Skip to main content

No tribal representation in order forming committees for eco-sensitive zone in South Gujarat, 30,000 protest

Second South Gujarat rally against Central order "ignoring" tribals
By Our Representative
In a major development, the Government of India’s proposed notification, calling for declaring the seven kiloemtre area around South Gujarat’s one of the most well-preserved Shoolpaneshwar sanctuary as eco-sensitive has zone, has ignored participation of local tribal representatives in the proposed master plan to “develop” the region.
The sanctuary is situated off the controversial Narmada dam, and houses some 121 tribal villages.
While the notification wants the master plan to be implemented for developing eco-tourism activities and “non-polluting” small scale industries the eco-sensitive zone, it is widely believed, the sanctuary is the next target for extension of tourism activities off Narmada dam around the 182-metre tall statue of the Sardar Patel under construction in the midst of Narmada river.
The notification says, the master plan would be declared after ”consultation with all the concerned departments”, such as environment, forests, urban development, tourism, municipality, revenue, agriculture, Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB), irrigation and public works department of the Gujarat government.
Published in Hindi and English – with no Gujarati copy made available – the notification, dated July 30, given to the tribal villages last week, also talks of having a seven-person monitoring committee for ensuring proper implementation of the master plan. However, here also, it ignores any representative from the tribal dominated area’s 121 tribal villages, which it seeks to identify as part of eco-sensitive zone.
The seven-person monitoring committee would be largely official, or with two “independent” members chosen by the government. There is, however, no mention of giving representation to elected members from the tribal region, let alone representatives of the villages which would form part of the eco-sensitive zone.
Veteran tribal leader Chhotubhai Vasava with others on the rostrum
The committee would iclude the district collector, Narmada; a senior town planner of the area; the regional officer of the GPCB; a representative of the department of forests and environment, Gujarat government; and the deputy conservator of forests, in charge of Shoolpaneshwar Sanctuary, Narmada district.
Then there would be two “independent” members – a non-government organization representative, who would be chosen by the government; and an expert in the area ecology and environment, again chosen by the Gujarat government – and both would be chosen for a period of one year.
With notification in hand, there is a further flareup of tribals of South Gujarat, who say the notification is an “infringement” of their rights. Two well-established organizations, Adivasi Mahasabha and Adivasi Ekta Parishad, held out one the biggest rallies at Dediapada town, off Shoolpaneshwar on September 21, against the proposal for eco-sensitive zone.
Speaking at the 30,000-strong rally, which took place following a 6,000-strong rally a few days back, veteran tribal leader Chhotubhai Vasava said, declaring the area as eco-sensitive zone is “the first step” towards evicting the tribals from the region.
According to him, there is “no talk about tribals’ forest rights, as stipulated in the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, nor is there any talk about community rights of the forests, in the notification.”
“There has not been any consultation with the gram sabhas either, as required by the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), 1996, a law enacted by the Government of India to cover the scheduled areas to ensure consultation of the tribals before triggering any developmental project”, he pointed out.

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

India's 80% construction sites "unsafe", deaths 20 times higher than those in Britain

By Rajiv Shah
The Government of India may be seeking to project India’s construction sector as the country’s second-largest employer of the country after agriculture, providing jobs to more than 44 million people, and contributing nearly 9% to the national GDP, yet, ironically, its workforce is more unprotected than any other industrial sector of the country. Data suggest that the possibility of a fatality is five times more likely in the construction industry  than in a manufacturing industry, and the risk of a major injury is 2.5 times higher.

India sans Modi preferable, Congress worthier recipient of Indians’ votes: The Economist

By Our Representative
In a strongly-worded and crucial commentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi as the electoral political battle is on, influential British weekly “The Economist”, has declared that “Indians, who are in the midst of voting in a fresh election, would be better off with a different leader”, even as pointing out that that under Modi, “India’s ruling party poses a threat to democracy.”