Skip to main content

Pesticides Bill 2025 faces criticism – gaps risk more poisoning deaths, says expert

By A Representative
 
In a strongly worded submission to the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, public policy expert Dr. Donthi Narasimha Reddy has signaled a red alert: the Pesticides Management Bill, 2025, in its current form, is a paper tiger. Without sweeping amendments, this legislation risks becoming yet another ineffective administrative measure, incapable of stemming the tide of pesticide-related deaths and chronic health crises that continue to haunt India.
​Addressed to the Secretary at Krishi Bhavan, Dr. Reddy’s detailed 80-page critique argues that while the Bill introduces progressive elements like digital databases, it remains shackled to the outdated philosophy of the 1968 Insecticides Act. This fragmented regulatory landscape is precisely what has allowed devastating tragedies—from the 2013 Bihar poisonings to the recent 2025 Mysuru disaster—to repeat with sickening regularity.
​The fundamental failure of the Bill lies in its institutional architecture and its blindness to the modern realities of chemical exposure. Dr. Reddy identifies a weak institutional hierarchy where the Registration Committee functions as a parallel power center, rendering the Central Pesticides Board a mere advisory body without binding enforcement powers.
​This lack of accountability is compounded by a complete absence of traceability for the farm-to-fork chain of custody. In an era of e-commerce, unregulated digital pesticide sales and the continued circulation of banned substances like monocrotophos persist because the law lacks the teeth to track them.
​Furthermore, the Bill ignores the "invisible" victims of the pesticide industry. By failing to include women who wash contaminated clothes or informal family laborers in its definition of "workers," the legislation creates a critical gender and labor protection gap that leaves the most vulnerable populations entirely exposed.
​To transform this symbolic gesture into a robust tool for public health, the Ministry must incorporate a comprehensive suite of 54 amendments. This starts with renaming the legislation to the "Pesticide (Production, Distribution and Use) Management Bill, 2025" to reflect a broader, more defensive scope.
​Central to this reform is the regulation of "ordinary use" pesticides. Household and institutional pest control currently account for over 60% of poisoning deaths in India—as seen in the recent Chennai and Mysuru fatalities—yet the Bill virtually ignores this sector. Dr. Reddy proposes a dedicated chapter to regulate pest control operators, mandate re-entry safety protocols after fumigation, and ensure strict segregation from food and water sources.
​Beyond household safety, the Bill must establish a systematic poisoning surveillance system akin to the framework used for vaccine adverse events. Currently, hospitals lack the diagnostic criteria and national registers needed to respond to mass poisonings. This must be paired with strict corporate liability; Dr. Reddy advocates for a "Pesticide Victim Relief Fund" and legal provisions that prevent corporate directors from using a "lack of knowledge" defense to evade responsibility.
​The Central Pesticides Board itself must be diversified to include female farmers, agricultural workers, and civil society representatives to prevent it from becoming a bureaucratic rubber stamp. This inclusive governance is essential to ensure that the regulator remains accountable to those most impacted by its decisions.
​Dr. Reddy’s submission is a reminder that every day of legislative delay exacts a human cost. The tragedies in Yavatmal, Chennai, and Mysuru are not "accidents" of fate; they are the direct results of regulatory gaps that this Bill currently fails to plug.
​As the legislation advances toward Parliament, the Ministry has a brief window to move beyond mere paperwork and create a framework that prioritizes human lives over chemical convenience. Only by embracing these 54 amendments can the government ensure that the PMB 2025 becomes a genuine shield for India's farmers, workers, and consumers, rather than a witness to the next avoidable tragedy.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam*  Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle. 

Managing water in an era of climate stress: Indonesia’s governance challenge

By Alejandra Amor, Mansee Bal Bhargava  Indonesia, like many fast-developing nations including India, is grappling with a deepening water crisis driven by both human pressures and climate-induced impacts. Despite being home to more than 1,000 river basins, a majority of Indonesian households continue to face serious challenges in accessing safe drinking water and sanitation. Water resource management remains constrained by high levels of contamination, excessive dependence on groundwater, declining water retention capacity, and inadequate wastewater management systems.