Skip to main content

EWS reservation creates parallel structure inside quota mould, promotes caste system

CPIML Liberation statement on Supreme Court judgement upholding Modi government 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) aimed at providing reservation for forward castes:
***
The recent Supreme Court judgement upholding Modi government 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) aimed at providing reservation for forward castes clearly violates the objective and purpose of reservation embedded in the basic spirit of the Indian constitution. The judgement only solidifies the historic injustice against deprived sections. The same was reiterated by Justice S Ravindra Bhat, who gave a dissenting judgement, along with CJI UU Lalit in the EWS reservation judgement who held that: “… this court has for the first time, in the seven decades of the republic, sanctioned an avowedly exclusionary and discriminatory principle. Our Constitution does not speak the language of exclusion. In my considered opinion, the amendment, by the language of exclusion, undermines the fabric of social justice, and thereby, the basic structure.”
When the Indian constitution was taking shape and form as we know today, the reservation policy for deprived sections was woven into it to build an egalitarian India. The same is reflected in the preamble to the Indian constitution which assures “Equality of Status and Opportunity”. Thousands of years of caste based discrimination had pushed deprived sections like OBCs, Dalits and Adivasis into the periphery of the society stripping them of all rights and access. In fact, the word reservation translates to representation, with the spirit to provide representation and equal access to those who have been left out due to historic injustice and discrimination. The same was reiterated in the dissenting judgement as follows: “the total and absolute exclusion of constitutionally recognised backward classes of citizens - and more acutely, SC and ST communities, is nothing but discrimination which reaches to the level of undermining, and destroying the equality code, and particularly the principle of non-discrimination”
The skewed SC judgement is clearly aloof from the ground reality of Indian caste system and its manifestation in everyday lives of deprived communities. The affirmative action or reservation for “backward” communities as mentioned in the constitution and discussed at length in the constitutional assembly debates of November 1948, was intended not as a method of poverty alleviation but for achieving social justice. The SC judgement thus squarely violates the basic spirit of Indian constitution.
In January 2019, just before the general elections Modi government had introduced the move to implement the EWS reservation with parliament enacting the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019. This enabled the State to make reservations in higher education and matters of public employment on the basis of economic criteria alone. The Act amended Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution by inserting 15(6) and 16(6) to include reservation for the forward castes.
This is aimed at undermining the SC/ST/OBC quotas, as the RSS has been demanding for long. In fact, Justice Bela Trivedi and Justice Pardiwala, who formed the majority opinion with Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, have both in their concurring opinions called for reservations to be reviewed and time limits be prescribed for their continuation. As it is, the system of reservations has been increasingly marked by delays, loopholes and non-implementation, and is now being undermined by sweeping privatisation in education and employment.
The Constitution recognises social and educational backwardness alone to be the criterion for reservations. In other words, the Constitution recognises the principle that reservations are not a tool to address economic deprivation - they can only address (to an extent) systematic social and educational discrimination and exclusion. The claim that the upper castes, even those who are poor, face systematic discrimination, exclusion, and underrepresentation in education and jobs does not bear scrutiny. Joblessness and poverty are a separate problem that can only be addressed by the creation of jobs and better wages - and the Modi Government has signally failed on this front.
The 10% EWS reservation is in reality a misnomer, it is reservation solely for forward castes aimed at diluting the affirmative action policies for deprived sections. Indeed Dalits, Adivasis and OBCs are explicitly excluded from claiming EWS reservation. Even the eligibility cut-off itself is sham. According to the rules framed for implementation of EWS reservation in education and jobs, the eligibility is annual income of 8 lakhs i.e. Rs. about 67,000/- a month. This makes a mockery of the immense poverty of oppressed communities caused by the historical injustice of caste. The criteria renders the definition of ‘poverty’ meaningless, and fails to effectively target the poor and unemployed among the upper castes.
Modi is by far not the first to moot the idea of a quota for the economically deprived in the non-SC-ST-OBC quota jobs and educational seats. The Narasimha Rao Government introduced a similar measure in 1991, reserving 10% Government posts for “other economically backward sections of the people who are not covered by any existing schemes of reservation”. A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court struck down that measure, observing that poverty alone cannot be the test of backwardness, and holding that social and educational backwardness was the only Constitutional basis for reservations.
The question of social justice and reservation are intertwined and thus can’t be viewed as separate entities. The idea of affirmative action or representation for SCs and STs was core to Dr. BR Ambedkar’s vision of social justice and social mobility for deprived communities. On one hand, the Modi government and RSS are busy appropriating Ambedkar, while on other, they reject his basic thinking on the need for reservations for oppressed castes.
The EWS reservation, thus creates a parallel structure inside the reservation mould, with the clear purpose of introducing a caste system and solidifying the discrimination against historically deprived sections of the society.
The Modi government, which completely failed in generating new jobs and reviving the economy is using EWS reservation as a desperate deflection tactic. The jobs are not eaten away by affirmative action, as Modi and RSS wants people to believe. The jobs, like people’s lives, are being sacrificed by the government at the altar of corporate profiteering and their looting of the country's resources. Today, the unemployment rate in India has surged to 7.77%, with more people being daily rendered jobless and pushed into poverty.
We must strongly oppose the 10% EWS reservation, as it is a gross violation of the spirit of the constitution and a mockery of the principle of social justice. The fight against poverty requires more jobs and economic revival that can only be achieved by putting a halt to the Modi government’s pro-corporate and privatisation spree.

Comments

TRENDING

'Wedding of the century': What does Mukesh Ambani want to prove by such extravaganza?

By NS Venkataraman*  Mukesh  Ambani,   a renowned Indian industrialist who is said to be the richest person in India and  one of the richest persons in the world,   has just now conducted the wedding celebration of  his son in Mumbai,   with unheard level of lavishness in India.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

'Anti-poor stand': Even British wouldn't reduce Railways' sleeper and general coaches

By Anandi Pandey, Sandeep Pandey*  Probably even the British, who introduced railways in India, would not have done what the Bhartiya Janata Party government is doing. The number of Sleeper and General class coaches in various trains are surreptitiously and ominously disappearing accompanied by a simultaneous increase in Air Conditioned coaches. In the characteristic style of BJP government there was no discussion or debate on this move by the Indian Railways either in the Parliament or outside of it. 

'28% rise in sedition cases': Top global NGO alliance rates India's civil space 'repressed'

By Rajiv Shah Rating India's civic space as repressed , Civicus, a global civil society alliance, in its new report submitted to the UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) on the state of civic space in the country has said that the use of sedition law against the Modi government’s critics continues. "Under the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sedition cases have increased by 28 per cent with over 500 cases against more than 7,000 people", it says.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

How embracing diversity enriched my life, brought profound sense of joy

By Mike Ghouse*  If you can shed the bias towards others, you'll love the connections with every human that God or his systems have created. This gives a sense of freedom and brings meaning and joy to life. Embracing and respecting how people dress, eat, and practice their beliefs becomes an enriching experience.

How US is using Tibetans to provoke conflict with China 'ignoring' India

By Lobsang Tenzin*  On July 12, US President Joe Biden signed the Resolve Tibet Act, and Tibetans cheered for it, believing that the law promotes a resolution of the dispute between Tibet and China. Is this true? First, let's look at the issue of the ownership of Tibet. 

Post-poll mob lynching spree, bulldozer justice: NAPM seeks united resistance

Counterview Desk  Condemning what it calls "the horrific spree of mob lynchings across the country after the Lok Sabha election results", India's premier civil society network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), has called for "united resistance" against "hateful communal politics, mob lynching of religious minorities and caste-based oppression".

Banned Maoist party protests in Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, claims support across globe

By Harsh Thakor*  Despite being a banned and designated as terrorist organisation under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act since 2009, the Communist Party of India (Maoist) is said to have successfully implemented a one-day bandh across Kolhan division in Jharkhand on July 10th, with repurcussions in the neighbouring Chhattisgarh. The bandh was called to protest against alleged police brutality in the Kolhan-Saranda region.