Skip to main content

Systematic operation of Sardar Sarovar dam 'helped avert' severe flood in Bharuch

By KV Sanghavi, JB Patel, Dr VM Yagnik, LS Sharma*

Narmada is the fifth largest river in the country and is the largest west flowing river. It also represents a classic example of integrated river basin planning and development, implemented successfully. Sardar Sarovar being the last terminal dam on this mighty river, has to face a typical tail end syndrome in terms of water management, as it has to absorb and adjust with the releases from the upstream major dams like Omkareshwar and Indira Sagar.
Almost 97% catchment of the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) lies in the state of Madhya Pradesh. Entire stretch of river Narmada from Amarkantak to Sardar Sarovar Project (1,163 km) was subjected to heavy rains during last one fortnight. Analysis of rainfall in Narmada basin was showing 7.4% deficit on August 16, 2020, and having 18.6% excess rainfall as on August 31, 2020.
Huge amount of water volume was received at Indira Sagar project (the largest dam in the basin), between August 20 and September 1, 2020 -- 14,660 million cubic metre of water as against the live storage capacity of Indira Sagar Project (ISP) of 9,745 million cubic metre, more than 80% of which was already filled at the beginning of this spell.
Major dams in the upstream of ISP, namely Bargi and Tawa, were also almost filled up and were not in a position to hold any more water. Consequently, Indira Sagar project continuously received more than 10 to 12 lakh cusecs of inflow, with the maximum inflow of 16.13 lakh cusecs on August 30, 2020 at 06.00 hours.
With ISP also filled up to more than 95% of its capacity, they had no other choice but to release it in the downstream. Same was the case at Omkareshwar which resulted into heavy outflow from Omkareshwar Sagar Project (OSP) and it got further added up due to heavy rains in the intermittent catchment between OSP and SSP. Compound effect of all these resulted into continuous huge inflow into SSP. 
Making use of the state of the art technology and with scientific analysis and coordinated operations of various reservoirs with the help of the Central Water Commission (CWC) and the Narmada Control Authority (NCA), the Sardar Sarovar reservoir was operated in such a way that the spillway discharge could be restricted to less than 10 lakh cusecs for most of the times with a maximum of (peak) to 10.72 lakh cusecs at 14.00 hours on September 1, 2020 (as against the spillway discharge carrying capacity of 30 lakh cusecs). 
Keeping in view the safety of the people in Bharuch city and about 30 villages on the banks of Narmada, spillway discharge was gradually managed, starting from 50,000 cusecs on August 28, 2020 at 18.00 hours to 2.65 lakh cusecs at 23.00 hours and further to 7.6 lakh cusecs at 22.00 hours on August 29, 2020. Every time advance alerts were issued to all the concerned authorities and in turn to the general public.
It is needless to state that flood routing using the available live storage capacity of the dam and keeping adequate cushion to accommodate future storms' run-off expected as per the stochastic hydrological analysis, are nothing but sound engineering principles and practices for operating spillway gates of any major dam.
Putting this into practice efficiently this year, Sardar Sarovar Dam has saved around 30,000 hectares of downstream area from the adverse hit of flood damages. This would be further evident from the fact that on August 28, 2020 at 8 am, the Sardar Sarovar Dam was already filled up 130.85 metre and was having live storage of 3,417 million cubic metre. This means that considering its live storage capacity of 5,760 million cubic metre its balance holding capacity was only 2,343 million cubic metres on that day.
Some well-known anti-dam activists have been attempting to curse Sardar Sarovar Dam and its project authorities by making false allegations
After that during August 28, 2020 to September 3, 2020, more than 10,000 million cubic metres of inflow was received at the Sardar Sarovar Dam which has been safely negotiated through scientifically carried out flood routing and that too without compromising with future flood absorption potential required to be kept on any given date.
Status of all major dams in Narmada basin as on Sepmtember 3, 2020 is as under:  
Some well-known activists who are anti-dam in general and anti-Sardar Sarovar in particular have been still attempting to curse Sardar Sarovar Dam and its project authorities by making false allegations of having created "avoidable flood disaster" (see  "Behind 'avoidable' flood disaster in Narmada from Aug 29 to Sept 1 in South Gujarat", Counterview, September 3, 2020).
Instead of allowing the people in the downstream areas to share their experience of having a great sigh of relief this year amidst very heavy rainfall in the Narmada basin, factually incorrect information is being deliberately disseminated. 
A few classic examples are: 
  1. Till Saturday, August 29, 2020 early hours, they (Sardar Sarovar Dam operators) were not releasing any water from spillway gates of dam (in fact, spillway gate operation was already started at 18.00 hours on August 28, 2020).
  2. In the evening of Tuesday September 1, 2020, they (Sardar Sarovar Dam operators) closed most of the spillway gates, thus reducing releases from spillway to less than a 10th of the earlier figure (in fact, maximum outflow from the Sardar Sarovar Dam was 10.72 lakh cusecs on September 1, 2020 at 14.00 hours which was reduced thereafter to meet with the challenges of full moon [Poonam] on September 2, 2020). 
  3. Sardar Sarovar powerhouses produced peak of 26.91 million units on September 2, 2020, this again shows underutilisation of power station (in fact, operation of the River Bed Power House was started on August 26, 2020 and gradually stepped up to operation of all the six turbines at 10.00 hours on August 30, 2020). 
  4. CWC also provided warning and advisories that Sardar Sarovar Project authorities clearly ignored (in fact, not a single warning or advisory has been ignored. on the contrary the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited has worked in close coordination with CWC, NCA and the authorities of upstream dams in Madhya Pradesh). 
Anyway, good part of even such misinformation campaign is that, staunch opponents of Sardar Sarovar Dam have also started believing that it has the potential to be flood moderator!
---
*KV Sanghavi is retired secretary, Government of Gujarat; JB Patel and Dr VM Yagnik are retired chief engineers, Government of Gujarat; LS Sharma is retired Managing Director, Electronics & Quality Development Centre, Government of India

Comments

Anonymous said…

The Authors of this article are retired bureaucrats and technocrats. How come retired bureaucrats became so active after retirement in order to defend the Sardar Sarovar Dam operation in September, 2020 while they are drawing pension sitting at home?

Notably, there are no proper references to all the data furnished in this article. Which means, the data about the reservoir releases, the time of spillway gate operation, the discharge from Sardar Sarovar Dam, etc.. are all unreliable.

Surprisingly, authors are silent on the Sardar Sarovar rule curve. They should have transparently disclosed the reservoir rule curve/dam operation curve in this article if they are really sincere and honest, so that readers themselves could have judged the genuineness of their story of this article.

Readers and scholars should note that the data related to discharge, reservoir operation rule curve are all hidden from public view. These authors are the same bureaucrats who kept data secret from public gaze during their entire service and now they are writing stories as if they were present during August/September exactly at the time of unfortunate floods downstream of Sardar Sarovar dam. They are retired and sitting at home sipping coffee, where were they on August, 29, 2020, September 1, 2020 etc...is not mentioned!

Readers and scholars should note that Central Water Commission is another unreliable and non-transparent organization when it comes discharge data, flood forecast and dam safety. If you analyze discharge data of Central Water Commission, you will see worst quality of discharge data where there is computed values, NULL data, missing data and these retired bureaucrat authors are deliberately hiding the technically unsound organization called Central Water Commission. For example: Just see the quality of discharge data at Neeleshwaram site belonging to Central Water Commission in Kerala available on SANDRP site. You will vomit immediately on seeing the data quality.

Central Water Commission flood forecast is based on outdated gauge-to-gauge correlation that is 50 years behind the current technology of Ensemble model based forecast. The lead time of this gauge-to-gauge is just 10 -124 hours. Whether the authors of the article know the latest ensemble technology of flood forecast? Only recently, Central Water Commission has began rainfall-runoff hydrological model based forecast. It is not clear what model Central Water Commission used for inflow forecast of Sardar Sarovar? Can these retired bureaucrats able to answer? I am sure the retired Secretary has never once in his life time has done hands on a hydrological model.

Whether the authors who write advance alerts were given to authorities able to say, whether the authorities understood the alerts, what was the lead time of those alerts, whether the lead time was adequate? No answers.

Certainly this article is scientifically useless and has no significance particularly when there is no display of reservoir rule curve of Sardar Sarovar and other upstream dams.


Dam Manager


Anonymous said…

The lead time of this gauge-to-gauge is just 10 -24 hours not 124 hours (Seems typo). 24 hours lead time is the "aukaat" of Central Water Commission. Whereas Ensemble Forecast adopted in USA and UK gives 15 days lead time.
Shashidhar said…
Anonymous bhai, Central Water Commission is a racist/casteist organization with no law and order. Racist people run it like their private company with no transparency and accountability. Authors think readers are naive when they mention Central Water Commission.

Shashi

TRENDING

Did Modi promote Dholavira, a UNESCO site now, as Gujarat CM? Facts don't tally

By Rajiv Shah  As would generally happen, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet – that not only was he “absolutely delighted” with the news of UNESCO tag to Dholavira, but he “ first visited ” the site during his “student days and was mesmerised by the place” – is being doubted by his detractors. None of the two tweets, strangely, even recalls once that it’s a Harappan site in Gujarat.

How real is Mamata challenge to Modi? Preparing for 2024 'khela hobey' moment

By Prof Ujjwal K Chowdhury*  Third time elected West Bengal Chief Minister, Mamata Banerjee is on a whirlwind tour of Delhi, meeting everyone who matters within and beyond the government, the Prime Minister, the President, some Cabinet ministers, Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, several other opposition leaders, et al.

Giant conglomerates 'favoured': Whither tribal rights for jal-jungle-jameen?

Prafull Samantara By Mohammad Irshad Ansari*  The struggle for “Jal, Jungle and Jameen” has been a long-drawn battle for the tribal communities of India. This tussle was once again in the limelight with the proposed diamond mining in the Buxwaha forest of Chhatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). The only difference in this movement was the massive social media support it gained, which actually seems to tilt the scale for the tribal people in a long time.

UP arrest of 'terrorists': Diverting attention from Covid goof-up, Ram temple land scam?

By Advocate Mohammad Shoaib, Sandeep Pandey* That corruption is rampant in police department is a common experience. However, there is another form of corruption which devastates lives of individuals and their families. It has now emerged as a common phenomenon that police more often than not register false cases because of which individuals have to spend number of years in jail.

If not Modi, then who? Why? I (an ordinary citizen) am there! Main hoon naa!

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The number of women ministers is doubled in early July from the first term after cabinet reshuffle by the present government led by Narendra Modi. While there were 06 women ministers in the previous term, this term there are 11. The previous two governments led by Dr Manmohan Singh had 10 women ministers in each tenure. Are these number of women ministers something to rejoice in the near 75 years of independence? Yes maybe, if we think that things are slowly improving in the patriarchal system. This change is less likely to achieve gender balance in the parliament otherwise we require more than 11 as per the 33% reservation . This change is also less likely because the men politicians’ inability to handle the country’s mess is becoming more and more evident and especially during the corona crisis. Seems, the addition of more women ministers may be a result of the recent assembly elections where women played a decisive role in the election results. For example

Ganga world's second most polluted river, Modi's Varanasi tops microplastics pollution

By Rajiv Shah  Will the new report by well-known elite NGO Toxics Link create a ripple in the powerful corridors of Delhi? Titled “Quantitative analysis of microplastics along River Ganga”, forwarded to Counterview, doesn’t just say that Ganga is the second most polluted river in the world, next only to Yangtze (China). It goes ahead to do a comparison of microplastics pollution in three cities shows Varanasi – the Lok Sabha constituency of Prime Minister Narendra Modi – is more polluted compared to Kanpur and Haridwar.

Effluent discharge into deep sea? Modi told to 'reconsider' Rs 2275 crore Gujarat project

Counterview Desk  In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, well-known Gujarat-based environmentalist, Mahesh Pandya of the Paryavaran Mitra, has protested against the manner in with the Gujarat government is continuing with its deep sea effluent disposal project despite environmental concerns.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Khorigaon demolition: People being 'brutally' evicted, cops 'restricting' food, water

By Ishita Chatterjee, Neelesh Kumar, Manju Menon, Vimal Bhai* On July 23, the Faridabad Municipal Corporation told the Supreme Court that they have cleared 74 acres out of 150 acres. Despite the affidavit of the Municipal Corporation, the court, on the complaint of various litigants, that the arrangements for living, food etc. have not been made for the people.