputational blemishes—they threaten Bangladesh’s economic lifeline.
Take the recent 9% wage hike for garment workers, effective December 1, 2024. While a step forward, it falls short of the 15% increase workers demanded, especially against a backdrop of 14.1% food inflation (per BBS data from July 2024). With wage growth lagging behind inflation—6.17% in July and 8.1% in November 2024 against 13.8% inflation—workers’ real income and purchasing power are eroding. The minimum wage of $105 (recently increased) pales in comparison to Vietnam ($132–192), Jordan ($366), or even Cambodia. This reliance on cheap labour, a hallmark of Bangladesh’s garment industry for 45 years, is no longer viable in a competitive global market that increasingly values ethical production.
The consequences of low wages extend beyond worker dissatisfaction. Malnutrition and declining health are reducing productivity, trapping Bangladesh in a middle-income quagmire, as noted by economist Dr. Debapriya Bhattacharya. The International Labour Organization’s 2024–25 report ranks Bangladesh third in South Asia for low-wage workers, a statistic that should sound alarms. Meanwhile, the EU and U.S. have repeatedly flagged concerns about cheap labour, with the latter tying long-term purchase orders to meaningful wage increases, as seen in Cambodia’s successful model.
The U.S. has outlined 11 labour rights priorities for Bangladesh, including simplifying trade union registration (reducing the required worker consent from 20% to 10%) and raising minimum wages to global standards. A U.S. labour delegation’s visit to Dhaka in November 2024 reinforced this message: addressing labour rights is critical not only for GSP reinstatement but also for democratic stability and inclusive growth. The EU, which absorbs 58% of Bangladesh’s exports, offers GSP+ benefits contingent on compliance with 32 international conventions and the government’s National Action Plan (NAP). Failure to meet these standards risks a 8.7% duty on EU exports and a 16% duty on U.S. exports, which would cripple the garment sector.
The stakes are higher as Bangladesh nears graduation from least developed country (LDC) status, after which GSP benefits will vanish without robust labour reforms. The Rana Plaza collapse and Tazreen Fashions fire led to the U.S. suspending GSP benefits, a reminder of the cost of inaction. Yet, there is hope. The interim government’s formation of a Labour Reform Commission, welcomed by the U.S., and its acceptance of the EU’s 2023 Universal Periodic Review signal progress. But intent must translate into action.
Bangladesh’s economy, propped up by garment exports and remittances, cannot afford complacency. Labour law reform is not just a prerequisite for GSP benefits—it’s a moral and economic imperative. By aligning wages, working conditions, and trade union rights with international standards, Bangladesh can secure its place in global markets, improve worker livelihoods, and build a resilient economy. The time to act is now.
---
*Independent researcher and freelance columnist

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights.