Skip to main content

Another concerted effort by an RSS ideologue to undermine, reject India's religious diversity

By Ram Puniyani* 
“Hindu Society is the Nation’s Responsible Core—Sangh seeks to unite Hindu society, as it is the Hindu society… that carries the responsibility of the nation.”
— Mohan Bhagwat, Indian Express, Mumbai Edition, Feb 17, 2025.
These are the words of Mohan Bhagwat, the chief of the RSS, while addressing RSS workers in Bardhaman, West Bengal. He further stated that “Hindus are those who embody India’s characteristics and keep its diverse population united.”
On a tour of West Bengal, Mr. Bhagwat's assertion is not only in contrast to the values enshrined in the Indian Constitution but also contradicts the history of this country. The Constitution of India defines “We, the people of India” as a religion-neutral phrase, encompassing all citizens regardless of their faith. Unlike the RSS ideology, which emphasizes Hindu society as the core of the nation, the Indian Constitution upholds equal rights and responsibilities for people of all religions.
There is a concerted effort by RSS ideologues to undermine and reject India's religious diversity. The beautiful term Ganga-Jamuni Tehzeeb, which symbolizes India's composite culture, is often criticized by RSS supporters. They argue that it distorts Hindu culture, which, according to them, has existed unchanged throughout history.
The term Hindu was originally a geographical reference used by those who crossed the Sindhu River centuries ago. Since certain non-native speakers pronounced ‘S’ as ‘H,’ the term became Hindu. Initially, it was merely a geographical label, but over time, various non-prophetic traditions were grouped under this identity. The Persian chronicler Minhaj-e-Siraj first used the term in the 13th century to refer to the region now comprising Punjab, Haryana, and the land between the Ganga and Yamuna. Politically, it denoted the territories under the Delhi Sultanate. Later, in the 14th century, Amir Khusrau, a disciple of Nizamuddin Auliya, popularized the term for the South Asian region.
Emperor Ashoka, who embraced Buddhism, ruled over a vast empire and promoted religious coexistence among Vedic (Brahmanical), Jain, Ajivika, and Buddhist traditions. Buddhism remained the dominant faith until Pushyamitra Shunga persecuted it. Over time, various Shramanic traditions—such as Nath, Tantra, Shaiva, Siddhanta, and Bhakti—flourished alongside Brahmanical traditions.
Christianity arrived in India with St. Thomas, who established a church on the Malabar Coast in AD 52. It grew slowly, mainly among Adivasis and Dalits. Islam arrived in the 7th century through Arab traders, and later, many marginalized groups from the caste system embraced it. From the 11th century onwards, Muslim dynasties such as the Ghulams, Khiljis, Lodhis, and eventually the Mughals ruled from Delhi. However, before them, groups like the Shakas and Huns had already settled in India. The interactions between these diverse cultures shaped Indian civilization.
During the medieval period, cultural exchanges became even more pronounced. The linguistic fusion of Persian and Awadhi gave rise to Urdu. Interestingly, one of Hinduism’s major traditions, Kumbh Mela, includes the Shahi Snan (royal bath), which has now been renamed Amrit Snan (nectar bath) under the current Hindu nationalist government.
People from different communities participated in each other's festivals. Holi and Muharram were celebrated socially across religious lines. The Mughal courts observed Diwali as Jashn-e-Charagan and Holi as Jashn-e-Gulabi. The Bhakti and Sufi movements further bridged the religious divide—Bhakti saint Kabir’s followers included both Hindus and Muslims, and Sufi dargahs attracted devotees of all faiths. Even today, people of all religions visit the Velankanni Church. The Alliance of Civilizations, a high-level UN committee formed under Kofi Annan, recognized that cultures and religions worldwide have positively influenced one another through mutual interaction.
India’s freedom struggle further strengthened these interfaith bonds. Interestingly, Mohan Bhagwat and his ideological allies were entirely absent from this movement. Revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh and Ashfaqullah Khan fought side by side, while the Indian National Congress—led by figures like Badruddin Tyabji, R.M. Sayani, and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad—steered the movement with enthusiasm. People of all religions contributed to this struggle. The only groups that distanced themselves were the Muslim League, the Hindu Mahasabha, and the RSS—organizations that rejected the inclusive idea of India: A Nation in the Making.
This struggle not only fostered unity among religious communities but also reinforced India's multicultural identity. In contrast, groups like the Muslim League and RSS built their nationalism on religious exclusivity. Gandhi and other leaders, however, laid the foundation for a secular, pluralistic India, which was enshrined in the Constitution. Bhagwat, on the other hand, reduces national responsibility to Hindus alone.
The RSS claims to uphold Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is one family), yet its actions—such as Ram Temple agitation, Ghar Wapsi, Love Jihad campaigns, and cow-related vigilantism—promote hostility toward minorities. These activities not only lead to violence but also intimidate large sections of society.
India, like the rest of the world, is a vibrant mosaic of diversity. To claim that only Hindus are responsible for the nation is divisive and misleading. Every Indian, irrespective of religion, shares both rights and responsibilities toward the country.
---

Comments

TRENDING

10,000 students deprived of classes as Ahmedabad school remains shut: MCC writes to Gujarat CM

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) has written to Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, urging him to immediately reopen the Seventh Day Adventist School in Maninagar, Ahmedabad, where classes have been suspended for nearly two weeks. The MCC claims that the suspension, following a violent incident, violates the constitutional right to education of thousands of children.

Gujarat minority rights group seeks suspension of Botad police officials for brutal assault on minor

By A Representative   A human rights group, the Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat,  has written to the Director General of Police (DGP), Gandhinagar, demanding the immediate suspension and criminal action against police personnel of Botad police station for allegedly brutally assaulting a minor boy from the Muslim community.

On Teachers’ Day, remembering Mother Teresa as the teacher of compassion

By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ   It is Teachers’ Day once again! Significantly, the day also marks the Feast of St. Teresa of Calcutta (still lovingly called Mother Teresa). In 2012, the United Nations, as a fitting tribute to her, declared this day the International Day of Charity. A day pregnant with meaning—one that we must celebrate as meaningfully as possible.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative  With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

Is U.S. fast losing its financial and technological edge under Trump’s second tenure?

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra*  The United States, along with its Western European allies, once promoted globalization as a democratic force that would deliver shared prosperity and balanced growth. That promise has unraveled. Globalization, instead of building an even world, has produced one defined by inequality, asymmetry of power, and new vulnerabilities. For decades, Washington successfully turned this system to its advantage. Today, however, under Trump’s second administration, America is attempting to exploit the weaknesses of others without acknowledging how exposed it has become itself.

What mainstream economists won’t tell you about Chinese modernisation

By Shiran Illanperuma  China’s modernisation has been one of the most remarkable processes of the 21st century and one that has sparked endless academic debate. Meng Jie (孟捷), a distinguished professor from the School of Marxism at Fudan University in Shanghai, has spent the better part of his career unpacking this process to better understand what has taken place.