Skip to main content

Take less from nature, give more back: A New Year’s resolution for a sustainable future

By Raj Kumar Sinha* 
As a new year begins, it is worth pausing to reflect on a simple but urgent resolution: take less from nature and give more back. This principle lies at the heart of sustainable living, and today it is no longer a moral choice alone but an existential necessity.
The natural world is a profound wonder that sustains our economies, our societies, and our very survival. Forests, rivers, oceans, soil, and biodiversity provide us with food, clean air, water for irrigation, and the raw materials that underpin agriculture, industry, and livelihoods. Economists often describe these assets as “natural capital,” acknowledging their immense contribution to human well-being and economic activity—from farming and forestry to tourism and recreation.
Over the past 50 to 70 years, global economic growth has accelerated at an unprecedented pace. Since 1950, global GDP has increased nearly tenfold, driven largely by industrial expansion, mining, fossil fuels, and rapid urbanisation. Even between 2020 and 2025, economic growth has continued. But the environmental cost of this growth has been staggering. Air, water, and soil pollution have intensified, biodiversity has declined sharply, climate change has accelerated, and natural resources are being depleted faster than the Earth can regenerate them.
Because nature is often treated as “free,” it is taken for granted and ruthlessly exploited. Forests are cleared, oceans are overfished, rivers are polluted, wetlands are built over, and minerals are extracted with little regard for long-term consequences. In the pursuit of comfort and material desire, human greed has disrupted the natural balance. The blind race for development has expanded industry, urbanisation, and consumption to such an extent that the environment’s capacity to cope has been overwhelmed. Dependence on coal, oil, and other fossil fuels has intensified global warming, glacier melt, and extreme weather events.
How we perceive nature matters. When nature is seen merely as a “resource,” destroying it feels acceptable. When it is seen as a “mother,” protection becomes instinctive. If societies and economies begin to truly understand nature’s value, they will prioritise living in harmony with it rather than sacrificing it for short-term gains.
The principle is straightforward: take from nature only what is necessary, and make every effort to give back. This balance is essential to ensure that future generations also have access to water, air, food, and fertile land. Using only the water we need, cutting only the wood that is essential, and restoring what we consume—by planting trees, conserving ecosystems, and respecting ecological limits—are not acts of charity but acts of responsibility.
“Taking the minimum and giving the maximum” is the core philosophy of sustainable development—development that balances environmental health, social well-being, and economic stability. This is not a new or radical idea. Indigenous and Adivasi communities have lived this way for generations. They did not separate the Earth from daily life; they understood rhythms, seasons, and cycles. They took what was necessary and left enough behind. This wisdom is not merely cultural knowledge; it is guidance for survival.
The widespread belief that humans are here to “save” nature misses the point. Nature does not need a rescue mission; it needs a partnership. Our consumption patterns reveal our values. What we buy, use, and discard reflects what we believe. Choosing locally made, handcrafted, and environmentally conscious products supports not just transactions, but communities, cultures, and conservation.
The stakes could not be higher. According to a European Commission report, human activity has pushed the planet toward a sixth mass extinction, with nearly one million species now at risk. In the last 50 years alone, more than half of the world’s birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and fish have disappeared. Extinction rates are now 100 to 1,000 times higher than in pre-human times—the largest biodiversity loss since the dinosaurs vanished. This crisis threatens food and water security, undermines physical and mental health, weakens economies, and reduces resilience to natural disasters.
Humanity’s resource consumption has exceeded the Earth’s annual capacity to regenerate those resources, exposing the unsustainability of modern consumption patterns. In India, current demand would require 2.6 times the country’s available natural resources to be met sustainably. With a population exceeding 1.4 billion, rising consumption is driving deforestation, biodiversity loss, and rapid climate change.
The question we must ask ourselves this year is simple but profound: can we set a collective goal where our demands align with what the Earth can provide?
If more of us slow down, consume thoughtfully, respect the limits of nature, and treat natural resources as finite and sacred, we can still build a future worth passing on. The choice is not between development and the environment. The real choice is between short-term greed and long-term survival.
---
*Bargi Dam Displaced and Affected Association

Comments

Sujata Raut said…
Awesome resolution Rajkumar.I will go by it.Appreciate the good work and your thoughts.All the best and prayers to mother earth.

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

India’s foreign policy at crossroads: Cost of silence in the face of aggression

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey  The widely anticipated yet unprovoked attack on Iran on March 1 by the United States and Israel has drawn sharp criticism from several quarters around the world. Reports indicate that the strikes have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including 165 elementary school girls, 20 female volleyball players, and many other civilians. 

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan*  A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".