Skip to main content

'Unjust, insensitive': Retired civil servants condemn Justice Gavai’s remarks on homelessness

By A Representative 
The Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), a collective of retired civil servants and diplomats, has issued an open letter to Justice B.R. Gavai of the Supreme Court of India, expressing deep concern over his recent remarks on homelessness.
During a hearing on 12 February 2025 regarding the provision of shelter for homeless persons, Justice Gavai reportedly stated, “By not making these people part of mainstream society, are we not creating a class of parasites? Because of freebies, when elections are declared...people are not willing to work. They are getting free rations without doing any work!” The CCG, citing legal reports and accounts from those present in court, condemned this characterization as unjust and insensitive.
The letter, signed by 71 former civil servants, highlights that homelessness is not a result of idleness or an undue demand for “freebies,” but rather a consequence of the state failing to uphold its Constitutional duties. It argues that the Directive Principles of State Policy mandate the state to ensure dignified living conditions, including access to housing, employment, food security, healthcare, and protection from violence.
The group also pointed out the stark contrast in how “freebies” are defined, questioning why corporate tax breaks and loan write-offs are not scrutinized in the same manner as welfare measures for the most vulnerable.
Recalling past Supreme Court judgments, the letter refers to the landmark Right to Food case (PUCL vs. Union of India, 2001), in which Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Dipak Gupta had ruled that protecting homeless individuals from life-threatening conditions was a core state obligation under Article 21 of the Constitution. That ruling led to the creation of over 2,000 shelters nationwide, though the CCG notes that many remain overcrowded and unsanitary.
The letter criticizes recent demolitions of homeless shelters in Delhi ahead of the G20 Summit, calling them a violation of Constitutional duties. It urges the government and judiciary to focus on long-term solutions, such as affordable rental housing, urban employment programs, and universal access to social security.
Concluding with Mahatma Gandhi’s talisman—urging leaders to consider the impact of their actions on the poorest and weakest—the CCG implores the Supreme Court to uphold its moral and Constitutional responsibility toward India’s homeless population.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Hoping against despair after Myanmar President’s visit to India

By Nava Thakuria  Myanmar President U Min Aung Hlaing’s five-day official visit to India from 30 May to 3 June 2026 drew attention both in New Delhi and in India’s northeastern region, where policymakers and residents closely follow developments in the neighbouring country. The visit was significant because it touched on several issues of mutual concern, including security cooperation, border management, connectivity projects, trade, and regional stability.

Beyond data: The economist who refused to remain in the ivory tower

By Vikas Meshram   There are few people who are born into privilege yet choose to dedicate their lives to the cause of the poor. Jean Drèze is one such individual. Born on January 22, 1959, in Leuven, Belgium, into the family of a distinguished economist, Drèze has become one of the most influential voices in the study of poverty, inequality, and social policy in India. Having lived in India since 1979, he adopted Indian citizenship in 2002 and has since played a pivotal role in shaping some of the country's most important welfare initiatives.