Skip to main content

Malaysia’s PDRM law unto itself: Open letter to country's IG of Police Acryl Sani Abdullah

By Jeswan Kaur* 

“The road to hell is paved with good intentions” but this profound understanding is lost on Malaysia’s police force, Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM).
In 2020, I stepped into the office of a senior police officer, Masrol Riadi, to discuss my case (a criminal intimidation matter) and his first words were “Mata kamu mengsteamkan” which in English would mean “your eyes arouse me.”
That was the first red flag I noticed. Then came the good morning messages and videos. My reprimanding him did not help nor did my reminding Masrol that I could report him for sexual harassment.
I made my way to the city’s top cop and demanded an explanation as to how the police would deal with such lecherous officer and who had messed up my case.
I was assured the cop concerned would be rebuked. I was then told to lodge a report against him with ASP Nori Mt from the Disciplinary Unit.
It did not take me long to realise that ASP Nori was a diva in disguise and loved every bit of attention coming her way as seen through the pictures she constantly posted on her WhatsApp status. Whilst the public was threatened with a fine if they refused to wear the face mask during lockdown, she was all over the place without a face mask.
When I requested that she set a good example as a cop, ASP Nori blocked my number.
As for my earlier case, that involving criminal intimidation, I was referred to an ASP Noor Zarini.
Mr IGP, all three cops I dealt with had no qualms behaving as if they are above the law. Noor Zarini like Nori never bothered updating me about my case as perhaps a VIP’s case “carried more weight”.
My last WhatsApp communication with Noor Zarini dated August 1, 2022 went: “Puan ASP, what’s happening to my case?”. Her reply: “hi good morning mem. Lama I tak update dengan you…minta maaf…disebabkan sibuk dgn tugas baru saya ini.”
(She apologised for not updating me as she was busy with her new responsibility).
When I responded “That’s no excuse. Its’s a serious matter,” Noor Zarini blocked my number.
Mr IGP, I spent hours going back and forth the police station because your officers in blue were incompetent and irresponsible. Yet, I remained determined to seek redress for my case and am still waiting.
I noticed a similar “couldn’t care less” attitude at the Sexual Women and Children’s Investigation Division (D11) with officers like Sergeant Nurhafezah.
Mr IGP, is this your idea of all is well with PDRM?

IPCMC a collateral damage

For the longest time, 17 years now, repeated calls were made to reform PDRM but none saw the light of day.
PDRM’s notoriety remains uncanny, from custodial deaths to rape and nude squats in police lock-ups. That the image of the police force desperately begs rehabilitation is an understatement.
Yet, the powers that be found no reason for alarm and decided all is well with PDRM.
Had this been true, Meta would have no basis to accuse PDRM of masterminding a troll farm designed to “corrupt or manipulate public discourse.”
In its Adversarial Threat Report for the Second Quarter of 2022 released last month, Meta exposed Malaysia's police force as the hand behind the troll farm.
The Meta revelations about individuals behind the PDRM troll farm say they were active on Facebook, TikTok, Twitter and Instagram, they posted memes in Malay, supported the current government coalition and made claims of corruption amongst the current Barisan Nasional’s critics.
They also created Facebook Pages that posed as independent news entities and promoted police while criticising the opposition.
(PDRM enforces the laws of the country, including the Internet. In fact, they have a Cyber & Multimedia Criminal Investigation Unit under the Commercial Crime Investigation Department. It works together with the National Cyber Security Agency [NACSA] to tackle cybersecurity threats, and these would include malicious influence campaigns).
Soon after Meta's bombshell disclosure, PDRM through its secretary Noorsiah Mohd Saaduddin whilst denying the police's involvement inch unscrupulous acts, said it took the allegations seriously and was in the midst of collecting information about them.
PDRM's slapdash reaction to the allegations was no move in the right direction. How did PDRM conclude that the force is "clean" when information gathering was still on-going?
To abdicate responsibility over wrongdoings has been the way of life for Malaysian government agencies and PDRM is no exception. I, Mr IGP, am among those who can bear witness to this.

IPCMC saw no light of day

Transparency International Malaysia in a letter to editor last year bemoaned the lack of political will to put in place the much pleaded for Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC).
(The IPCMC was mooted by the Royal Commission to enhance the Operation and Management of PDRM, headed by former chief justice Mohamed Dzaiddin Abdullah in 2005, the objective being to improve oversight and allow independent investigation and punishment for errant, abusive and corrupt officers across the rank and file._
IPCMC sadly never saw the light of day during the reign of the Barisan Nasional government.
A glimmer of hope came the country's way when the Pakatan Harapan government tabled the IPCMC Bill in 2019 only to have it deferred for review by a parliamentary select committee due to "lack of consultation".
The death knell came when the Pakatan Harapan administration collapsed in February 2020. Its successor, the Perikatan Nasional (PN) government, was more concerned about securing vote banks to secure power. It got rid of IPCMC and replaced it with a watered down Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) Bill.
Then prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin nonchalantly tabled the IPCC Bill in Dewan Rakyat on August 26, 2020. He was soon shown the door and replaced by an equally incompetent and unscrupulous premier, Ismail Sabri Yaakob, who decided best to go with the flow vis-à-vis the feeble IPCC Bill.
The IPCMC saga spanned 17 years, rejected each time by all four governments and five prime ministers. The seven inspector-generals of police that came and went were at best hapless as the IPCMC suffered four name changes .
Transparency International Malaysia went through a similar anguish when its repeated calls for the IPCMC to be enforced were dismissed.
Last year inspector-general of police Abdul Hamid Bador revealed a police culture of corruption among police personnel. Now, news of a PDRM-operated troll farm has added more fuel to the raging fire that all is definitely not well with PDRM.
Ti-Malaysia president Dr Muhammad Mohan then said it was shocking there were cartels within PDRM who both protected and colluded with criminal organisations and individuals and remained powerful enough to throttle the inspector-general of police's position and hamper his efforts to investigate them.
Equally frustrated was Johor police chief Ayob Khan who was reported as saying he would charge errant police officers in court instead of referring them to PDRM’s Integrity Department (Jips) with regards to these officers’ misconduct.
Then there was news that a purported whistleblower who had revealed names of police personnel said to be involved in abuse of power, protecting, abetting, conspiring and accepting bribes from the syndicates (such as Nicky Liow and Addy Kana) was arrested.
Mr IGP, had I not been a journalist would you thrash my “revelation” that PDRM has become a law unto itself?
Is silencing the common voice the easy and safe way out for PDRM?
---
*Journalist based in Malaysia

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.