Skip to main content

What led to AAP defeat in Delhi? Relying heavily on 'lower' classes, not 'general' public!

By Rajiv Shah 
I was talking to a close acquaintance in Delhi about the recent, allegedly crushing, defeat of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). This person, once a great supporter of the India Against Corruption movement that led to AAP’s formation, said the main reason for the party’s defeat was that it "didn't do anything for the general public." According to him, this went against the party, which had ruled the state for three terms.
And what did he mean by "general public"? He didn't utter the words "upper castes", but this is exactly what he meant. In fact, he explained that only people from the "lower classes" had heavily voted for AAP because the party’s policies primarily benefited them. By "lower classes," he clarified, he meant Dalits, Other Backward Classes (OBCs), and migrants from other parts of India, especially Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, who had settled in Delhi, often in slums and poorer localities.
"For instance," he said, "who goes to government schools, which the AAP government improved significantly? Only the lower classes. The general public sends their children to private schools." He also argued that the so-called "freebies" provided by the AAP government—such as free electricity for up to 200 units—mainly benefited the lower classes, not the general public. "AAP did nothing for the general public", he underlined.
"As a result," he continued, "during the AAP government, the lower classes became emboldened—to the extent that they often clashed with the general public. This angered the general public, leading them to vote for the BJP." He linked this resentment to the government's failure to clean up the Yamuna River, which, according to him, was a major demand of the general public.
When asked whether the BJP would continue the freebies introduced by AAP, he said, "They have promised to do so. If they remove them, they will face the same fate as AAP. The Union budget announcement during the elections, increasing the no-tax income threshold from ₹7 lakh to ₹12 lakh, was a boon for the general public."
He added that other factors contributing to AAP’s defeat included the poor condition of roads, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s allegedly extravagant residence, erratic drinking water supply, corruption charges against AAP leaders—especially the liquor scam—and the party’s promise to give ₹2,100 per month to poor women, which was outmatched by the BJP’s offer of ₹2,500.
When asked whether the arrest of three key AAP leaders—Kejriwal, Somnath Bharti, and Satyendar Jain—who were responsible for improving education and healthcare services had led to governance paralysis and contributed to AAP's defeat, he replied, "This is what AAP leaders are claiming."
However, during our 45-minute conversation, he did not mention how the Narendra Modi government had stripped the Delhi government of significant powers. The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Act, 2023, curtailed the Delhi government’s authority while increasing the control of the Lieutenant Governor (LG) and the Central government over Delhi’s administration.
The law established an authority to oversee the transfers and postings of Delhi government officials, with the LG having the final say—even if the elected government disagreed. As a result, the Delhi government lost control over services, appointments, and bureaucratic transfers, while the Delhi Assembly’s legislative powers in these matters were significantly curtailed.
This law was introduced following a May 2023 Supreme Court ruling that stated the Delhi government should have control over services (except police, public order, and land). The Central government overrode this ruling, arguing that since Delhi is a Union Territory, it cannot have full state-like powers. AAP strongly opposed the law, calling it a violation of federal principles.
The Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), which conducted an extensive analysis of caste dynamics in Delhi's electoral politics, supports this person’s observations. Conducted jointly with Lokniti, the survey found that the BJP secured high vote shares among so-called upper castes: Brahmins (66%), Vaishyas (66%), Punjabi Khatris (67%), and Rajputs (60%). 
Additionally, the party received significant backing from OBCs (55%), excluding Gujjars and Yadavs, where its vote share was relatively lower. However, BJP's support among Muslims (15%) and Valmikis (25%) remained weak.
Meanwhile, AAP’s core voter base included Valmikis (67%), Jatavs (59%), and Muslims (65%). Other likely AAP voters included migrants, mainly Purvanchalis from eastern Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, who constitute about 25% of Delhi’s population.

Comments

TRENDING

10,000 students deprived of classes as Ahmedabad school remains shut: MCC writes to Gujarat CM

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) has written to Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, urging him to immediately reopen the Seventh Day Adventist School in Maninagar, Ahmedabad, where classes have been suspended for nearly two weeks. The MCC claims that the suspension, following a violent incident, violates the constitutional right to education of thousands of children.

On Teachers’ Day, remembering Mother Teresa as the teacher of compassion

By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ   It is Teachers’ Day once again! Significantly, the day also marks the Feast of St. Teresa of Calcutta (still lovingly called Mother Teresa). In 2012, the United Nations, as a fitting tribute to her, declared this day the International Day of Charity. A day pregnant with meaning—one that we must celebrate as meaningfully as possible.

Gujarat minority rights group seeks suspension of Botad police officials for brutal assault on minor

By A Representative   A human rights group, the Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat,  has written to the Director General of Police (DGP), Gandhinagar, demanding the immediate suspension and criminal action against police personnel of Botad police station for allegedly brutally assaulting a minor boy from the Muslim community.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

What mainstream economists won’t tell you about Chinese modernisation

By Shiran Illanperuma  China’s modernisation has been one of the most remarkable processes of the 21st century and one that has sparked endless academic debate. Meng Jie (孟捷), a distinguished professor from the School of Marxism at Fudan University in Shanghai, has spent the better part of his career unpacking this process to better understand what has taken place.

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative  With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

Is U.S. fast losing its financial and technological edge under Trump’s second tenure?

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra*  The United States, along with its Western European allies, once promoted globalization as a democratic force that would deliver shared prosperity and balanced growth. That promise has unraveled. Globalization, instead of building an even world, has produced one defined by inequality, asymmetry of power, and new vulnerabilities. For decades, Washington successfully turned this system to its advantage. Today, however, under Trump’s second administration, America is attempting to exploit the weaknesses of others without acknowledging how exposed it has become itself.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”