Skip to main content

Modi "encouraged" Gujarat, Odisha to promulgate own bills to undermine "progressive" 2013 land law

By Our Representative
National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), the apex body of tens of mass organizations, has wondered if the Narendra Modi government has “encouraged” Gujarat to bypass the "progressive" Land Acquisition Act, 2013, by coming up with its own legislation, Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceilings Bill, in order to allow corporates to buy up farmers’ land without any hindrance.
Even as welcoming Modi for deciding not to re-promulgate the ordinance which had sought to undermine the “progressive” and “pro-farmer” provisions of the LAA, 2013, the NAPM, noting the new disturbing trend, says, “It remains to be seen if there is proper implementation of LAA 2013 at the state-level.”
Led by well-known social activist Medha Patkar, NAPM has said, already, two states have been “encouraged” to bypass the Central LAA and frame their own legislations, Gujarat and Odisha. In a statement, it has demanded, “The Government of India needs to ensure that the LAA 2013 is uniformly applied to states and the rights of the people are protected.”
Calling Modi’s announcement not to re-promulgate the controversial ordinance as “symbolizing victory of people’s movements”, NAPM said, “Since the time government promulgated land ordinance in the last week of December 2014, farmers and peasants, forests dwellers, adivasis and numerous others have showed their steadfast opposition to the ordinance and demanded that it should be repealed without conditions.”
NAPM recalls, in its submission to the Joint Parliamentary Committee, it “not only demanded the withdrawal of the ordinance, but also asked for addition of many other provisions to the 2013 Act.” The provisions to be added, it suggested, should be such that they “protect land rights and also address the woes and sufferings of the millions who have been displaced in the country in name of development and national interest, post-Independence.”
NAPM further says, “On the face of it, Bihar elections are being said to be the reason for this political decision.” Disagreeing with such an interpretation, it added, “However, it is the massive opposition to the corporate designs of the Modi government by the people of this country, which has forced the government to reverse its decision.”
Praising the role played by Congress, Left and other parties in ensuring that LAA remains intact, NAPM says, “Political parties in opposition have played a crucial role inside Parliament but ultimately it is the strength of the people’s movements and farmers organizations on the ground which has forced the government to take back the ordinance.”
“Now that it is clearly proved that this government will go to any lengths in order to please its corporate masters, it remains the primary onus of people's movements to ensure a constant vigilance on attempts of endangering the rights and livelihoods of millions of India's agricultural workers and farmers”, the statement says.
NAPM points out, “Even as we wait for the government to come up with the notification on application of 2013 Act to 13 Central Acts, we also look forward to the report of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), which debated and discussed the submissions made by different stakeholders, majority of which rejected the proposals of the government.”
Meanwhile, the Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceilings Bill, passed in the state assembly recently, has come under sharp criticism for favouring chosen businessmen by helping them acquire “precious agricultural land, usurping the rights of tribals, members of other backward class (OBC) communities, Dalits and cattle holders”.
In a statement, national spokespersons and Congress Shaktisinh Gohil said, “To make its plan smooth, Congress members were suspended from the House and the amendment bill was passed unanimously.” He added, “The government has taken advantage of the recent Supreme Court judgment which declared that grassland should be treated as agricultural land.”
Gohil, who is a Gujarat High Court advocate, too, said, “The land available under the Supreme Court verdict can change lives of lakhs of poor people of tribal, members of OBC communities, Dalits and cattle holders. But the government is interested in its favourite businessmen and industrialists, and so it changed the Act. Now this land can be given to industrialists.”

Comments

TRENDING

India under Modi among top 10 autocratizing nations, on verge of 'losing' democracy status

By Rajiv Shah
A new report, prepared by a top Swedish institute studying liberal democracy, has observed that there has been a sharp “dive in press freedom along with increasing repression of civil society in India associated with the current Hindu-nationalist regime of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.” The report places India among the top 10 countries that “have autocratized the most”. Other countries that have been identified for rolling towards autocracy are -- Hungary, Turkey, Poland, Serbia, Brazil, Mali, Thailand, Nicaragua and Zambia.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Border conflict? RBI nod India's 'brotherly' help to China internationalise its currency

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
In the middle of a global pandemic, China started an unprovoked border conflict with India. It unraveled trust deficit and ties between the two neighbours. As thousands of Chinese troops tried occupying Indian territory, the Narendra Modi-led BJP government directs the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to allow the Bank of China to start regular banking services in India. The Bank of China will now operate in India like any other commercial banks.

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

By Shamsul Islam*
National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

Clean chit to British rulers, Muslim League? Karnataka to have Veer Savarkar flyovers

By Shamsul Islam*
The BJP government of Karnataka led by BS Yediyurappa is going to honour Hindutva icon VD Savarkar by naming two of the newly built major flyovers in Bangalore and Mangalore after him. There was a huge uproar against this decision of the RSS-BJP government as many pro-Kannada organisations with opposition parties and liberal-secular organizations questioned the logic to ignore so many freedom fighters, social reformers and others from within the state.

Hurried nod to Western Ghat projects: 16 lakh Goans' water security 'jeopardised'

Counterview Desk
Taking strong exception to "virtual clearances" to eco-sensitive projects in the Western Ghats, the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) in a statement has said urged for a review of the four-lane highway, 400 KV transmission line and double tracking of the railway line through the Bhagwan Mahavir Wildlife Sanctuary and Mollem National Park in Goa.

Letter to friends, mentors: Coming together of class, communal, corona viruses 'scary'

By Prof (Dr) Mansee Bal Bhargava*
COVID greetings from Ahmedabad to dear mentors and friends from around the world…
I hope you are keeping well and taking care of yourself besides caring for the people around you. I’m writing to learn how is the science and the society coping with the prevention and cure of the pandemic. I’m also writing to share the state of the corona virus that is further complicated with the long-standing class and communal viruses.

Disturbing signal? Reliance 'shifting focus' away from Indian petrochemical sector

By NS Venkataraman*
Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), a large Indian company, has expanded and grown in a spectacular manner during the last few decades, like of which no industrial group in India has performed before. RIL is now involved in multi various activities relating to petroleum refineries, petrochemicals, oil and gas exploration, coal bed methane, life sciences, retail business, communication network, (Jio platform) media/entertainment etc.

Case for nationalising India's healthcare system amidst 'strong' private control

Counterview Desk
A draft discussion note, prepared by Dr Maya Valecha, a Gujarat-based gynecologist and activist, sent to the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) as also a large number of activists, academics and professionals as an email alert, is all set to create a flutter among policy experts for its strong insistence on nationalizing India’s healthcare system.