Skip to main content

Sardar Patel's 'notable' achievement on J&K: Insertion of Article 370 in Constitution

By Shamsul Islam*
One of the "truths" manufactured in the boudhik shibirs (ideological training camps) of the RSS is that it was Jawaharlal Nehru who forced Article 370 on India while Sardar Patel, the first home minister of India, was opposed to it. The RSS leaders both inside the Modi government and outside ceaselessly keep on blaming Jawaharlal Nehru as the sole architect of Article 370, giving Kashmir special status.
After this Article was guillotined on August 5, 2019, Prime Minister Narendra Modi was eulogized as one great leader who completed Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel’s dream of 'Ek Bharat'. Ram Madhav, the current prominent ideologue of both the RSS and the BJP declared that "historic blunder committed by Nehru finally corrected."
It is also claimed that removal of the Article 370 is the realization of dream of 'martyr' like Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, who laid down his life for full integration of Kashmir with India.
Thus, RSS/BJP rulers claim that Nehru was solely responsible for inserting Article 370 in the Indian Constitution despite Sardar Patel's opposition. This is an atrocious claim even an iota of which is not corroborated by the contemporary official documents specially those documents which originated from the office of the Sardar Patel.
On the contrary, plethora of documents concerning accession of Kashmir to India proves that Sardar Patel was part of the constitutional process through which Article 370 was inserted in the Constitution. Let us revisit some of the crucial documents to know how maliciously Nehru is being presented as villain of Article 370.
Sardar Patel facilitated the adoption of Article 370 by the Constituent Assembly while Nehru was in USA
Vidya Shankar, a senior ICS (predecessor of IAS) was private secretary to Sardar (1946-50) and was the latter's most trusted advisor. He compiled and edited Sardar Patel's correspondence in two bulky volumes which are regarded as the most authentic record of Sardar's ideas and works.
Shankar, in his introductory note to the section of correspondence on Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) in Chapter 3, in fact, sings praises for Sardar for getting it passed despite hurdles. It is through Shankar that we come to know that, when Article 370 was cleared by the Constituent Assembly (CA) of India, Nehru was not in India being away to USA on official visit:
"One of Sardar's notable achievements in relation to J&K was the addition of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which defines the relation of the State to India. This matter was handled by Gopalaswami Ayyangar in consultation with Shiekh Abdullah and his Ministry and with the approval of Pandit Nehru. Although Nehru was himself away in the United States, at the time, his approval had been taken in advance to the draft formula. But Sardar had not been consulted.
“The Congress party in the Constituent Assembly was strongly, even violently, opposed to the draft article which gave a special position to the state. On principle, opinion in the party was that Kashmir should accept the Constitution on the same terms as other States; and in particular the provision that basic articles, e. g. Fundamental Rights as enshrined in the Constitution would not apply to the State was greatly resented. Gopalaswami Ayyangar failed to carry conviction and sought Sardar's intervention.
“Sardar was anxious, in the absence of Nehru, that nothing should be done which would appear as letting him down. In the absence of Nehru Sardar, therefore, undertook the task of persuading the party to change stand. He carried out the task with such success that in the Assembly there was not much discussion, and no much discussion, and no opposition to the Article (370)."
(Shankar, V (ed), "Select Correspondence of Sardar Patel" 1945-50, vol 1, Navjivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad, 1977, pp 220-21)
Thus Sardar actively participated in formulating the Article 370 and getting nod of the Constituent Assembly. He corroborated this fact in a letter to Nehru dated November 3, 1949 when he wrote:
"There was some difficulty about the provision relating to Kashmir… I could persuade the party to accept all the changes except the last one, which was modified so as to cover not merely the first Ministry so appointed but any subsequent Ministries which may be appointed under that proclamation". (Letter reproduced in Shankar, V (ed), "Select Correspondence of Sardar Patel 1945-50", vol 1, Navjivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad, 1977, p 373.)

Manufacturing history

Article 370 (originally numbered 306A) came for discussion before the CA on October 17, 1949 with President of the CA, Dr Rajendra Prasad, in the chair. Gopalaswami Ayyangar moved the resolution by reading the proposed Article with a long comment. In the course of debate only one member, Maulana Hasrat Mohani ,drew attention towards discrimination meted to the ruler of Baroda State. He stated:
"Sir, I want to make it clear at the very outset that I am neither opposed to all these concessions being granted to my Friend Sheikh Abdullah, not am I opposed to the acceptance of the Maharaja as the ruler of Kashmir. And if the Maharaja of Kashmir gets further powers and concessions I will be very glad…But may I ask a question? When you make all these concessions for Kashmir I most strongly object to your arbitrary act of compelling the Baroda State to be merged in Bombay.
“The administration of Baroda state is better than the administration of many other Indian Provinces. It is scandalous that you should compel the Maharaja of Baroda to have his raj merged in Bombay and himself pensioned off. Some people say that he himself voluntarily accepted this meager. I know it is an open secret that he was brought form England and compelled against his will..."
("Constituent Assembly Debates", vol X, Lok Sabha Secretariat, Delhi, 2003 [4th reprint], pp 421-429.)
At this point Dr Rajendra Prasad intervened, saying "Maulana, we are not concerned with the Maharaja of Baroda here", to which Maulana responded with the following words:
"Well, I would not go into any detail. But I say that I object to this sort of thing. If you grant these concessions to the Maharaja of Kashmir you should also withdraw your decision about the merger of Baroda into Baroda into Bombay and allow all these concessions and many more concessions to the Baroda ruler also." ("Constituent Assembly Debates", vol X, Lok Sabha Secretariat, Delhi, 2003 [4th reprint], pp 421-429).
Shockingly, Ram Madhav uses only three words of Maulan'as comment “Why this discrimination?" to prove in a true Goebbelsian tradition that even a Maulana had raised questions about the discriminatory nature of the Article 370! 
On the contrary, Maulana was not only supporting the Article 370 but also demanding such provisions for Baroda ruler who despite running an enlightened government was removed and his State forced to merge with Bombay.
Sardar Patel, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and other Hindu members of the Constituent Assembly agreed to Article 370 
The RSS bandwagon consciously tries to keep under wrap the actual debate on the Article 370 in the CA. It took just less than half a day for the CA to admit Article 370 in the Constitution, and apart from Dr Rajendra Prasad and Gopalaswami Ayyangar senior Hindu leaders, namely, Pandit Thakurdas Bhargava, RK Sidhwa, Pandit Hirday Nath Kunzuru, K Santhanam and Mahavir Tyagi participated in the discussion; none opposed the ratification.
It is to be noted that many of the members were known as Hindu nationalists. More importantly, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee was also a member of the CA and signed the Constitution on November 26, 1949 with Article 370 intact. He did not thinks it fit even to mildly express his unease against the special status of J&K which was done by a Hindu nationalist member, Jaspat Roy Kapoor while discussing the Draft Constitution on November, 21, 1949.
He said: 
"I only wish that Kashmir should also have been brought in on the same level as other States but, unfortunately, much to our dissatisfaction and chagrin, if I may say so, this would not be done. This is a delicate subject and I will not say anything more on it." ("Constituent Assembly Debates", vol XI, Lok Sabha Secretariat, Delhi, 2003 [4th reprint], p 762.)

Congress failure

Sadly, to the dismay of those who have faith in the democratic-secular Constitution of India, Congress which should have confronted the Hindutva Goebbels in and outside Parliament on falsifying its own history regarding the Article 370 as one witnessed dissensions. 
Some of the leading young Congress members of Parliament fell prey to the divisive game of RSS by voting with the government. A senior Congress leader, Karan Singh, son of Maharaja Hari Singh, too supported the discard of Article 370.
It is soothing that Congress as a party stood in defence of the Indian Constitution. But it should have been proactive in resisting the RSS/BJP juggernaut's narrative that it was Nehru who single-handedly forced Article 370 on the Indian Nation. Congress should have confronted Union home minister Amit Shah with contemporary documented facts.
When the CA gave green signal to Article 370 Nehru was away from the country and Sardar Patel facilitated its adoption. Those who hold Nehru responsible for it are, in fact, denigrating 299 honourable members of the CA (which included Sardar Patel and Shyama Prasad Mukherjee) as Nehru's bonded labourers.
Can the RSS/BJP produce one statement either from Sardar Patel or Mukherjee (who was minister in the first Nehru ministry from August, 15, 1947 to April 6, 1950) disowning this Article? Can the Hindutva rulers prove that both these leaders did not sign the Constitution as members of the CA since it contained Article 370?
It is a brazen denigration of the whole of the CA. Nehru becomes a punching bag because Congress, which is supposed to defend his democratic and secular heritage, is passing through a phase of inertia. It could be due to the ignorance about its glorious past. It is hoped that Congress leadership will realize that the issue is not survival of the Congress or any other party but the survival of our constitutional polity. 
Click HERE and HERE to see original documents for J&K accession to India.
---
*Veteran political scientist, Prof Islam’s writings in English, Hindi, Urdu, Marathi, Malayalam, Kannada, Bengali, Punjabi, Gujarati and video interviews/debates HERE. Twitter @shamsforjustice, blog: http://shamsforpeace.blogspot.com/. Contact: notoinjustice@gmail.com

Comments

TRENDING

Impact of state repression? Kashmir's 65% people prefer independence: Cambridge study

By Rajiv Shah 
Even as the Government of India’s controversial move to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution and bifurcate Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) into two union territories is not only refusing to down die but has acquired international dimensions, a recent study, published by the Cambridge University Press, has claimed “pro-independence attitudes” among that 65% of Kashmiris, warning, this sentiment worsens when the state machinery resorts “repressive violence”.

Dholera 'inundated': Gujarat govt tries selling low lying area as top smart city site

Counterview Desk
Even as the Dholera Special Investment Region Regional Development Authority (DSIRDA) of the Gujarat government was busy organising a junket for Gujarat-based journalists for the area sought to be sold as an ideal special investment region (SIR) for industrialists, well-known farmers' activist Sagar Rabari has wondered why no investor has so far agreed to put in money in an area situated in Ahmedabad district along the Gulf of Khambhat.

Hindus to be 'sent' to Kashmir? Despite Israeli settlements, peace eludes the region

By Anand K Sahay*
Curfew, news and communications blackout, transportation shut-down... News reports from Kashmir are worrying. So are the views relayed through the media, especially television. Old-fashioned repression seems to be consorting comfortably with expressions of concern “for our Kashmiri brethren”. We are looking at Orwell’s 1984 in the making.

Congress' anti-democratic laws led to Modi govt's 'Constitutional' changes: Scholars

Counterview Desk
A large number of academics* said to be belonging to several Indian and international institutions, even as taking strong exception to the Narendra Modi government's alleged move to amend the Constitution through "illegitimate" means, have taken strong exception to their colleagues in academia who we have become "all too accustomed to adopting a calculated silence in the face of such indignities."

Kashmir normal? Schoolboys, teenagers being arbitrarily picked up, detained: Report

Counterview Desk
A four-person team, consisting of Jean Dr├Ęze, well-known development economist; Kavita Krishnan, who is with the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist); Maimoona Mollah of the All India Democratic Women's Association (AIDWA); and Vimal Bhai of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), back from a five-day fact-finding mission (August 9-13) from Kashmir, has said that people they spoke to “expressed their pain, anger, and sense of betrayal against the Government of India.”
In a report, “Kashmir Caged”, released along with a short eight-minute film, they said, the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, dissolution of the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), and bifurcating it into two Union Territories, is not being supported by anyone they met, except for BJP spokesperson on Kashmir affairs Ashwani Kumar Chrungoo, who claimed 46% vote share in J&K.
Excerpts from the report: When our flight landed, and the airlines staff announced that passeng…

Modi's Gujarati mind? Why govt move to 'sell-off' defence PSUs isn't in national interest

By Sandeep Pandey*
The Standing Committee on Defence, 2017-18, of the 16th Lok Sabha highlights the idea of Buy Indian-IDDM (Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured). The Committee expressed concern over the import content of equipments produced and developed by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance Factories (OFs) and defence Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) because of the dependence it creates for military hardware on foreign suppliers.

Central Gujarat effluent channel 'releasing' highly polluted industrial wastewater: PM told

Counterview Desk
Senior environmentalists of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS), Vadodara, Rohit Prajapati and Krishnakant, in an open letter to the Prime Minister, the Gujarat chief minister, the Gujarat chief secretary, and senior Government of India and Gujarat government officials dealing with environment, pollution and climate change have said that the authorities’ response their pleas to take action against the leakages and flow of polluted wastewater from the effluent channels of Central Gujarat industrial areas has met with complete inertia.

Can't go to court with RTI information, rule Ahmedabad authorities: Kankaria accident

By Pankti Jog*
In a shocking reply to an application filed by me, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) authorities have said that the information provided under the Right to Information (RT) Act should be used in court or in a judicial process. The Act is known to be a major tool that enables citizens to seek certified copies of documents, records from any public authority of state and Central government within 30 days, as per provisions of the Act.

Quit India Movement 'betrayal' and dubious role of Hindu Mahasabha, RSS leaders

By Shamsul Islam*
After the recent guillotine of Article 370, Hindutva ideologue Ram Madhav, while celebrating the occasion stated that it was honouring of the sacrifices of Dr Shyam Prasad Mukherjee and thousands others who laid down their lives for its removal. It is to be noted that Dr Mukherjee was a cadre of RSS and was groomed into a Hindutva leader by another Hindutva icon, VD Savarkar.

Strategy for united struggle against Hindutva 'fascism': Ideological silence is 'no option'

By Dr Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
Electoral alliance and opportunism of national and regional political parties, neoliberal economic marginalisation and soft secular Hindutva line pandering to Hindu majoritarianism laid the foundation of Hindutva fascism in post-colonial India.