Union govt called out over selective forest protection amidst alarming deforestation trends

By A Representative

In a strongly worded letter addressed to Union Minister for Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Sri Bhupender Yadav, climate and energy policy analyst Shankar Sharma has raised serious concerns over the Union government’s selective response to deforestation and continued approval of ecologically destructive projects across India.

The letter references a statement made by the Minister in Rajya Sabha on April 3, where he assured action on the deforestation incident in Kancha Gachibowli, Hyderabad. While welcoming the minister’s prompt response, Sharma draws attention to a deeper, systemic issue—what he describes as a consistent pattern of forest diversion approvals across BJP-ruled states and Union territories, including inside legally Protected Areas (PAs), with minimal public scrutiny or legal accountability.

Citing a recent investigative report by The Wire, titled "Union Govt was Quick to Note Deforestation in Hyderabad. Here are Similar Projects It Is Ignoring", Sharma urges the ministry to address similar alarming cases of deforestation occurring across the country. The report points to seven such major projects where large-scale forest clearance has been greenlit without adequate environmental justification.

He further highlights Parliamentary data and government reports revealing the approval of 173,000 hectares of forest land for non-forestry purposes and the diversion of nearly 60,000 hectares over just three years. Despite India’s National Forest Policy targeting 33% forest and tree cover, official estimates indicate that the figure remains at a meagre 24% and is declining in several ecologically sensitive states.

The letter strongly criticizes the MoEF&CC, the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL), and the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for routinely granting clearances, even for projects located within wildlife sanctuaries and eco-sensitive zones. Sharma underscores this as contradictory to the Supreme Court’s own observations that cutting a large number of trees is worse than killing a human being, and that deforestation is a key driver of extreme weather events and biodiversity loss.

Drawing attention to the Supreme Court’s recent judgments linking heat waves to loss of green cover and recognizing climate change as a direct threat to the citizens’ right to life, Sharma challenges the government to uphold these principles in practice. He asks: “Who should be held accountable for routine approvals of forest diversion within ecologically critical zones, especially when civil society provides credible, less-destructive alternatives?”

One case in point is a proposed 2,000 MW pumped storage hydropower plant (PSP) in the Sharavathi river valley in Karnataka’s Western Ghats, which threatens to destroy 350 acres of pristine rainforest. Sharma argues that alternative technologies such as Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) offer a less harmful solution for integrating renewable energy, yet authorities are pressing ahead with multiple PSPs in biodiversity hotspots.

He warns that the cumulative impact of such projects—over 500 of which were cleared within PAs between 2014 and 2018 alone—poses a grave threat to India’s ecological security, wildlife habitats, and climate commitments.

The letter ends with an urgent appeal to policymakers to transparently define how much forest loss is “acceptable,” and to publicly disclose forest diversion policies, enabling informed participation from civil society and reducing conflict between governance and grassroots conservation efforts.

Copy of the letter has also been marked to Prime Minister Narendra Modi for urgent attention.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog