Skip to main content

Deepening industrial crisis, Gandhian model of economy and post-globalisation scenario

Child climate change activist Greta Thunberg, her mother opera singer Malena Ernman
By Sandeep Pandey*
On August 20, 2019 the "Indian Express" e-paper carried  an unusual advertisement by the Northern India Textiles Mills Association about Indian spinning industry facing a huge crisis. The spinning mills are incurring huge loses, they are not in a position to buy Indian cotton, livelihood of 10 crore people, directly or indirectly, dependent on textile industry and a larger number of farmers who produce cotton are in jeopardy.
Another advertisement which appeared earlier on August 1 in the "Economic Times" on behalf of the Indian Tea Association, talks about tea industry in crisis. Because of increasing losses to Tea Gardens livelihood of over 10 lakhs workers is threatened. On August 21 "Outlook" reports that Parle Products Private Limited, the largest biscuit manufacturer in the country, may slash the jobs of 10,000  employees if the government doesn't reduce Goods and Services Tax.
On the other hand the government is on a hundred day spree, after the second time Narendra Modi has become Prime Minister with a thumping majority, named big-bang economic reforms as part of which public assets belonging to Public Sectors Units or even government departments like Ordnance Factories are either up for sale or corporatisation.
The government has a target to mop up Rs 90,000 crore through this process under the euphemism of 'asset monetisation'. Last year it exceeded its target of Rs 80,000 crore, a proof of how aggressively it is selling public assets to private or other government companies, to meet its fiscal deficit.
Are these healthy signs for a country's economy? A crisis is looming large with the government pretending that everything is hunky-dory. The PM has a vision of making India a $5 trillion economy by 2025. In his last term as PM his high profile skill development programme meant for generating employment ended up with offering 10% reservation in jobs to economically weaker sections among the general category of population just before the elections.
Advertisement in "Indian Express"
Mahatma Gandhi had a completely different view of economy. He clarified that he was not opposed to machinery per se but the craze of machinery as labour saving contraptions. The culmination of labour saving process is in thousands becoming unemployed. Gandhi said he wanted to save time and labour not for a fraction of mankind but for all.
He wanted concentration of wealth not in hands of few but in the hands of all. He believed that the real reason behind the labour saving argument is greed for more profit. Mahatma Gandhi kept human beings at the centre of his economic thinking. He believed that machines should not tend to atrophy the limbs of human beings.
According to his own admission he did make intelligent exceptions. For example, he thought that sewing machine was a useful device. Similarly, he was for a machine which could straighten crooked spindles, even though spindles themselves would be made by the blacksmiths in his scheme of things.
When questioned as to where would he draw the line, he said where they would cease to help the individual and encroach upon the individuality. He didn't believe that rapidity of motor cars was needed as it was not the primary wants of human beings.
Mahatma Gandhi compared machine to the human body which served its purpose only to the extent till it was helpful towards the growth of soul. He believed that machines, like human body, were inevitable. But human body, according to him, a fantastic piece of mechanism is nevertheless a hindrance to liberation of the soul.
Gandhi thought that machinery had impoverished India and was symbolic of sin because the workers had become slaves and mill owners had become rich immorally at the expense of workers. He had the conviction that poor could fight British but the rich would always support them.
A tea garden in Darjeeling
When asked whether the mills should be closed down, he said that would be a difficult decision but they should definitely not expand. It is interesting to note that in the abovementioned present crisis faced by tea industry the Indian Tea Association has urged the government to ban expansion of tea areas to contain oversupply for 5 years.
In the context of the question about what we should do with all the industrial products around us, Mahatma Gandhi advised to follow the policy of swadeshi and use of articles that were used before modern products arrived in the market.
He admits that it may not be possible for all human beings to give up all machine made things at once but they could find out what they could give up and gradually cease to use it. He also advocated that we should not wait for others to give up and should take the initiative.
A good recent example is that of Greta Thunberg, the child climate change activist from Sweden who spearheads an ongoing movement called Flight Shame and Train Bragging where she, her mother opera singer Malena Ernman and number of other European citizens have stopped flying and started travelling by trains as there is less carbon emission in latter compared to the former.
There is a significant spike in rail travel and drop in air travel in Sweden because of this movement. Similarly, a Lucknow based health activist Bobby Ramakant has given up ownership and driving of car, preferring to walk, cycle and use of public transport.
Bengaluru-based activist Gurumoorthy Mathrubootham has given up domestic flying and uses trains instead. We could find examples like these individuals around us who have taken an initiative to reduce their dependence on machines.
In crisis... Parle-G
In It appears that the ultimate challenge to the modern paradigm of development based on industrialisation will come from the climate change crisis.
But the most astonishing validation of Gandhian thinking was when the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) was introduced in this country in 2006, which was later renamed as MGNREGA prefixing Mahatma Gandhi's name to it, which banned machines and contractors, both anathema to Gandhi, in the interest of workers.
The basic argument of this scheme, conceptualised by famous Belgian origin Indian economist Jean Dreze, was that if providing employment to masses was the objective then machines would have to be kept out of the work to be offered under MGNREGA.
---
*Magsaysay award winning social activist and academic. Contact: ashaashram@yahoo.com

Comments

TRENDING

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Church in India 'seems to have lost' moral compass of unequivocal support to the poor

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
In 2017, Pope Francis dedicated a special day, to be observed by the Universal Church, every year, as the ‘World Day of the Poor’. This year it will be observed on November 17 on the theme ‘The hope of the poor shall not perish for ever’; in a message for the day Pope Francis says:

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”