Skip to main content

RTI Act holy cow for Govt of India? Official insists, don't ask why, when, what, where

By Pankti Jog*
The Government of India appears to have begun treating the Right to Information (RTI) Act as a holy cow. Its officials seem to believe that the Act is a sacred law, under which people shouldn't be questioning its functioning. One recalls what Prime Minister Narendra Modi said while addressing an RTI convention in 2015: “Why should government wait for people to ask information, we will have all information out in the domain, we have nothing to hide."
Modi's speech was appreciated as one with vision of “proactive governance”. And yet, nearly five years down the line, we find his government failing to practice what he said, with the RTI Act slowly turning into a law of secrecy, a sacred law which does not allow people to question its decision-making process.
In reply to an RTI application filed with a government TV channel, its Central public information officer (CPIO), appointed for providing RTI replies, outrightly denied information saying the RTI Act is "sacred" and shouldn't be used to question government actions.
The applicant had asked for a copy of the contract signed with an expert engaged by the government TV channel, which is a public authority, and also details of service conditions, rules and remuneration paid to this expert as per the contract. Denying the plea for information, CPIO also insisted that the Act can only be used for a "bona fide" purpose and queries like "why, when, where and what" shouldn't be made.
This is a matter of deep concern. For, one of the circulars dated June 1, 2009 states that RTI cannot give justification to particular a thing, or a document, but can provide the copy of a document. This came to light in the judgement given by the Goa Bench of the Mumbai High Court in the Dr Celsa Pinto vs Goa Information Commission case. The judgement said that RTI can provide copies of documents, but need not answer the question “why”.
“All document related to any decision, noting, can definitely have answers to these questions, PIO can provide relevant documents, even if citizen asks certain question”, says the government resolution (GR), but nowhere does it say questions are banned. Despite this, the CPIO of the TV channel, while refusing to give information, mentions some judgement without quoting the source. This is a clear case of misuse of GR as also different orders by the Central Information Commission (CIC).
This detail has been shared on Twitter, too. It reveals the truth as to how RTI, which is a law of transparency, is misinterpreted as "law of secrecy", and is being called “sacred law”. We at the Gujarat RTI Helpline No 9924085000 have received more than 67 calls over the last one month, citing PIOs of different public authorities denying information when there is a “question mark” in the RTI application.
Actually Section 6 of the RTI Act clearly states that the RTI applicant should be assisted by PIO whenever needed in framing queries. If one wants to see copy of the list of people who got support for building toilets, and if she/he can't frame a query, one may ask, “How many toilets were built?” PIO is supposed to give copy of the list of toilets built with government support.
Statistics from different commissions show that every year around 60 lakh citizens apply under RTI to different public authorities. Over the last few years, the number of RTI applications have decreased. A major reason is, the government does not like people to question its functioning, decision making, budgeting, expenses etc. The vision of proactive governance and transparency appears to have vanished in the air.
In fact, as things stand today, the government seems to have turned itself into a “holy cow”, which cannot be questioned anytime.
---
*With Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel, Ahmedabad

Comments

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

A 'distorted narrative' of Indian politics: Congress failing to look beyond LS polls

By Prem Singh*  About 15 days ago, I told a senior journalist friend that there are not even two   months left for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi is roaming around on a delectation (tafreeh). The friend probably found my comment exasperating and replied that he is not on a delectation trip. The conversation between us on this topic ended there. 

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.