Skip to main content

India’s Rohingya dilemma: Deportation, security concerns, and humanitarian challenges

By Nava Thakuria* 
Even though India provides shelter to nearly 20 million undocumented individuals from neighboring countries such as Pakistan, Nepal, Tibet, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, and Bangladesh, the Union government in New Delhi has consistently maintained a strict stance against illegal migrants—often termed infiltrators, asylum seekers, or refugees—particularly from Pakistan since independence. However, in recent years, both the government and the people of the South Asian nation have taken a unified stand against Bangladeshi nationals and Rohingya refugees from western Myanmar, portraying them as security threats and instigators of demographic changes and social unrest. This shift in perception intensified following the Pahalgam terror attack in Kashmir, where 26 innocent civilians were brutally killed by Islamist militants, allegedly with backing from the Pakistani regime in Islamabad.  
Following the 22 April Pahalgam attack, a massive wave of public outrage swept across India, demanding decisive retaliation against Pakistan. This led to an escalation in armed conflicts between the two neighbors, prompting New Delhi to launch Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist hideouts in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and mainland Pakistan. A bilateral agreement for cessation of hostilities was reached on 10 May, yet widespread anger against Pakistan persists among the majority of Indians. Even the Supreme Court has criticized the government for its delay in deporting illegal migrants. Recently, the apex court rejected a plea to halt the deportation of Rohingya Muslim migrants and refused to hear a petition alleging the abandonment of 38 Rohingya refugees in the Andaman Sea near Myanmar’s coast, dismissing it as a "very beautifully crafted story."  
The petition claimed that New Delhi deported these Rohingyas despite their possession of identity cards issued by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Reports suggest that they were transported from Delhi to Sri Vijaya Puram (formerly Port Blair), the capital of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, in early May. Allegedly, they were placed on a ship with life jackets near Myanmar’s coast, with assurances that someone would rescue them. A civil society group, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), condemned the alleged deportation, describing it as inhumane and illegal under both domestic and international guidelines.  
The growing Rohingya issue has prompted both the central and state governments to take visible action against individuals who either enter India illegally or overstay their visas. An estimated 40,000 Rohingyas currently reside in Telangana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, Jammu & Kashmir, and other regions. These Muslim residents from Rakhine (Arakan) province of Myanmar faced brutal military crackdowns in 2016 and 2017, leading to the displacement of over 700,000 Rohingyas to neighboring Bangladesh. Their repatriation has remained uncertain, particularly after the military coup in Myanmar in February 2021, which triggered armed conflicts between the Myanmar military junta and ethnic armed groups, including the Arakan Army.  
Meanwhile, the Border Guards Bangladesh (BGB) alleged that India had pushed over 2,000 individuals into Bangladesh since 1 May, without official notification. BGB Director General Ashrafuzzaman Siddiqui claimed that many Bengali-speaking Indian Muslims were also forced across the borders of West Bengal, Assam, and Tripura. Political leaders, security experts, and the general public have expressed serious concerns over this practice, deeming it illogical and illegal. They questioned the deportation of Rohingyas to Bangladesh, arguing that they are not Bangladeshi citizens but Myanmar nationals. BGB officials reportedly detained at least five UNHCR-recognized Rohingya refugees, who were allegedly pushed into Bangladesh by Indian authorities.  
Dhaka has made it clear that it will only accept individuals confirmed as Bangladeshi citizens and repatriate them through official channels. Bangladeshi authorities have demanded an end to this practice, labeling it a threat to their sovereignty, despite the fact that Rohingyas originally entered India from Bangladesh.  
On 23 May, the UNHCR issued a media statement from Geneva, expressing concern over two reported boat tragedies that resulted in the deaths of over 400 Rohingya refugees near Myanmar’s coast. The UN refugee agency stated that approximately 514 Rohingyas traveled on two separate boats—one carrying 267 people, more than half of whom likely departed from Rohingya refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, while the rest left Rakhine province, Myanmar. The boat sank on 9 May, with only 66 survivors. Another boat carrying 247 Rohingyas (from both Cox’s Bazar camps and Rakhine) capsized on 10 May, leaving only 21 survivors.  
Hai Kyung Jun, UNHCR’s regional director, remarked:  
"The dire humanitarian situation, exacerbated by funding cuts, is having a devastating impact on the lives of Rohingya, with more and more resorting to dangerous journeys to seek safety, protection, and a dignified life for themselves and their families. The latest tragedy is a chilling reminder that access to meaningful protection, especially in countries of first asylum, as well as responsibility sharing and collective efforts along sea routes, are essential to saving lives." 
UNHCR has urged the international community to stand in solidarity with countries hosting Rohingya refugees. Until conditions in Rakhine become peaceful and conducive to safe and voluntary repatriation, the global community must continue supporting efforts to provide life-saving assistance to Rohingya refugees. The UN agency has stated that it requires $383.1 million in 2025 to stabilize the lives of refugees and their host communities across Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and displaced populations within Myanmar. However, only 30 percent of this amount has been received so far.  
---
*Senior journalist based in Guwahati 

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”