Skip to main content

Azamgarh international airport on 670 acres opposed: 10,000 people to be displaced

By Rajeev Yadav, Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* 

Azamgarh is a lively district of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Because of the entrepreneurial nature of people here Azamgarh is described as Kerala of U.P. People from here not only go to different parts of the country but also to abroad. Descendent of an indentured labourer family from here who migrated to Trinidad and Tobago, Basudeo Pandey, became the Prime Minister of this group of islands country in the Caribbean. Most of the people who migrated from Azamgarh in the past did not use an airport.
Now there is a proposal to expand the Azamgarh airstrip to an international airport. This will displace about ten thousand people over 670 acres land covering eight villages – Hasanpur, Kadipur Harikesh, Jamua Hariram, Jamua Jolha, Gadanpur Chindan Patti, Manduri, Jigina Karampur and Jehra Pipri. This land is very fertile. 
Firstly, people are asking when there are international airports in Varanasi, Kushinagar, Gorakhpur, Ayodhya and now even Lucknow, distance to which has been reduced to 2.5 hours by newly constructed Purvanchal Expressway, in the vicinity of Azamgarh then what is the need of an airport here and secondly, even if an airport was to be built why such fertile land was chosen instead of some barren one? 
People are also asking that when the government is handing over airports at other places to Adani why is it interested in constructing one in Azamgarh? Or, will this one be handed over to Adani too? If this is the case then Adani should himself build the airport by buying land from farmers. Why should the government acquire land and then offer it over to a capitalist at concessional rates?
When the district administration tried to get a survey done surreptitiously on the night of 12-13 October, the people opposed it and asked when they did not want to give up the land where was the need to do a survey? The police accompanying the revenue officials misbehaved with women. 
Then the government tried to terrorise the people by putting pressure on Gram Pradhans. The Gram Pradhan of Jamua Hariran was threatened with false cases and was made to sit at police station while the survey was attempted in the villages, but he refused to budge. 
On one occasion when police wanted to carry him away in their jeep, the woman encircled the vehicle and wouldn’t allow it to leave the village. The police then had to let him go. He told the police as a matter of fact that when his village will vanish then which village will he be the Gram Pradhan of? He said he could not go against the wishes of people. When Hasanpur Gram Pradhan was summoned to the police station he refused to go there in the night.
When the government proposes to build this airport in the name of development why is it compelled to use coercive measures? What kind of development is it which has to be thrust upon the people against their wishes?
Local newspapers have reported that the district administration had conducted a survey and submitted its report to the government. Villagers are asking that when they have not allowed any survey to take place then what report has been submitted by the district officials to the government in Lucknow?
If we give it a thought only well off people will use air travel. People who can afford it can very well catch their flights from the Varanasi airport, a two hours journey away, or the Lucknow airport, a two and a half hours journey away. Most people travelling out of Azamgarh use railways. Hence from common people’s point of view what is required is more trains and more coaches in which people can travel comfortably. 
Presently people have to travel long distances in general or sleeper coaches in inhuman conditions. Post Covid the general class has been removed from most trains restricting the space for common people’s train travel. So, ironically, the cheapest means of travel is being eliminated and a much costlier means in sought to be introduced. Can this be called ‘development’ especially of the ‘Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas’ kind which is loudly claimed by the Bhartiya Janata Party government? 
If we take a look at the newly built Yamuna Expressway between Lucknow and eastern U.P. we’ll hardly find any vehicles plying on this. This implies that common people are not using the high speed travel or find it unaffordable to use it. For the people who can afford, more options are being created. This is a classic example of capitalist development.
Higher the speed of travel more will be the pollution. For the same distance air travel will be more polluting than by train or bus. European teenager activist Greta Thunberg who is leading a global campaign against climate change has taken a personal decision not to travel by air. She has convinced her mother also to do likewise. Inspired by her number of people in Europe have switched to rail travel from airplanes. When Greta had to travel to United Nations to address a session she chose to travel by ship like is olden days. Europe has decided to be carbon neutral by 2050. India has set a deadline of 2070.
Promoting high speed travel and building plethora of airports like railway stations and bus stands in the name of development is essentially a capitalist ploy to make as much profit in the shortest possible time on the petroleum reserves of earth before the carbon emission restrictions are strictly enforced, of which the common people are unwittingly becoming a part.
We have to understand how the world is changing in response to the existential threat of climate change. A section of the developed world is more conscious about their lifestyles and trying to reduce their carbon footprints whereas India and China pursue the same path of development which is responsible for dangerous carbon emissions. 
In a way we are hurting ourselves by making life more difficult for future generations. The cost of our misdeed will have to be borne by our descendent.
---
*Rajeev Yadav is social-political activist based in Azamgarh; Arundhati Dhuru is associated with National Alliance of People’s Movements; Sandeep Pandey, Magsaysay award winning social activist, is General Secretary, Socialist Party (India)

Comments

bernard kohn said…
very very good example of totally useless expenditures...yf

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs. 

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.