Skip to main content

Karnataka's Kaiga N-power expansion without 'adequate' risk, cost-benefits analysis

Counterview Desk 

In a representation to the the chairman and members of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), well-known power and climate policy analyst Shankar Sharma has said that the recent approval for the addition of 2*700 MWe nuclear power reactors at Kaiga atomic power plant (APP) in Karnataka has led “to a lot of concern” to those who have a “modest understanding of nuclear power reactor accidents” in Chernobyl and Fukushima.
Sharma said, there are a number of “unanswered questions” with regard to the Kaiga APP among the local people, too, especially over “adequate preparedness on part of the concerned local authorities during a credible scenario of uncontrolled radiation emission beyond the exclusion zone.”


This has reference to a news item that "Senior officers of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) concluded the two-day inspection at Kaiga Atomic Power Station in Karwar" in the Uttara Kannada district of Karnataka state in Sept. 2022.
I am a resident of Shimoga district, which is adjacent to Uttara Kannada district with its HQ at Karwar. I live in a town about 100 km away (aerial distance) from Kaiga APP site, and am naturally concerned about the totally unacceptable impacts of any unfortunate nuclear accident at Kaiga APP. I am an electrical engineer and a power sector professional with over 4 decades of experience in the power sector of India, New Zealand and Australia. I have a modest knowledge of nuclear power technology, and of the credible risks associated with that technology.
With this geographic and professional background, I want to share my views about the Kaiga APP and its general environment with NDMA, so as to assist it with some useful information in discharging its responsibilities.
I would like to start with the NDMA vision, which states: "To build a safer and disaster resilient India by a holistic, proactive, technology driven and sustainable development strategy that involves all stakeholders and fosters a culture of prevention, preparedness and mitigation."
Specifically, the words "pro-active" and "prevention" in this vision are of great appeal to me.
The recent approval for the addition of 2*700 MWe nuclear power reactors at Kaiga APP has led to a lot of concern to the local population, and to those in the state who have a modest understanding of nuclear power reactor accidents, as reported from Chernobyl and Fukushima. 
 My representation dated 23rd December 2018 to Atomic Energy Commission, should emphasise multiple concerns to our people on safety issues, which can be associated with the uncontrolled radiation leakage, along with many other issues of importance to the entire country.
Having gone through that EIA report (Environmental Impact Assessment report) of the proposal on Kaiga APP extension (Units 5 & 6), and having made both the written as well as oral submission at the associated public hearing, I notice that there are many serious concerns to the local stakeholders, as well as for the state and the country as a whole from the proposed project.
My principal concern has been that, whereas 4 nuclear reactors at Kaiga APP have been operating since the last few years, the addition of about 1.6 times the earlier capacity (an increase from about 840 MWe to 2,240 MWe capacity) in the proposed expansion plan will basically mean an exponential increase in "risk" associated with a nuclear reactor accident, the quantum of nuclear radiation leakage even in a normal operating condition, and the quantum of nuclear waste, including the spent nuclear fuels, which will be stored on the site.
Whereas, there have been a number of concerns with the statements made in the EIA report, as prepared for the Project proponent (NPCIL in the present case), the same is found to be seriously deficient in not considering: 
(i) adequate details of disaster management plan to safely evacuate more than 32,000 people of the region and rehabilitate them satisfactorily in the case of any unfortunate nuclear accident of the type noticed at Chernobyl and Fukushima; 
(ii) policy and details associated with the safe disposal and long term storage of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste materials.
A serious issue noticed during the associated public hearing was the number of unanswered questions over the adequate preparedness on part of the concerned local authorities during a credible scenario of uncontrolled radiation emission beyond the exclusion zone, as can be expected in a large size nuclear reactor site such as in Kaiga NPP, and in a scenario similar to what happened in Chernobyl (USSR) and Fukushima (Japan). It has to be emphasised here that none of the concerned authorities, including the local district authorities and AERC, have cared to respond to the associated concerns so far.
Hence, I am appealing to NDMA to consider every one of these concerns with all the seriousness they deserve, and to provide effective assurance to all the stakeholders about the adequacy/ efficacy of the safety precautions taken in this regard.
I notice with a lot of concerns that: whereas, the project proponent, through EIA, seem to have shifted the actual responsibility of off-site emergency measures to the Deputy Commissioner (DC), it should be emphasised that as the district administrator and also as the district magistrate, the DC has enormous and varieties of responsibilities even during normal times. 
It will be seen as the abdication of responsibility on part of the nuclear industry authorities in the country to expect a busy official, such as DC of a district in Karnataka, to appropriately react to a nuclear emergency unless he is ably assisted by a group of competent people, who are well trained and well equipped. EIA has no explanations in this regard.
In the overall context that the area around Kaiga APP is of difficult hilly terrain and is thickly forested, it is important to know: 
  • At what stage of any unfortunate nuclear accident will the affected communities have to be evacuated, and what are the proposed arrangements for the same? 
  •  Where are the hospitals to treat the maximum of 30,252 persons (as per section 3.9 in EIA) and how will these people be evacuated and transported? 
  •  Have all the families who are likely to be affected and their habitats accurately identified, and whether adequate numbers of all-weather roads are available to evacuate them at a short notice, say in mid-rainy season? 
  •  What sort of radioactive danger communication facility to each one of these people is available at present in the unfortunate scenario of a Fukushima type accident? 
  •  Where are the safe nuclear shelters to house these people? 
  •  Are the local authorities such as the Deputy Commissioner, Tahsildars, Panchayats, Doctors, nurses, community leaders etc. trained and provided with necessary equipment to detect any radiation leakage, and to take the necessary safety measures immediately? 
  •  Have a sufficient number of vehicles been identified and available at short notice to evacuate these people to safety? Are all these details properly recorded and made known to the concerned group of officials/people?
If the difficult hilly terrain and thickly forested areas around Kaiga APP, along with a number of rivers and streams, are diligently considered, it can be credibly stated that even with the best intentions/ efforts of SDRF/NDRF, it will not be feasible to safely evacuate even 50% of the 32,000 odd people of the area in the case of a major nuclear accident. Hence, a major catastrophe for the welfare of the local population cannot be credibly ruled out.
NDMA should consider recommending to the Union government not to build additional nuclear power reactors
In this context of a credible and major catastrophe, the words "pro-active" and "prevention" in NDMA vision should indicate that there is a critical need to take all the associated issues into proper perspective, and arrive at rational conclusions.
In the engineering management parlance, the term "risk" can be defined as the product of "the probability of an incident/ event happening" and "cost/ implications of such an incident/ event". In the case of nuclear power reactors, whereas the nuclear power industry maintains that the "probability of an incident/ event happening" is very low, the "cost/ implications of such an incident/ event" can be humongous, as experienced in nuclear disasters at Chernobyl and Fukushima.
Hence, the most innocent question that can be raised in this context is: whether a nuclear power plant, which is credibly associated with not inconsiderable "risk" is essential to our society; certainly in the Indian scenario and even after witnessing multiple nuclear accidents/ incidents including two nuclear disasters at Chernobyl and Fukushima.
If certain analysis tools such as 'risk analysis'; 'costs - benefits analysis'; 'SWOT analysis' etc. are diligently deployed as economic decision making tools, the true costs to our country from a nuclear power plant, as opposed to meager benefits will emerge unambiguously. 
 Whereas the benefit from a nuclear power plant can be a few million units of annual electrical energy, the overall costs to the local communities and to the country as a whole can be humongous: huge capital cost, environmental and health costs, direct and indirect costs associated with any unfortunate nuclear accident, costs associated with the long term storage of nuclear wastes, costs associated with nuclear mines and nuclear ore processing activities etc.
As per many credible global estimates, and as per the high level estimates available in the public domain for the proposed Jaitapur Nuclear Power plant in Maharastra, the capital cost of a nuclear power plant can be many times more than the cost of a comparable size power plant based on alternative technologies such as solar and wind power plants. 
 Since these technologies are also benign, people friendly, and environmentally sustainable, there can be no credible reason as to why these technologies should not be the preferred options to meet the legitimate electricity demand of our people. Our country also has massive potential in such renewable energytechnologies, and it is also an official policy of the govt. to aim to be a global leader in harnessing these technologies. 
It is deplorable, hence, that there has been no credible official policy document so far from our authorities, to clarify why the nuclear power plants are continued to be built in different parts of the country despite the associated massive costs and risks to the true welfare of our people.
It must also be highlighted in this context, that the total nuclear power capacity in the country is less than 2% of the total power capacity in the country, and will only become increasingly irrelevant from the operational perspective of the power sector due to the fact that massive additions are being planned in other power technology sources, such as solar and wind power plants, in the next 10-15 years.
In this larger context, my detailed representation dated, 12th September 2019 addressed to the PM (as in the PDF file attached) has detailed discussions on various associated concerns, and on the vrey relevance of nuclear power to our country. 
 A diligent consideration of all the associated concerns should be able to convince NDMA to urgenty undertake a thorough review of the credible "risk" and massive costs associated with nuclear power reactors for the country in general, and with the proposed capacity expansion plan at Kaiga APP in particular.
I am of the considered opinion that in a densely populated and resource constrained country of ours, NDMA has a much larger and critical role to honestly try to avoid large scale disasters (certainly the avoidable technology related disasters such as nuclear reactor accidents), and that NDMA should not restrict itself just to undertake post-disaster relief operations. 
 Keeping in proper perspective all these risks, costs and concerns to our people, it can be credibly stated that the best option to prevent any associated disaster scenario from a nuclear power plant is to avoid building a nuclear power plant in the first place. 
Since there are many benign and attractive technological options to meet the electricity needs of our people, NDMA should seriously consider recommending to the Union government not to build additional nuclear power reactors until all the available alternatives are fully harnessed in the country; and also to safely decommission all the operating nuclear power reactors in order to prevent the humongous costs and concerns of any unfortunate nuclear reactor disaster to our people.
May I request that due diligence in this larger context is undertaken by NDMA at an early date, and the necessary advice is made to the Union govt. accordingly?



'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Don't agree on domestic subsidies, ensure food security at WTO meet: Farmer leaders

Counterview Desk  The Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements (ICCFM), a top network of farmers’ organizations in India, in a letter to Piyush Goyal, Minister of Commerce and Industry, has asked him to “safeguard food security and sovereignty, even as ensuring peasants' rights" at the 13th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO MC 13), to take place from 26 to 29 February 2024 in Abu Dhabi.

Sharp 61-85% fall in Tech startup funding in India's top 'business-friendly' States

By Rajiv Shah Funding in Tech startups in top business-friendly Indian states has witnessed a major fall, a data intelligence platform for private market research has said in a series of reports it has released this month. Analysing Tech startup data of Telangana, Maharashtra, Delhi NCR, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala, Tracxn Technologies Ltd , the Bengaluru-based research firm, finds that except for Kerala, funding witnessed a fall of anywhere between 61% and 85%.

Maize, bajra, jute, banana cultivation banned off West Bengal border: Plea to NHRC

Counterview Desk  West Bengal-based human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Manch, and is national convenor of the Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity, in a representation to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission, second within few days, has bought to light one more case of trespassing and destruction of a fertile banana plantation by BSF personnel along the Indo-Bangladesh border, stating, despite a written complaint to the police has taken "no initiative".

India second best place to invest, next to UAE, yet there is 'lacks support' for IT services

By Sreevas Sahasranamam, Aileen Ionescu-Somers*  The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the best place in the world to start a new business, according to the latest annual Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey. The Arab nation is number one for the third year in a row thanks to a big push by the government into cutting-edge technology in its efforts to diversify away from oil.

Solar energy funding dips 9% in 2023; 2024 'kicks off' with US$1 billion investment

By Lakshmitha Raj*  Solar energy tech companies have already secured slightly over US$1 billion in funding in 2024 (till Feb 7, 2024) after total funding into Solar Energy companies in India fell 9% to US$1.55B in 2023 from US$1.7B in 2022. A total of 39 $100M+ rounds have been closed till date, with Delhi leading the city-wise funding, followed by Gurugram and Mumbai.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Mahanadi delta: Aggressive construction in flood plains, reduced fish stock, pollution

By Sudhansu R Das  Frequent natural calamities, unemployment, low farmers’ income, increase in crime rate and lack of quality human resources to strike a balance between growth and environment etc. continue to haunt the state. The state should delve into the root causes of poverty, unemployment and natural calamities.

Narmada Valley's fossil evidence: Ground for 'nationalists' to argue primates' India roots?

By Saurav Sarkar*  In December 1982, a geologist digging in India’s Central Narmada Valley found something he did not expect. Arun Sonakia, who at the time worked for the Geological Survey of India, unearthed a hominid fossil skullcap from the Pleistocene era. The discovery sent shockwaves through the field of paleoanthropology and put South Asia on the map of human prehistory. Some experts concluded that the skull likely belonged to a member of a predecessor species of ours, Homo heidelbergensis , or perhaps was a hybrid of homo species, while Sonakia himself suggested “ an affinity… to Homo erectus .”