Revisiting the Supreme Court verdict on Tamil Nadu bills: A constitutional perspective

By N.S. Venkataraman*

On April 8, 2025, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India criticized the Tamil Nadu Governor for not providing assent to ten bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, keeping them pending for several months. The Court went so far as to approve the bills themselves, despite the fact that the Governor had forwarded them to the President of India, who subsequently rejected some of them.

This decision by the Court has brought to the forefront questions regarding the balance of power between the judiciary and the office of the President of India. By effectively approving the bills that the President had already rejected, the judgment raises constitutional concerns and may risk creating a constitutional imbalance. It has also prompted discussions about whether the judiciary exceeded its authority by acting in a space traditionally occupied by the legislature, the executive, and ultimately the President.

Reactions to the verdict have been mixed. While some politicians have welcomed the judgment, several legal experts have expressed reservations. The broader principle often cited in the justice system is that judgments must be both legally sound and appear to be fair and comprehensive in spirit. In this context, questions are being raised about whether the Supreme Court took a sufficiently holistic view of the issue.

The bills in question pertain to the governance of state universities in Tamil Nadu, where the Governor traditionally holds the position of Chancellor. These legislative proposals aim to transfer the power to appoint Vice-Chancellors from the Governor to the state government. This effectively places the responsibility with the Chief Minister and other political appointees, removing an important buffer of independent oversight.

The role of the Governor, a nominee of the President of India, includes ensuring that universities are managed in accordance with constitutional principles and educational standards, rather than being influenced by political considerations. Universities are not administrative departments or state-run enterprises, and thus require a level of autonomy and non-partisan oversight.

There are broader concerns related to governance in India, including accusations of nepotism and corruption in states governed by political parties. In such a context, placing the control of Vice-Chancellor appointments entirely in the hands of the ruling party could lead to appointments based on political considerations rather than merit. In the past, there have been allegations of political interference in such appointments in Tamil Nadu.

Another contentious aspect is the Tamil Nadu government's opposition to including a University Grants Commission (UGC) nominee on the selection committee for Vice-Chancellors. This contradicts established procedures that include UGC representation, given that the UGC, as a central agency, provides significant funding and oversight. The inclusion of a UGC nominee ensures that appointees meet national standards and that public funds are managed responsibly.

The judiciary appears to have interpreted the Governor’s delay as obstructionism, without adequately examining the broader implications of the proposed legislative changes. The impact of approving all bills passed by a state assembly without scrutiny, particularly in areas affecting national interest and constitutional balance, has not been sufficiently addressed in the verdict.

Given the complex nature of Indian federalism, where state leaders sometimes express unwillingness to implement central laws, there is a need for checks and balances. In this instance, the President of India exercised her constitutional authority by rejecting certain bills, believing them to be against the national interest. Questioning this decision by the Supreme Court introduces further tension between constitutional institutions.

---

*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

Gujarat minority rights group seeks suspension of Botad police officials for brutal assault on minor

By A Representative A human rights group, the Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat, has written to the Director General of Police (DGP), Gandhinagar, demanding the immediate suspension and criminal action against police personnel of Botad police station for allegedly brutally assaulting a minor boy from the Muslim community.

On Teachers’ Day, remembering Mother Teresa as the teacher of compassion

By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ It is Teachers’ Day once again! Significantly, the day also marks the Feast of St. Teresa of Calcutta (still lovingly called Mother Teresa). In 2012, the United Nations, as a fitting tribute to her, declared this day the International Day of Charity. A day pregnant with meaning—one that we must celebrate as meaningfully as possible.

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

Is U.S. fast losing its financial and technological edge under Trump’s second tenure?

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra* The United States, along with its Western European allies, once promoted globalization as a democratic force that would deliver shared prosperity and balanced growth. That promise has unraveled. Globalization, instead of building an even world, has produced one defined by inequality, asymmetry of power, and new vulnerabilities. For decades, Washington successfully turned this system to its advantage. Today, however, under Trump’s second administration, America is attempting to exploit the weaknesses of others without acknowledging how exposed it has become itself.

Bhojpuri cinema’s crisis: When popularity becomes an excuse for vulgarity

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Bhojpuri cinema is expanding rapidly. Songs from new films are eagerly awaited, and the industry is hailed for its booming business. Yet, big money and mass popularity do not automatically translate into quality cinema or meaningful content. The market has compelled us to celebrate numbers, even when what is being produced is deeply troubling.

What mainstream economists won’t tell you about Chinese modernisation

By Shiran Illanperuma China’s modernisation has been one of the most remarkable processes of the 21st century and one that has sparked endless academic debate. Meng Jie (孟捷), a distinguished professor from the School of Marxism at Fudan University in Shanghai, has spent the better part of his career unpacking this process to better understand what has taken place.

Counterview

Search This Blog