Skip to main content

JICA hands over crucial bullet train report to Gujarat farmers, denied by Govt of India

JICA India office chief meeting farmers' representatives in Ahmedabad 
By Rajiv Shah
Chief representative of Japan International Co-operation Agency’s (JICA) India office Katsuo Matsumoto, who visited the office of senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik in Ahmedabad on August 30, has handed over a crucial report it had prepared on its December 8-9, 2018 meeting with Gujarat and Maharashtra farmers, affected by the high-profile Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project, as also senior activists.
JICA, a Japanese government agency, is funding the proposed bullet train, considered a prestige project of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. It handed over the report to the Government of India’s special purpose vehicle, National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd (NHSRCL), set up to implement the project. However, NHSRCL refused to make it public, saying it was a JICA “property” despite farmers’ repeated pleas.
The report, among other things, gives a detailed representation by Gujarat and Maharashtra farmers’ representatives, even as visiting sites in villages Amodpore in Navasari district, Ghildoi in Vaslad district and Kathor in Surat district, where about 500 farmers would be affected.
The common complaints of the farmers, according to the report, was that their lands were being “divided in two-three parts due to acquisition”, as a result of which the value of land of balance parcels “would go down”, creating “difficulties in irrigation and access for the farmer.”
Further, the report says, quoting farmers, that the “difference between jantri rate/circle rate (government rate of land for a particular area) and the market rate is 10 times”, and “compensation as per jantri rate at some spots is is Rs 22 lakh as against the market rate of Rs 2 crore.
As for Maharashtra, the report says, gram sabhas representatives of Palghat told that JICA team they had “denied permission and passed resolution stating that they are not in support of land acquisition and the project”, because it would “not benefit the people of the area, leading to land alienation, affects livelihood etc.”
The report also says, farmers apprehended they would not be able to utilize 30 metres plus row on both sides of the rail alignment, and though it would be utilized for future private development, “no compensation is offered for this portion.” Further, land is currently used for multiple crops and tree plantations, which yield after many years, yet “no compensation is offered” for this.
Then, the farmers complained that there would be “displacement of tribal agricultural workers”, as “no compensation” is being paid them, adding, before starting the land acquisition process, they were given just a couple of days for consultation instead of the “requirement of one month prior notice.” Further, notices and information shared in English, a language farmers could not comprehend.
Before handing over the report, JICA officials held a meeting, lasting for two hours, with Yagnik, Jayesh Patel, president, Gujarat Khedut Samaj (GKS), and two affected farmers, where the top JICA official is learnt to have accepted three fundamental  proposal of farmers:
  1. That by JICA's own guidelines and un-amended 2013 legislation, affected farmers and non-farmers must get compensation not at the rate of 2011 jantri but at the market rate of 2018-19 that must be revised.
  2. That social impact assessment under Indian laws must be undertaken so as to understand the impact of bullet train project, something the Gujarat government and the Government of India refused to do. 
  3. And that R&R of project affected people (PAPs) must take place as per JICA guidelines and the un-amended land acquisition Act, 2013 and provisions with regard to R&R entitlements should be adhered to
A note forwarded by Yagnik on the meeting said, JICA officials agreed that social impact assessment (SIA) under Indian laws must be undertaken so as to “understand the impact of bullet train project”, and a rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) of project affected people (PAPs) must be take place as per JICA guidelines and the un-amended land acquisition Act, 2013.
The JICA official was told that South Gujarat farmers affected by the project had “preferred” etitions before the Gujarat High Court challenging the land acquisition process initiated for the bullet train project.
JICA accepted a fundamental farmers' demand – that they be compensated in accordance with the “un-amended" land acquisition Act, 2013, based on 2018-19 market rate 
At the same time, the note said, “incidental and ancillary issues” were raised before the JICA official “concerning the dilution of beneficial provisions of the Central land acquisition law by the state to the disadvantage of the farmers/landowners in order to implement the vanity project of bullet train.”
The note said, a thousand farmers had filed affidavits before the Gujarat High Court opposing the project, which is currently “pending delivery of judgment” and is “sub judice”, regretting, despite this, land acquisition for the project is being carried by by the government and NHSRCL “continued unabated” so as to “frustrate the rights of the affected landowners and farmers.”
As no corrective steps were taken by NHSRCL, the note said, Yagnik wrote to JICA in August 2019 on behalf of farmers seeking a copy of the report submitted to NHSRCL and steps taken by NHSRCL on it.
The note said, Yagnik and the farmers’ representatives told the JICA official that farmers’ grievances revolved around failure to do proper SIA, lack of provision for R&R entitlements and determination of compensation as per the present market value, guaranteed under the Central land acquisition Act, 2013, all of which was being sought to be scuttled by the state government.
The meeting ended with the JICA official submitted a copy of the report it had prepared and submitted to N, the note said, adding, the official “assured” that farmers’ fundamental grievances should be redressed before implementing the bullet train project.
---
Click HERE for JICA report submitted to NHSRCL 

Comments

Uma said…
Say what you want, Modi is not going to give up on this project
Anonymous said…
I want Market rate value
Otherwise we will not give this land
JAY said…
We want Market value otherwise we will not give our land

TRENDING

Did Modi promote Dholavira, a UNESCO site now, as Gujarat CM? Facts don't tally

By Rajiv Shah  As would generally happen, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet – that not only was he “absolutely delighted” with the news of UNESCO tag to Dholavira, but he “ first visited ” the site during his “student days and was mesmerised by the place” – is being doubted by his detractors. None of the two tweets, strangely, even recalls once that it’s a Harappan site in Gujarat.

How real is Mamata challenge to Modi? Preparing for 2024 'khela hobey' moment

By Prof Ujjwal K Chowdhury*  Third time elected West Bengal Chief Minister, Mamata Banerjee is on a whirlwind tour of Delhi, meeting everyone who matters within and beyond the government, the Prime Minister, the President, some Cabinet ministers, Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, several other opposition leaders, et al.

Labelling a Jesuit a Marxist? It's like saying if you use a plane, you become American

Jesuits: Cedric Prakash, Stan Swamy By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* A thirteen- fourteen-year-old has many dreams! That's an impressionable age; at the cusp of finishing school. It is also a time when one tastes a different kind of freedom: to go for camps with boys of your own age (not with ones family). Such camps and outings were always enjoyed to the hilt. The ones, however, which still remain etched in my memory are the mission camps to the Jesuit missions in Maharashtra and Gujarat.

Giant conglomerates 'favoured': Whither tribal rights for jal-jungle-jameen?

Prafull Samantara By Mohammad Irshad Ansari*  The struggle for “Jal, Jungle and Jameen” has been a long-drawn battle for the tribal communities of India. This tussle was once again in the limelight with the proposed diamond mining in the Buxwaha forest of Chhatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). The only difference in this movement was the massive social media support it gained, which actually seems to tilt the scale for the tribal people in a long time.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

If not Modi, then who? Why? I (an ordinary citizen) am there! Main hoon naa!

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The number of women ministers is doubled in early July from the first term after cabinet reshuffle by the present government led by Narendra Modi. While there were 06 women ministers in the previous term, this term there are 11. The previous two governments led by Dr Manmohan Singh had 10 women ministers in each tenure. Are these number of women ministers something to rejoice in the near 75 years of independence? Yes maybe, if we think that things are slowly improving in the patriarchal system. This change is less likely to achieve gender balance in the parliament otherwise we require more than 11 as per the 33% reservation . This change is also less likely because the men politicians’ inability to handle the country’s mess is becoming more and more evident and especially during the corona crisis. Seems, the addition of more women ministers may be a result of the recent assembly elections where women played a decisive role in the election results. For example

UP arrest of 'terrorists': Diverting attention from Covid goof-up, Ram temple land scam?

By Advocate Mohammad Shoaib, Sandeep Pandey* That corruption is rampant in police department is a common experience. However, there is another form of corruption which devastates lives of individuals and their families. It has now emerged as a common phenomenon that police more often than not register false cases because of which individuals have to spend number of years in jail.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Effluent discharge into deep sea? Modi told to 'reconsider' Rs 2275 crore Gujarat project

Counterview Desk  In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, well-known Gujarat-based environmentalist, Mahesh Pandya of the Paryavaran Mitra, has protested against the manner in with the Gujarat government is continuing with its deep sea effluent disposal project despite environmental concerns.

Gujarat govt gender insensitive? Cyclone package for fisherfolk 'ignores' poor women

By Our Representative A memorandum submitted to the Gujarat government by various fisherfolk associations of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat under the leadership of Ahmedabad NGO Centre for Social Justice's senior activist Arvind Khuman, who is based in Amreli, has suggested that the relief package offered to the fishermen affected by the Tauktae cyclone is not only inadequate, it is also gender insensitive.