Skip to main content

Increasing campus crackdown: Why ruling classes fear and attack higher education?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak
 
The increasing attacks on higher educational institutions and universities reflect a deeper malaise within the ruling classes. President Donald Trump’s criticisms of American universities and attacks on universities such as Columbia and Harvard, along with the BJP led Indian government's actions under Prime Minister Narendra Modi targeting institutions like Jawaharlal Nehru University, the University of Hyderabad, and Jadavpur University, are notable examples of the growing threats faced by centers of learning and inquiry. 
These examples are not limited to the United States and India; universities across Europe and other regions are also facing similar threats from ruling elites. These threats extend beyond funding cuts, political intimidation, bureaucratic harassment, government and legal pressure. Students, teachers, and researchers are increasingly facing physical danger—not only to their lives and livelihoods but also to their passionate commitment to the production and dissemination of knowledge. 
The Education Under Attack 2024 report, published by the Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack (GCPEA), revealed that approximately 6,000 attacks on educational institutions occurred in 2022 and 2023—representing a nearly 20 percent increase compared to the previous two years. More than 10,000 students, teachers, and academics were harmed, injured, or killed in these incidents, many of which took place in regions affected by wars and armed conflict.
Historically, attacks on intellectuals and institutions of higher learning are nothing new. Feudal landlords, monarchs, colonial rulers, reactionary religious forces, and dominant ruling classes have long felt threatened by reason, science, and secular knowledge that challenge prevailing power structures. Universities and institutions of higher education have traditionally served as spaces for emancipatory, independent, and critical thinking—forms of thought that inherently question and resist hegemonic authority and status quo. These institutions not only produce and disseminate knowledge but also play a vital role in deepening democracy and advancing decolonisation. 
The scientific ethos and egalitarian culture that define higher education are often deeply unsettling for ruling elites, as they disrupt entrenched hierarchies and systems of control. The current wave of attacks on universities, higher educational institutions, and the very idea of higher education draws its strength from a long historical lineage of ruling-class assaults on spaces of critical thought.
The new wave of attacks on universities and higher institutions of learning began with the commodification, commercialisation, marketisation, privatisation, and modularisation of higher education. This was followed by a systematic effort to undermine the humanities, social sciences, and liberal arts—disciplines increasingly devalued under the pretext of employability and the utilitarian logic of skill-based knowledge transfer. 
These assaults were not accidental but carefully orchestrated to align education with the needs of capitalism and the ruling classes. The aim was to reshape universities into institutions that produce a compliant workforce stripped of the capacity to critically examine exploitative working conditions or challenge systemic inequalities. Governments and university administrations have, to a large extent, succeeded in this endeavour by closing down departments and programs in the humanities, social sciences, and liberal arts.
Although states, governments, funding bodies, and university leadership have succeeded in weakening the production of emancipatory knowledge, they have failed to extinguish the youthful spirit, independence, egalitarian values, secular environment, and critical ethos that continue to thrive in campuses and classrooms. Within these spaces, teachers and researchers persist in producing and disseminating knowledge that promotes scientific consciousness—one that empowers people to resist the bigotry and control of the ruling classes. 
Despite the antagonistic environment shaped by a compliance-driven culture of surveillance over students and faculty, smear campaigns branding university communities as radical, leftist, elitist, or anti-national, and the systematic curbing of academic freedom through funding cuts, students and staff have continued to defy these pressures. The students and staffs have refused to transform their universities into machineries of compliance. They remain committed to generating knowledge and cultivating consciousness that challenge conformity and promote emancipatory praxis. 
So, the renewed intensity in attacks on higher educational institutions, universities, and intellectuals reflects a deeper malaise within the ruling classes—one rooted in insecurity, fear of dissent, and an urgent drive to consolidate ideological control. This broader assault reveals a fundamental truth: the ruling elites no longer trust their ability to maintain legitimacy through democratic consent. Instead, they turn to coercion and control, enforcing a culture of compliance aimed at dismantling critical thought and silencing those who dare to question or challenge the status quo.
What ruling classes fear is not merely academic critique, but education itself—as a democratising force capable of awakening political consciousness, empowering people to interrogate systems and conditions of exploitation, and imagine just, alternative futures. By silencing campuses, the ruling classes seek to silence the future—eroding democratic rights and reinforcing a social, political, economic and cultural order grounded in inequality and repression.
History bears witness to the vital role that universities, institutions of higher learning, and intellectuals have played in the revolutionary upsurges of societies against patriarchy, feudalism, monarchy, colonialism, apartheid, capitalism, and imperialism. The more repression is imposed, the more it fuels tireless and enduring resistance—resistance that persists until power is ultimately challenged, overturned and defeated. Therefore, let universities, institutions of learning and their campuses stand as territories of resistance—spaces where the struggle for a progressive transformation of society takes root, aiming to build a future free from all forms of inequality and exploitation. True knowledge does not domesticate—it emancipates.

Comments

TRENDING

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Election bells ringing in Nepal: Can ousted premier Oli return to power?

By Nava Thakuria*  Nepal is preparing for a national election necessitated by the collapse of KP Sharma Oli’s government at the height of a Gen Z rebellion (youth uprising) in September 2025. The polls are scheduled for 5 March. The Himalayan nation last conducted a general election in 2022, with the next polls originally due in 2027.  However, following the dissolution of Nepal’s lower house of Parliament last year by President Ram Chandra Poudel, the electoral process began under the patronage of an interim government installed on 12 September under the leadership of retired Supreme Court judge Sushila Karki. The Hindu-majority nation of over 29 million people will witness more than 3,400 electoral candidates, including 390 women, representing 68 political parties as well as independents, vying for 165 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital.