Skip to main content

Modi "removed" name of author Mahadev Desai, "changed" title of Bhagwad Gita presented to Obama

By A Representative
Just one day ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's second meeting with President Barack Obama in US, Mahatma Gandhi's secretary Mahadevbhai Desai's grandson has made a serious allegation against Modi – that the Bhagwad Gita's version Modi presented to Obama during his previous visit was actually authored by his grandfather. Yet, Modi not only changed the title, he even removed Mahadev Desai's name.
Mahadev Desai's grandson Nachiketa Desai is one of the senior-most journalists of Gujarat who is currently working as consulting editor (political) with the United News of India, and has been associated with Swaraj Abhiyan, the breakaway group of Aam Aadmi Party.
He has said in a Facebook post, “During his visit to the US as Prime Minister, the Bhagwad Gita which Modi presented to Obama was actually written by my grandfather Mahadev Desai.” He added, the "truth" is that Modi presented Obama "with a doctored version of my grandfather's book."
He goes on to say, “Its cover was changed, so was its name, in order to come up with a 'new' book. The original title of the book was 'The Gospel of Selfless Action or The Gita According to Gandhi', and the one that was presented to Obama was 'Bhagwat Gita According to Gandhi'. Even the name of the author has disappeared.”
Nachiketa Desai comments, “This is like pasting 'College' on 'Colgate'.” Calling him “Feku” (pretender) without naming him, the journalist says, the Prime Minister is “not just guilty of befooling the people of India by selling fake promises, he also befooling US president Obama.”
The photographs released by the journalist show that Mahadev Desai's book was published by the Navjivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad, founded by Mahatma Gandhi. The author's name is there on the book. However, the Bhagwad Gita presented by Modi to Obama calls it “special edition”, with the following wordings, “Presented by Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi.” There is no name of Mahadev Desai on the cover.
Modi presented Bhagwad Gita to Obama on September 30, 2014 during the dinner hosted at the White House. On gifting the sacred book, Modi had said, India's guiding philosophy was inspired by Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi as far as India is concerned. “We believe in non-violence,” he had added.
Nachiketa Desai's exposure comes just a week after the Government of India refused to part with any details about Bhagwad Gita presented to Obama under the right to information (RTI) plea by RTI activist from Ahmedabad, Roshan Shah. In reply to Shah, the Ministry of External Affairs says, “No information is available.”
It added, the ministry is not supposed to give information on the basis of queries which are actually inferences and assumptions or which seek to interpret them, hence the application is “disposed of.” Shah had sought information on who was the author of the “Bhagvad Gita book presented to Barack Obama by Narendra Modi?, Who was the publisher of this Bhagvad Gita book?”, and “did Narendra Modi add any forward inside the book?”
The applicant further asked the ministry, “Was the book title changed from its original title? Was the author or publishers permission taken by PMO before changing the title? Please provide copy of the bill used for purchase of the book. From which store/organization was the book purchased? Who recommended to present the book to Obama?”
The applicant went on to add, “Who all approved to present the book to Obama? Who all read the book in PMO before it was offered as gift to Obama to ensure that there was no vulgar language in it? Did the book underwent security checks before it was presented to Obama and at which locations?”, and finally, “What is the ISBN of the book?”

Comments

  1. http://www.printweek.in/News/390860,avantika-printed-bhagwad-gita-presented-to-president-obama.aspx

    Hope this answers a few of your queries

    ReplyDelete

  2. Why are you being so anonymous, Mr or Ms Anonymous on this comment? :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So says the one who identifies his/herself as the Unknown. :-)
      Samir Lukka

      Delete
  3. I'm not surprised;
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325502/Map-shows-worlds-racist-countries-answers-surprise-you.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...