Skip to main content

BSF action to grab poor Bengal farmers' land 'arbitrary', affects villagers' life, livelihood

Counterview Desk 

The Border Security Force (BSF) allegedly grabbed the land of two marginal farmers “on orders from above” in January this year in Dinajpur district of West Bengal, yet, despite complaints to the administrative and police authorities, no action has been taken in this regard, says a complaint filed with the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) chairman.
In a plea, based on a finding of a fact-finding team, to the NHRC chairman, Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convenor Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), Hooghly, said, the land acquisition “has not complied with the Land Acquisition Act, 1894"; hence it is “illegal grabbing”.

Text:

I want to attract your attention towards the illegitimate restrictions and livelihood violation of the villagers of Dhalgaon village of 1 no Bhatol Gram Panchayat under Raiganj Block and police station in North Dinajpur District of West Bengal by the Border Security Force personnel with ECO company of Poriyal border outpost under 72 battalion BSF
About 1,500 people reside in the Dhalgaon village, where out of the total population about 850 are male and 650 are female. Almost 80 percent of the villagers belong from Muslim Other Backward Class (OBC) and 20 percent from Hindu Scheduled Caste (Dalit) backgrounds.
About 1,800 bigha of cultivable land in the village is located outside the border fencing, which is heavily guarded by the Border Security Force (BSF). In this village there are no government hospitals, no ration shop, only one SSK (Sishu Siksha Karmasuchi) school is situated in this village. There is no secondary and higher secondary school in this village.
The condition of the village road is very bad. Most of the roads in the village are not metalled. Due to the plying of BSF vehicles on the village road, the condition of the road became more deteriorated. There are no irrigation facilities in the village.
Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin Mohammad are two residents of Dhalgaon village. Previously, Taslim Ali resided in the land situated 20 meter distance from the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) Road and in front of fencing gate number 18 of Pariyal Border Out Post. In the year 1989 Taslim Ali and his wife Rejina Khatun bought a total 12.20 satak of land under Dhalgaon Mouza, JL No 11 from Jasera Begum, Md Bellal Sarkar, Buna Khatun, Laila Khatun, Rehena Khatun and Nureja Khatun in consideration of Rs. 4,11,750.
But due to illegitimate and arbitrary restriction by the BSF personnel attached with Pariyal Border Out Post, he moved away from that place and made a house far from the border fencing. Now he runs his family by cultivating different vegetables in that land where he previously resided.
Mahamuddin Mohammad is also the owner of the 0.06 acre land under Dhalgaon Mouza, JL No 11, Khatian No 312. The said land is situated between Parial Border Out Post and the fencing gate number 18 in front of the railing number 1419-1397 and 20 to 75 meter distance from the barbed wire.
Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin Mohammad both run their family by cultivating different vegetables and bananas in their land. On 15 January, 2022 at midnight Border Security Force personnel grabbed the whole land of Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin. BSF personnel buried bamboo poles at the margin of the land and the BSF Battalion number and Border Out Post there. 
They do not allow Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin to enter their agricultural field. From that day, they cannot work in their agricultural field. BSF told them that the area is now under BSF’s jurisdiction and therefore they possessed over those lands and cannot allow anyone to enter in that area.
Taslim and Mahamuddin informed the above stated incident to the Panchayat Pradhan of 1 no. Bhatol Gram Panchayat. Pnachayat Pradhan along with other members went to Pariyal Border Out Post but the BSF personnel did not listen to their words. BSF told them to bring the map of those lands from the Block Land and Land Revenue Office.
When Taslim and Mahamuddin went to the office of the Block Land and Land Revenue Officer, Raiganj and asked for a land map of that area, the officials refused to provide them any map of the bordering areas.
From January, 2022 they cannot enter their field. BSF personnel do not allow them to enter their fields. As they cannot cultivate vegetables in this season their monetary loss is about Rs. 50,000.
Our fact finding team talked with one Gram Panchayat member Prakash Barman. He informed that all villagers know the fact that the owners of those two lands are Taslim Ali and Mr. Mahamuddin Mohammad but BSF personnel by force grab those lands without showing any documentary evidence.
One Md Nasiruddin, aged about 55 years, son of late Abdul Jabbar, a resident of the Dhalgaon village informed our fact finding team that BSF personnel attached with Poriyal Border Out Post, ‘E’ Company, Battalion number 72 put illegitimate and arbitrary restrictions upon the agricultural activities of the villagers. For the last two years villagers cannot cultivate maize crops in their agricultural fields. BSF issued an arbitrary prohibition on the cultivation of the maize crops.
Our fact finding team talked with Madanlal, Post Commander of the Poriyal Border Out Post, ‘E’ Company, Battalion number 72. He informed that if there is any allegation of the villagers, they can file civil suit against them. They have an order from higher authority, so they have taken possession of the land. They do not want any harm to common people.
On 25.07.22, Mr.Taslim Ali and Mr. Mahamuddin lodged written complaints to the Block Development Officer of Raiganj block and the Sub-Divisional Officer of Raigunj Sub-Division and District Magistrate, Uttar Dinajpur. On 26.07.2022 Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin lodged written complaint to the local Bhatol Police Fari (Out Post).
But the on duty police person did not accept the complaint. As the local police did not take any action in this regard, on 02.08.2022 he sent one written complaint on the above stated matter to the Superintendent of Police of North Dinajpur through registered post. 
BSF move to restrict the entry of the victims in their agricultural field has plunged their families into deeper poverty
However, till time no actions were taken by the authority to seek out the matter. The whole process was not complied with The Land Acquisition Act, 1894; hence it is illegal grabbing of land by BSF.
These whimsical actions and arbitrary restriction imposed by the Border Security Force personnel of Poriyal Border Outposts upon the villagers of Dhalgaon is not only challenging their life and livelihood but also violating the Article 21 and Article 19 (1) (g) and 39(a) of the Constitution of India and Article 12 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The plight of the villagers and denial of their proper livelihood practices is against the Articles 6 (Right to Work), 7 (Right to enjoyment just and favorable condition of work), 9 (Right to Social Security) and 11 (Right to adequate Standard of living) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) as well as the goal number 8 and 16 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
In all these international instruments, the Government of India is a party and has taken pledge to adhere with. The affected farmers’ family is in poor financial condition. They earn their living from agricultural work but this arbitrary action of the BSF to restrict the entry of the victims in their agricultural field, has plunged their families into deeper poverty.
While the Government of India has been considering implementing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals within 2030 and where the first goal is to eliminate poverty and eighth goal is to promote sustained inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all, but the agent of the government (here BSF) by restricting the movement of the victim farmers in their agricultural land pushed them and their family members in the face of poverty and snatched their right to decent work.
The non-action of the concerned department after lodging the complaint by the victims before the administration also violates Goal number 16 of the UN SDG for providing access to justice for all. Illegal grabbing of the victim’s land by the BSF is a violation of Article 300A of the Indian Constitution, the right to enjoyment of personal property.
Under the circumstances, I request your urgent intervention in the following matters:
  • The whole process was not complied with The Land Acquisition Act, 1894; hence it is illegal grabbing of land by BSF.
  • The BSF should be careful about the villagers, where they posted.
  • The BSF should be posted at the zero point outside the village area.
  • The whole incident must be investigated by a neutral agency.
  • Block and District administration must take immediate steps for restoration of possession of those above stated lands to Mr. Taslim Ali and Mr. Mahamuddin Mohammad.
  • The BSF and / or district administration of Uttar Dinajpur should provide monetary compensation for the loss that the victim farmers have incurred.
  • Strict action should be taken against the BSF for illegally confiscating the victims’ land. As it is a civic offence, matters should be heard in open court of law.
  • The Block Land and Land Reforms Department, Raiganj immediately take proper steps against the perpetrator BSF personnel who grabbed the victims’ land and imposed illegal restriction to victim farmers to enter their agricultural field.
  • Safety and security of the victims must be ensured.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Whole article is far away from reality.

TRENDING

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Subaltern voices go digital: Three Indian projects rewriting history from the ground up

By A Representative   A new wave of digital humanities (DH) work in India is shifting the focus away from university classrooms and English-language scholarship, instead prioritizing multilingual, community-driven archives that amplify subaltern voices . According to a review published in the Journal of Asian Studies , projects such as the People’s Archive of Rural India (PARI), the Oral History Narmada archive , and the Bhasha Research and Publication Centre are redefining how the country remembers its past — often without government funding or institutional support.

Beyond Lata: How Asha Bhosle redefined the female voice with her underrated versatility

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The news of iconic Asha Bhosle’s ‘untimely’ demise has shocked music lovers across the country. Asha Tai was 92 years young. Normally, people celebrate a passing at this age, but Asha Bhosle—much like another legend, Dev Anand—never made us feel she was growing old. She was perhaps the most versatile artist in Bombay cinema. Hailing from a family devoted to music, Asha’s journey to success and fame was not easy. Her elder sister, Lata Mangeshkar, had already become the voice of women in cinema, and most contemporaries like Shamshad Begum, Suraiya, and Noor Jehan had slowly faded into oblivion. Frankly, there was no second or third to Lata Mangeshkar; she became the first—and perhaps the only—choice for music directors and all those who mattered in filmmaking. Asha started her musical journey at age 10 with a Marathi film, but her first break in Hindustani cinema came with the film "Chunariya" (1948). Though she was not the first choice of ...