Skip to main content

Will Govt of India ministers be allowed to stand by assurances on tribal rights given to them, wonder senior activists

Piyush Goyal receiving memorandum from mm&P delegates
By A Representative
Will the Modi government  oblige Union tribal affairs minister Jual Oram, who assured a civil rights group of "protect" tribal rights in mining areas by forming an all-party tribal MPs' committee to look into why India-wide implementation of the Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA, 1996)?
PESA gives full powers to gram sabhas to people living in scheduled areas, mainly tribals, full rights to decide on how to utilize natural resources.
The delegation, led by Ravi Rebbapragada, chairman, mines, minerals & People (mm&P), which also met Piyush Goyal, minister of power, coal, new and renewable energy and mines, was told the Government of India “would look into” and “discuss” issues concerning environmental pollution.
A senior activist, who was part of the delegation, wondered whether the ministers'  assurance would turn into firm action, of if powerful pro-industry forces in the wouldn't allow smooth implementation of tribal rights laws, including PESA.
Expressing concern over “poor governance” and “apathy” of state governments in implementing the provisions of PESA and the Samata judgment, which seeks Centre’s intervention for implementing PESA, 1996, the delegation requested the ministers to “look into the matter” and demanded “appropriate action against the blatant violation of the provisions under the Act.” It particularly sought the Centre’s proactive interest in implementing the Act.
Representatives from 17 states met the two ministers and members of Parliament as part of their effort to apprise the ministers and MPs about the condition of children in mining areas, illegal mining and legal compliance and liability, failure to utilize the District Mineral Fund (DMF), and need to set up a Future Generations Fund in the mining areas.
Apart from the two ministers, the delegation met members of Parliament Sharad Yadav of Janta Dal (U), Mansukh Vasava of BJP, D Rajaof CPI, Tiruchi Siva of DMK, Jairam Ramesh of Congress, Jitendra Choudhury of CPI (M), among others.
Memoranaudm being submitted to  Jual Oram
Ashok Shrimali, general secretary, mm&P, told the ministers, “Despite several strict legislations and rules to regulate mines and minerals, 90% of mining activities are across the country are illegal. Owing to the loot of our natural resources in the absence of regulation, country’s huge chunk of royalty is being thieved by the mining mafia.”
Raising the issue of DMF, which is intended to be used for the rehabilitation and development of the communities affected by mining, Rebbapragada said, “Though the rules for DMF have been framed and funds accrued in most of the states, the utilization of this fund has not been in line with the mandated objectives”. He added, “There have been heinous attempts to hijack the funds and divert them to help the mining mafia.”
Rahul Basu of Goa Foundation demanded that there should an “intergenerational equity” in the mining areas, so that the people are made owners of the natural resources for generations to come, adding, this could be done by extending the “landmark judgment on creation of Goa iron ore permanent fund, delivered by the Supreme Court in case of Goa Foundation vs State of Goa, across the country.”
Shiva Kumar, anti-mining activist from Ballary, Karnataka, said, there has been criminal delay in preparing action plan and utilizing unused fund accrued under the Karnataka Mining Environment Restoration Corporation.
“Although it has been more than five years of Supreme Court order in the case of Samaj Parivartan Samuday v/s State of Karnataka to undertake environment restoration work in mine ravaged districts of Ballari, Chitradurga and Tumakuru, not a single penny is spent on the community directly affected by mining”, he said.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

RTI at 21: Study flags data gaps, rising backlogs, appeal pendency across Union government

  By Jag Jivan   As the Right to Information (RTI) Act completed 21 years since its enactment on June 21, 2005, a detailed analysis of the Central Information Commission's (CIC) Annual Report for 2024-25 has raised questions about reporting accuracy, transparency practices and the overall implementation of the law across Union government institutions.