Skip to main content

Why there is really 'no established need' in India for genetic modification of mustard

By Rosamma Thomas* 

On October 18, 2022 the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee, India’s regulatory body for gene technologies, approved genetically modified mustard crop for cultivation in farmers’ fields. In 2002, Proagro Seed Company, a subsidiary of Bayer, had applied for commercial approval of a similar crop. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), at that time, did not find evidence of superior yield in the GM crop and rejected the application.
Hybridization of GM mustard is made possible by two genes, the sterility gene barnase and fertility restorer barstar, derived from soil bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. The gene is a patented technology of Bayer Crop Science. If Bayer owns the patent of the genes used in the mustard developed by scientists at Delhi University led by Prof Deepak Pental, how could it be termed ‘swadeshi’? Royalty payments will need to be paid to Bayer, and this detail is not in the public domain.
There are also questions about claims of more abundant crop from this “new” mustard, which in turn is expected to reduce India’s dependence on import of cooking oil. However, the new crop will need use of glufosinate herbicide, which too will benefit Bayer. Even the development of this crop flies in the face of India’s pesticide regulations. GM mustard has also not been tested as a herbicide tolerant crop.
The major mustard growing parts of the country were all earlier opposed to GM mustard, and field trials were not allowed. Lakhs of bee-keepers depend on mustard for their harvest of honey; the mustard leaves are cooked, and oilseed cake is used in organic farming, and the oil is used in Ayurveda. Such a crop cannot be exploited for genetic engineering without setting off likely unpredictable changes affecting the ecology, livelihoods and health.
GM technology is irreversible and uncontrollable once it is released in the environment. Given the lack of safety tests to the environment and human health, there are calls on the government to reverse its decision. GM mustard would be the first food crop to receive such clearance in India – the only other GM crop currently cultivated is cotton, and BT cotton has fallen far short of what was earlier promised – the BT cotton areas of Vidarbha in Maharashtra have seen a large number of farmer suicides.
In a letter to the Union minister of Environment Bhupender Yadav, Ashwini Mahajan of the Swadeshi Jagran Manch pointed out that gluphosinate, much like glyphosate, is dangerous to human and environmental health. It is the non-GM tag on Indian food products that makes produce from India attractive to European buyers. Over five lakh crore of Indian food products are currently exported, and the ill-considered introduction of GM mustard could adversely affect exports.
Aruna Rodrigues, who has petitioned the Supreme Court seeking a moratorium on environmental release of genetically modified organisms in the absence of comprehensive, transparent and rigorous biosafety protocols, has shown that there is really no established “need” for the genetic modification of the mustard, a diverse crop that is also native to India. Claims of higher yield have been questioned, since the crops used to compare the yield were not suited for the purpose.
Mustard has a small seed and sticky pollen, which gives it the potential to disperse far. In her petition, she explained that India’s biodiversity was at stake; “if the GM ‘genie’ escapes, it cannot be bottled again.” In a briefing that she prepared for anyone interested, Rodrigues explained that mustard is among the oldest traditional crops of India, with rice, and India is a centre of origin of mustard. The oil is used in Ayurveda, and the monounsaturated oil remains stable under high temperature while used in cooking.
The section on environmental and health harms from the briefing Rodgriues prepared is worth quoting in full:
“5. Impacts: Environmental and Health
(a) Contamination is the outstanding concern: The Regulators have paid lip service to the 301 st Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) Report (2017), which states at Pr. 52: “The Ministry informed the Committee that biodiversity preservation is unanimously considered a priority by the scientific community and society at large”; and the NBPGR (National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources) says: “India possesses rich diversity of oilseed brassicas. Brassica rapavar. toria, B. rapavar. brown sarson and B. Juncea considered to be native of Indian gene centre (Arora, 1988)”.
(b) There are two important specifics i.e.: first, mustard like rape more than other crops, has particular potential for wide dispersal through gene flow, insect mediated and wind, (because of its “small seed size and sticky pollen which insects love” - Bayer) To elucidate, the Canadian canola crop (rape) extends over some 5 million hectares, of which roughly 60% is planted with transgenic varieties. But, virtually all canola (97%) is now GM and organic grain farmers in the Prairies have largely stopped growing canola due to high levels of GM contamination. Studies have found that canola pollen can travel nearly 3 km. second, the contamination in the US from a single field trial in 2001 of Bayer Rice LL601 has particular relevance to mustard. Rice is also self-pollinating But mustard outcrosses quite well (18 %+). Contrast this to the large scale BRL trials for HT mustard (2010-2015) and the 5 acre-at-a-time ‘creeping commercialisation’ plan for India.
(c) The proven unsustainability of HT crops: HT crops are proven to be an unsustainable agri- technology. First planted in the US, the country that invented GMOs, US data of HT crops after more than 20 years of commercial planting proves their unsustainability (USDA data 2012: This is also true of the Argentina in the matter of HT soy. This is a failed technology, which spawns super weeds, higher herbicide use and no added performance yield). The US National Academy of Science in 2016, admitted yield stagnation in GM maize, cotton and (HT) soybean (pr.43(b) of IA No. 121953/2018).
(d) The Toxicity of Herbicides used in HT Crops means that they are pesticidal crops: HT crops should be tested as pesticidal crops but are not. The sprays include surfactants that force both weeds and the HT crop to absorb significant quantities of the herbicide that is sprayed on them. The resistant crop stands. Everything else dies including non- target organisms.
(e) Roundup (Glyphosate): The IARC and California Law Suit: In the aftermath of the IARC Report (July 2015) (International Agency for Research on Cancer of the WHO), categorising Monsanto’s 80% brand leader Glyphosate, (considered the safest herbicide in the world) as a “Probable human carcinogen” and “sufficiently demonstrated for genotoxicity (damage to DNA)in animals” (Group 2A, its second highest categorisation, (ref Additional Affidavit of 2015, Annexure P- 3), California’s EPA has labelled Monsanto’s ‘Roundup’ (active ingredient glyphosate), as a ‘known human carcinogen’ under the State’s Proposition 65. “The state based its decision on the findings of the world’s most reliable, transparent and science-based assessment of glyphosate” (i.e. the IARC Report). (Ref Rejoinder of 2017 at pr. 11.3).
(f) California Law Suit finds Monsanto Guilty: The IARC report findings include a linking of glyphosate to Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; and it has now figured prominently in the Dewayne Johnson case, which was brought to trial speedily in May 2018, because he has been diagnosed with terminal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, as a result of spraying the weed-killing pesticide RoundUp Ready. The verdict in this case was announced on 10 August 2018. It found “clear and convincing evidence” that Monsanto’s officials acted with “malice or oppression” in failing to adequately warn of the risks. Monsanto’s secretive strategies were undone by the words of its own scientists, “the damning truth illuminated through the company’s emails, internal strategy reports and other communications”. Monsanto must pay $289 million in damages. The case has opened a Pandora’s Box with 5000 similar law suits waiting in the wings (Application IA No. 121953/2018 at prs. 41 &42).
Update: 2022: There are more than 80,000 case winding their way through US Courts on cancers linked to Glyphosate.
Aruna Rodrigues
(g) Commonality with Petitioners Submissions: It is noteworthy in this connection that Petitioners have insistently prayed for a ban on HT crops for several years, the TEC, appointed pursuant to orders of this Hon’ble Court, having recommended such a ban in 2013. Furthermore, there are specific ‘commonalities’ with the findings of the above legal case and the sheer depth of evidence in Petitioners various Submissions, especially in the wake of the feckless and fraudulent regulatory oversight of HT mustard and its approval now, to commercialise it. For example, the case findings include:
(i) the warning signs seen in scientific research dated back to the early 1980s and have only increased over the decades. But, instead Monsanto worked not to warn users or redesign its products, but to create its own science, designed to appear independent and thus, more credible, to show they were safe and
(ii) how closely the company had worked with the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) officials to promote the safety message and suppress evidence of harm. Petitioners evidence in keeping with the above is that Glyphosate is an endocrine disruptor and causes birth defects; that as in the case of the tobacco lobby, which hid tobacco’s link to lung cancer for 40 years, that similarly Monsanto, and the EPA, have both known for over 30 years that glyphosate and its formulations cause cancer.
(h) Toxicity Specific to Glufosinate Ammonium: Ubiquitous Glyphosate used for over 40 years worldwide, is supposed to be the safest herbicide. Glufosinate is acknowledged as more toxic than glyphosate and like it, is a systemic, broad spectrum, non-selective herbicide (because it kills indiscriminately, soil organisms, beneficial insects etc). It is an acknowledged neurotoxin (causes nerve damage) and birth defects and is damaging to most plants that it comes into contact with. The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) classifies glufosinate ammonium as "persistent"; and 'mobile'. Studies demonstrate that it causes adverse health effects in animal studies, is likely to leach into drinking water sources, could increase nitrate leaching, and is toxic to beneficial soil micro-organisms. The US EPA has stated that glufosinate is "expected to adversely affect non- target terrestrial plant species". It is banned in Europe and not permitted in India, under the Insecticide Act for mustard. It is an organophosphorus compound (toxic to biology), very similar in structure to glyphosate. Glufosinate “has been clearly implicated in brain developmental abnormalities in animal studies and is very persistent in the environment, so it will certainly contaminate water supplies in addition to food where it will be absorbed. Also the chemicals in the formulation that will be sprayed are known to be toxic. As weeds become more resistant (they will eventually be resistant to all known herbicides)”. Bayer’s data sheet confirms its status as a neurotoxin. (ref. Rejoinder of 2017 pr. 1.4)
Update: The ban in the EU may not now, in 2022 be in force, but indicated in the future. The reports of harm, health and environmental, from Glyphosate have increased substantially and become more serious in the last 4-5 years.
(i) Harm -- Finally Antibiotic Resistance: Prof Jack Heinemann: In view of the importance of this study I’m reproducing sections of the Affidavit without paraphrasing the findings, they are that important. Furthermore, India is reported to have amongst the highest levels of antibiotic resistance in her population, in the world. The impacts then are unacceptably serious.
A peer reviewed study by Jack Heinemann et al titled ‘Exposure to Herbicides can Cause Change in Bacterial Response to Antibiotics’: Sub-lethal exposure to the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and glyphosate’, 24 March 2015 published in The American Society for Microbiology. The study found that the most-used herbicides (including Glyphosate) can induce “a multiple-antibiotic resistance phenotype in potential pathogens.” In other words, the use of herbicides can cause bacteria to develop resistance to clinically- relevant antibiotics. The effect occurs upon simultaneous exposure to antibiotics and is faster than the lethal effect of antibiotics. The expression ‘Simultaneous’ has been used to signify that the bacteria need not have had a history of exposure to herbicide to acquire resistance to antibiotics. The resistance can arise immediately. So it can happen if someone is exposed to spray drift, or pets their cat that walked through a treated lawn. Most other forms of antibiotic resistance require some history of exposure before the bacteria are in the human being. For example, penicillin resistant bacteria are resistant because they come from populations of bacteria that arose by mutation and selection for penicillin resistance and then transferred to people. The study therefore, cautioned that “induced response may undermine antibiotic therapy and substantially increase the probability of spontaneous mutation to higher levels of resistance.” [See Annex. P-6 | Add. Affidavit (14.09.2015)]
To reiterate and briefly, no amount of ‘deliberations’ can resolve the problems demonstrated in the risk assessment farm protocols for Mustard, and the known harm that is certain after 25 years of commercialisation in the US, and Argentina. Antibiotic resistance should be the final nail on the coffin on HT crops including Mustard , but a delinquent Regulator is instead working to resurrect it.”
Despite the resistance, the government is pushing ahead. An announcement was made that GM mustard would be planted in the current rabi season in 100 places in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana. Farmer unions, however, are mobilizing in protest. A press release from the All India Kisan Sabha on October 31, 2022 mentioned that highly toxic herbicides are now more widely used across India. “Multinational agrochemical producers like Bayer, in connivance with a vast network of pesticide dealers, con the farmers into using expensive and extremely toxic pesticides,” the release said, calling on the government for transparency and rigorous scientific evidence to support its claims. “The BJP government must come clear and address all concerns and not rush into any commercial release of GM mustard,” AIKS said.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Corporate-political party nexus? Rise and rise of Gautam Adani under Modi regime

By Sandeep Pandey*  In last five years Rs 10,09,510 crore taken as loans by various companies from banks in India have been declared as Non Performing Assets, an euphemism for writing them off. Out of this State Bank of India alone wrote off Rs 2,04,486 crore. Only about 13% of the total written off amount was recovered. Identity of the defaulting borrowers, most of whom are influential corporates, is not revealed. Compare this to the loans taken by farmers. The names of defaulting farmers is displayed on walls in tehsil offices to shame them and some unlucky ones also land up in lock-ups there. On the contrary, a few corporate defaulters have fled the country and quite curiously the authorities didn’t seize their passports like they do with some dissenting intellectuals or activists booked under mostly false cases. Now consider the donations received by political parties in the form of electoral bonds. The identity of the donor need not be revealed even to the Election Commission or i

'Extremist' US Hindu global group funding hate against Indian Churches: NGO groups

Counterview Desk  As many as 14 civil rights and faith-based organizations in co-signing a letter to the US Senators, Representatives, State Governor, and other elected officials have demanded the FBI, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and Department of Justice should investigate into Texas-based organization Global Hindu Heritage Foundation (GHHF) a fundraiser campaign for demolishing churches in India. Co-signed by Federation of Indian American Christian Organization in North America (FIACONA), North American Church of God, Southern Methodist University (SMU) Human Rights Program, Amnesty International - Dallas, World Without Genocide, Center for Pluralism, Genocide Watch, The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), Limitless Church, Justice for All, Hindu for Human Rights, North Texas Peace Advocates, Good Citizens of DFW, and the North Texas Islamic Council, the letter has been sent to Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz; Representatives Michael C Burgess, Pat Fallon, Van Taylor, Terr

Carbon abatement to tackle climate change: India's failure has 'outpaced' its success

By Satorupa Karmakar*  On November 01, 2021, India took a pledge of reaching a carbon-zero stage by 2070, at the COP-26 held in Glasgow, UK. As ‘ambitious’ and dubious it may sound to some, with a short-term delay in renewable energy generation (which gained the pace post-September 2020) and drastic fall in greenhouse gas (GHG) emission level as COVID-19 emerged as a ‘necessary evil’ , the path of India’s clean energy mission could be seen being paved throughout this time. Currently ranked as the third largest GHG emitter in the world, India is projected to demand more energy in coming years due to a large population base (1.3 billion as per 2011 Census data) and primarily coal-based fast-growing economy. Rapid industrialisation in post-colonial developing countries like India, stimulated by a larger and cheaper pool of fossil fuels and labour-force depicted a continuous upsurge in temperature, heavy precipitation in some places with an overall declining rainfall and a burgeoning soc

BJP-RSS trap opposition in 'futile row' around Savarkar, freedom movement

By Prem Singh*  Everything in this article is just a repetition. I have been saying all this since 1991-92. It is obvious that the Congress and the RSS/BJP do not like my ideas. But most socialists, advocates of social justice and communists also dislike my thoughts. I watch their measures and efforts to deal with the present crisis with interest. I respect them and also participate. Yet, the fact it, we fall behind again and again, and the crisis goes ahead. Instead of being a solution-providers, we are seen to be a part of the crisis. How long will this last? Perhaps, if the new generation thinks differently, things may turn for better! 1 To say that modern Indian society and politics are passing through the deepest crisis ever will surely be a repetition. The crisis is deeper than the spreading of communal hatred we witness around us. In fact, the business of communal hatred is flourishing by taking its manure and water from the deep crisis. The crisis of neo-colonial slavery is pro

Demand to withdraw 'anti-environment, anti-adivasi' forest conservation rules 2022

By Gopinath Majhi*  The Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), Odisha, a coalition of adivasis and forest dwellers’ organisations, has sent a memorandum to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) raising serious concerns over Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2022, notified by the Centre on June 29.  Contending that recent amendments and a host of executive orders/guidelines issued by the ministry undermine and dilute the FRA and threaten the rights of adivasis and forest dwellers, CSD demands that the 2022 FC Rules should be rescinded forthwith. Demanding withdrawal of such anti-people and anti-environment rules CSD Odisha organised a protest Dharana in front of State Assembly today on 25th November 2022 and submitted memorandums to the Hon’ble Governor of Odisha, Chief Secretary and Commissioner-cum-Secretary, ST & SC Development Department for conveying our concerns against the FC Rules 2022 to the Central Government for its withdrawal. The memorandums w

'Unprecedented rise' of attacks on students of Delhi university by ABVP condemned

Counterview Desk  A statement, sent as an email alert by "concerned teachers and students of Delhi University", referring to a protest organised against the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad's (ABVP's), has alleged “brutal” attack on students and teachers demanding the release of civil rights leader Prof GN Saibaba and others from “unjust incarceration.” “We are seeing an unprecedented rise of attacks on the students of our university by the fascist ABVP goons. Almost every week we see our fellow students and activists getting attacked physically by the lackeys of this current Brahmanical Hindutva fascist regime”, the statement claimed. Text : A joint protest was organised by the students and teachers of Delhi University on 2nd of December against the brutal attack by ABVP goons. On 1st of December, activists of Bhagat Singh Chatra Ekta Manch (bsCEM), Lawyers Against Atrocities (LAA) and many other organisations as a part of Campaign Against State Repression (CASR),

Never-ending saga of sin tax: What if murder is taxed at Rs 1 crore, rape at Rs 5 crore?

By Moses Raj GS, Sangeetha Thomas*  What should have ended by June 30, 2022 as a 5 year experiment has resurfaced. The government has extended the levy of GST compensation cess by another 4 years till March 31, 2026. This cess, dubbed as the sin tax imposed on sin(ful) goods, is double the highest slab on indirect taxes. But only a few pay for it and the majority benefit, unendingly. The year 2017 is a landmark year for indirect taxes. With the grand idea of ‘One Nation, One Tax’ as a fiscal slogan subsuming all State based taxes such as octroi /entry tax, Value Added Tax (VAT), sales tax, taxes on lottery, betting and gambling, luxury tax, purchase tax, entertainment tax, property tax, professional tax and central sales tax into a single framework of Goods and Services Tax (GST) changed the contours of revenue collection. Complicating it further, India, with each State having its own size and revenue problems, has the most complex and highly centralised indirect tax structure in the w

Muslims, Dalits off Bangladesh border 'don't have acess to' water, power, farmland

Counterview Desk  Kirity Roy, secretary, civil rights group Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), in a letter to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission, has revealed how, even after 75 years of Independence, Muslims and Dalits living next to the India-Bangladesh border do not have access to electricity, drinking water, even to their own land. Stating that the “horrible situation” has due to “illegal restriction on the agricultural activities” imposed by the Border Security Force (BSF), plunging “farmers and their families into deeper poverty”, the letter, referring to the plight of 1,200 people reside in the Changmari village, states, There are about 200 acres of cultivable lands out of 3,500 acres is situated beyond the border fence. “The ingress and egress of the farmers to their own agricultural land through the fencing gates are regulated by the BSF. The soil and climate of this region is very suitable for jute and maize cultivation”, it adds. Text: This letter is

Climate change 'can't be fought' with fancy issues: re-engineering cities, green energy

By Shankar Sharma*  "The Hindu" has carried a discussion paper in the form of an interview, Can poor countries afford to go green? Many such articles/ opinion pieces are making the grievous mistake of ignoring a fundamental question: what is the true cost of climate change (CC), and can poor countries, or for that matter any community, afford not to do all that is feasible to address the threats of  CC; instead of wasting our time and resources in endlessly deliberating on the so called "financial/economic costs" of the much needed transition. Such articles seem to focus only on high profile / glamorous/ debatable stuff, and ignore the basic issues which we all can do something or the other to minimise the impacts of CC in the short-term, and which may probably lead to long term solution. The opinion pieces/ discussion, as above, are guilty of conveniently ignoring the basic question: what is the fundamental cause of CC? The answer should be: the unsustainable dema

Nullifying environmental release, uproot GM mustard plants: 111 doctors urge Modi

Counterview Desk  In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as many as 111 medical professionals , most of them senior doctors, has expressed concern with regard to human health implications of the genetically modified (GM) herbicide tolerant (HT) mustard that got approved by Government of India, with indications that it has already been planted in at least six locations. Floated by Dr Rupal M Dalal, a Mumbai-based pediatrician, the letter, even as “welcoming” Modi’s “unprecedented push” towards non-chemical farming in the country for the benefit of environment, nature, consumers and farmers, it said, “HT GM mustard will push the country in the opposite direction.” “A herbicide tolerant crop will put an end to diversity-based cropping, which is important not just for soil health but human health and expose consumers and farmers to a toxic herbicide with serious long term health implications”, it added. The letter seeks the Prime Minister’s urgent intervention to not only withdraw th