Skip to main content

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative 
The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”
In a press statement issued from New Delhi, IPSN said the proposed board — with Trump as chair and including his son-in-law Jared Kushner and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — would further aggravate the suffering of Palestinians rather than address their long-standing political and humanitarian concerns. The statement was signed by IPSN representatives Ranjan Solomon, John Dayal, Maimoona Mollah and Vineet Tiwari.
According to IPSN, the initiative, presented as a framework for reconstruction and governance in Gaza and Palestine and already projected as being “in force,” prioritises external political and corporate interests over Palestinian autonomy, rights and self-determination. The organisation alleged that the plan effectively hands over control of Gaza to Israel while excluding Palestinians from meaningful participation in decisions about their own future.
Citing data from the Gaza Health Ministry and reports by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and UNRWA, IPSN said that since October 7, 2023, at least 72,437 Palestinians have been killed, 171,324 injured, and around 1.9 million displaced — nearly 90 per cent of Gaza’s pre-war population. It added that Gaza City, along with large parts of Khan Younis and Rafah, has been reduced to a “bombed-out landscape,” with widespread destruction of homes, schools, hospitals and other essential infrastructure.
The statement criticised the composition of the proposed Gaza board, alleging that its founding executive committee consists largely of US government figures, corporate leaders and individuals perceived as being closely aligned with Israeli interests or hostile to Palestinian aspirations. IPSN pointed to the confirmed participation of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom it described as the “chief architect of the mayhem” in Gaza.
Other named members include US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff, former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, Apollo Global Management CEO Marc Rowan, World Bank President Ajay Banga and Trump’s deputy national security adviser Robert Gabriel. An additional executive group reportedly includes Jared Kushner, Witkoff, Blair, Rowan, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, Qatari diplomat Ali Al-Thawadi, Egyptian intelligence chief Hassan Rashad, UAE minister Reem Al-Hashimy, Israeli businessman Yakir Gabay and Dutch Middle East expert Sigrid Kaag.
IPSN questioned the motives of several members, citing Kushner’s 2024 remarks describing Gaza’s coastline as having “development potential” and suggesting temporary relocation of civilians. It also highlighted links between key board members and major real estate, investment and financial interests.
The organisation objected to the reported requirement that participating countries commit at least USD 1 billion, while Palestinian authorities and civil society representatives are excluded from direct involvement. According to IPSN, such financial thresholds would automatically bar Palestinians from influencing decisions that directly affect their governance and reconstruction.
The statement also referred to ongoing proceedings at the International Criminal Court, noting that arrest warrants have been pursued against Netanyahu for alleged war crimes, including targeting civilians and restricting humanitarian aid. IPSN claimed that more than 80 per cent of Gaza’s housing has been damaged or destroyed.
IPSN argued that the proposed board focuses on selective regional partnerships and collaboration with Israel while ignoring core issues such as the Gaza blockade, Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and Palestinian self-determination under international law.
Calling for an alternative approach, IPSN said reconstruction of Gaza must be led by Palestinians themselves, with international support that respects their legal rights, priorities and entitlements, including the right of return and access to essential services. It urged the international community — including the United Nations, the European Union and countries of the Global South — to push for inclusive frameworks, legal accountability for violations of international law, compensation for victims, and transparent, locally driven rebuilding efforts centred on Palestinian well-being.
The Indo-Palestine Solidarity Network is a collective of activists and people’s organisations based in New Delhi and Goa, working on issues of human rights, democracy and peace. For further information, IPSN has provided contact details of its representatives, including Ranjan Solomon, John Dayal, Maimoona Mollah and Vineet Tiwari.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.
Post a Comment
»

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”
Post a Comment
»

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?
Post a Comment
»

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.
Post a Comment
»

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.
Post a Comment
»

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 
Post a Comment
»

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam*  Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle. 
Post a Comment
»

Managing water in an era of climate stress: Indonesia’s governance challenge

By Alejandra Amor, Mansee Bal Bhargava  Indonesia, like many fast-developing nations including India, is grappling with a deepening water crisis driven by both human pressures and climate-induced impacts. Despite being home to more than 1,000 river basins, a majority of Indonesian households continue to face serious challenges in accessing safe drinking water and sanitation. Water resource management remains constrained by high levels of contamination, excessive dependence on groundwater, declining water retention capacity, and inadequate wastewater management systems.
Post a Comment
»