Skip to main content

Adanis' Australian coalmining project: Another top bank withdraws, indiginous people "rejoice"

By Our Representative
Following the announcement by the Commonwealth Bank to withdraw from financing the powerful Indian Adani Group’s controversial Australian coalmining project, the National Australia Bank (NAB) has declared it too is “withdrawing.” The National Australia Bank has announced that it will “not fund Adani’s Australian Carmichael coal mine project”, a highly placed source in Australia said.
Welcoming the NAB’s decision, the lead spokesperson of the Wangan and Jagalingou (W&J) Traditional Owners Family Council, representing traditional owners Galilee Basin, where the project is proposed, has said, the NAB has ruled out “any involvement, now or in the future, in financing this disastrous project”.
“Today, NAB has acted with moral authority and in accordance with the principles of corporate social responsibility to which it is signatory. Its decision brings this disastrous project one step closer to its demise”, W&J spokesperson Adrian Burragubba said. “Our Council is deeply heartened.”
“NAB’s announcement comes one day after the W&J leaders met with senior officials and the Indigenous programme leader from the bank. “It was clear in our meeting that this corporate giant has a meaningful grasp of the fact that the W&J Council opposes Carmichael, and that, crucially, the project does not have the free, prior and informed consent of our people”, the spokesperson said.
“The bank had clearly done its due diligence. It understood that we have rejected a land use agreement with Adani for the mine, and that no means no”, the spokesperson said, adding, “The meeting reinforced for our people that our moral claim to exercise our rights in relation to our traditional lands is recognised by responsible businesses”.
So far, as many as 10 international banks, including Adani’s former chief financier for Carmichael, Standard Chartered, have withdrawn from the project.
Meanwhile, the W&J Council has decided to call on the remaining two of Australia’s big four banks – Westpac and ANZ – which have not ruled out funding, “to confirm without delay they will not support the Carmichael coal mine with finance”, the spokesman said.
“Only two of Australia’s big 4 banks now remain on the wrong side of history. We are convinced that when they examine the Carmichael project and see its lack of economic viability, its destruction of the environment, and the cost to our rights, culture and our sacred ancestral lands and waters, they can only reach the same conclusion as their peers – to definitely walk away from the project”, the spokesperson claimed.
The Federal Court of Australia last month set aside approval of the mine by Federal Environment Minister Greg Hunt, who will now need to review his decision on the mine. “We look forward to our day in Federal Court this month, as we bring our own challenge against Carmichael”, the spokesperson said.
We confirm, again, that we will do everything in our power to stop this mine ripping the heart out of our country, including, if necessary taking our case to the highest court in the land”, said Burragubba.
Yet, the spokesperson regrets, “It is bizarre and troubling that the Queensland province and Federal governments persist in their support for the Adani Carmichael project. They should heed the message of the NAB, the Commonwealth Bank, and a roll call of international banks and investors and recognise that Adani’s mine is at a dead end in history.”
“The future does not lie in the destruction of Aboriginal culture, the devastation of the environment, and the fueling of dangerous climate change”, he said. “It is time for Australian Governments to chart a sensible course on energy and development, cancel this project, to leave our lands and waters alone”.

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

A locked up offer? Govt of India 'not serious' in involving NGOs: IIM-A survey

By Rajiv Shah
Was the Government of India serious when it asked 92,000 civil society organizations (CSOs) in early April to “assist” state governments and district administrations in taking care of food, shelter and other needs of migrant workers, known to have been affected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’ sudden 21-day lockdown in order to “combat” the spread of Covid-19 virus, announced on March 24?

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Dalits in India, Blacks in US suffer 'similar' humiliation: Macwan drafts letter to Trump

Counterview Desk
Well-known human rights activist Martin Macwan, recipient of the prestigious Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Award in 2000, has drafted an open letter to US President Donald Trump following the disturbing turn of events with the murder of George Floyd, leading to widespread protests in the US. He has sought signatures of concerned citizens before sending it to Trump.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”

Sitharaman's offer for rural jobs to 'create' just 3 crore rural jobs. Demand: 12 crore jobs

By Amarjeet Kaur*
The final package, the fifth one in a row, announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on May 17 was a fiasco. Sitharaman during her press conference for two hours and six minutes spent more than an hour detailing the policy actions of her government’s last six years’ rule, repeating the already provided proposals during the two budgets after coming to power for the second time, even as reiterating her briefings on the four earlier packages she had announced over the previous four days.