Skip to main content

India's future CJI's 'deafening' silence on ex-CJIs' postings due to political favouritism

By NS Venkataraman*
Justice NV Ramana, who is next in line to become the Chief Justice of India, has said that judges are becoming victims of juicy gossip and slanderous social media posts. He was speaking at the launch of the book, ‘Judiciary, Judges and the Administration of Justice’, written by former Supreme Court judge Justice R Banumathi.
Justice Ramana further said that as judges are self-restrained from speaking out in their own defence, they are now being construed as soft targets for criticism. There is reason why this view of the judge should be read not only with interest but also with understanding.
The job of a judge is an unenviable one. When judgements are delivered, certainly one party would be the loser and the other party would be the winner. It is possible that both parties have a strong case from one point of view or the other. Judgement has to be delivered not only based on the prevailing law but also combining it with an element of perspective and such perspective may differ from one judge to another. This is an inevitable problem.
The judicial system recognizes this aspect and that is why appeals are permitted against the judgement of lower court to the higher court and more than one judge sits to hear the cases on several occasions , when majority judgement would prevail.
Further, there are also issues such as judges admitting some cases for hearing and dismissing some cases even at the first instance itself, which leave the losing party unhappy.
Judges are, sometimes, criticized for overreach by entertaining cases which come under the legitimate ambient of the ruling government and where the judiciary has no business to interfere. This, of course, involves an element of judgement based on the perspective of the judge. Nevertheless, there is considerable criticism too frequently heard these days about the judiciary overreach.
Today, since the credibility of the politicians and bureaucrats is low and people are tired about the extent of prevalence of corruption and nepotism in the government machinery at various levels, people have come to look upon the judiciary as the ultimate be all and end all of justice system in the country and expect the judges to undo the wrongs committed by government or non-government establishments.
In such conditions, people expect a very high standard of probity amongst the judges and they vent their anger and frustration, when some judges may fail to meet the expected standard from the people. 
People are certainly surprised that former senior judges have thought it fit to accept jobs offered by the government after their retirement
With social media becoming a strong and effective forum for people, criticism against the judges are becoming frequent and sometimes too harsh and severe. It is possible that most of such criticisms may be without adequate knowledge of the facts and with inadequate understanding of the nuances of law.
When such criticisms are made, judges are unable to counter such criticisms in view of the positions held by them. This is the reason for the anguish of Justice NV Ramana and the critical observations made by him.
While it is inevitable that the judgements could be subjected to different interpretations, fortunately judgements are implicitly obeyed without defiance, which is a healthy sign and reinforces the fact that, by and large, people still repose faith in the judiciary.
While judges have a strong case for voicing anguish about criticisms voiced from time to time, they have to agree that some of the judges have indulged in corrupt practices, got postings due to political favouritism, and some judges have also been punished for such unethical practices.
The recent incidents of a former Chief Justice of India accepting the post of governor of a state and another former Chief Justice of India accepting his nomination for membership of Rajya Sabha immediately after retirement have sent wrong signals and have considerably affected the overall image of judiciary itself.
In such circumstances, people cannot be blamed if they would start wondering whether judgements delivered by these senior judges in their pre-retirement stage could have been done as a matter of quid pro quo.
While one may not be surprised that politicians in power have offered the prestigious positions to the former judges, people are certainly surprised that these former senior judges have thought it fit to accept such jobs offered by the government after their retirement.
While Justice NV Ramana has expressed his anguish about the judges being criticized, his deafening silence about the behaviour of some of the judges cannot but be noted by people.
Judges are expected to be persons of truth and they need to be persons with care also. They should not only be honest and truthful throughout their professional life and after retirement but also appear to be so.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Ganga world's second most polluted river, Modi's Varanasi tops microplastics pollution

By Rajiv Shah  Will the new report by well-known elite NGO Toxics Link create a ripple in the powerful corridors of Delhi? Titled “Quantitative analysis of microplastics along River Ganga”, forwarded to Counterview, doesn’t just say that Ganga is the second most polluted river in the world, next only to Yangtze (China). It goes ahead to do a comparison of microplastics pollution in three cities shows Varanasi – the Lok Sabha constituency of Prime Minister Narendra Modi – is more polluted compared to Kanpur and Haridwar.

How real is Mamata challenge to Modi? Preparing for 2024 'khela hobey' moment

By Prof Ujjwal K Chowdhury*  Third time elected West Bengal Chief Minister, Mamata Banerjee is on a whirlwind tour of Delhi, meeting everyone who matters within and beyond the government, the Prime Minister, the President, some Cabinet ministers, Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, several other opposition leaders, et al.

Did Modi promote Dholavira, a UNESCO site now, as Gujarat CM? Facts don't tally

By Rajiv Shah  As would generally happen, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet – that not only was he “absolutely delighted” with the news of UNESCO tag to Dholavira, but he “ first visited ” the site during his “student days and was mesmerised by the place” – is being doubted by his detractors. None of the two tweets, strangely, even recalls once that it’s a Harappan site in Gujarat.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

If not Modi, then who? Why? I (an ordinary citizen) am there! Main hoon naa!

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The number of women ministers is doubled in early July from the first term after cabinet reshuffle by the present government led by Narendra Modi. While there were 06 women ministers in the previous term, this term there are 11. The previous two governments led by Dr Manmohan Singh had 10 women ministers in each tenure. Are these number of women ministers something to rejoice in the near 75 years of independence? Yes maybe, if we think that things are slowly improving in the patriarchal system. This change is less likely to achieve gender balance in the parliament otherwise we require more than 11 as per the 33% reservation . This change is also less likely because the men politicians’ inability to handle the country’s mess is becoming more and more evident and especially during the corona crisis. Seems, the addition of more women ministers may be a result of the recent assembly elections where women played a decisive role in the election results. For example

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

UP arrest of 'terrorists': Diverting attention from Covid goof-up, Ram temple land scam?

By Advocate Mohammad Shoaib, Sandeep Pandey* That corruption is rampant in police department is a common experience. However, there is another form of corruption which devastates lives of individuals and their families. It has now emerged as a common phenomenon that police more often than not register false cases because of which individuals have to spend number of years in jail.

Giant conglomerates 'favoured': Whither tribal rights for jal-jungle-jameen?

Prafull Samantara By Mohammad Irshad Ansari*  The struggle for “Jal, Jungle and Jameen” has been a long-drawn battle for the tribal communities of India. This tussle was once again in the limelight with the proposed diamond mining in the Buxwaha forest of Chhatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). The only difference in this movement was the massive social media support it gained, which actually seems to tilt the scale for the tribal people in a long time.

Effluent discharge into deep sea? Modi told to 'reconsider' Rs 2275 crore Gujarat project

Counterview Desk  In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, well-known Gujarat-based environmentalist, Mahesh Pandya of the Paryavaran Mitra, has protested against the manner in with the Gujarat government is continuing with its deep sea effluent disposal project despite environmental concerns.

Khorigaon demolition: People being 'brutally' evicted, cops 'restricting' food, water

By Ishita Chatterjee, Neelesh Kumar, Manju Menon, Vimal Bhai* On July 23, the Faridabad Municipal Corporation told the Supreme Court that they have cleared 74 acres out of 150 acres. Despite the affidavit of the Municipal Corporation, the court, on the complaint of various litigants, that the arrangements for living, food etc. have not been made for the people.