Skip to main content

Conspiracy of Delhi riots? PUCL objects to 'evidence' from unnamed informant

Counterview Desk

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has asked Delhi police commissioner SN Srivastava to “urgently stop motivated and malicious investigation”, and instead carry out “bona fide” investigation into the violence that shook North-East Delhi on February 23-26, 2020, which took 53 lives and caused injured scores of others. 
Asking him to tell the Crime Branch police station, New Delhi, to “stop filing of charge sheet on the basis of fabricated evidence and false confessions in the conspiracy case made out in FIR number 59/2020”, in a letter to Srivastava, Ravi Kiran Jain, president, and Dr V Suresh, general secretary, PUCL, said, they are, no doubt, aware that it is “a mammoth investigation with over 751 FIRs.
Of these FIRs, 61 FIRs are being investigated by Crime Branch, and 689 FIRs are being investigated at the Police Station level and one by the Special Cell of the Delhi Police.
However, the top human rights organization said, it is more concerned over FIR 59/2020, registered at the Crime Branch Police station and being investigated by the Special Cell, Delhi police, examining the conspiracy angle of the Delhi riots.
Claimed PUCL, this FIR was registered on March 6, 2020, by an officer of the Crime Branch “based solely on ‘information’ by an unnamed informant under very simple sections of the IPC 147/148/149/120B, relating to conspiracy, for unlawful assembly and rioting among others.”
“It is matter of great alarm the manner in which Delhi police is trying to beef up an otherwise hollow foundation and has added charges which include19 IPC Sections -- 120 (B) read with 302, 307, 124 (A), 153 A, 109, 114, 147, 148, 149, 186, 212, 353, 395, 427, 435, 436, 452, 34, and sections 3 and 4 of the PDPP Act, sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act and sections 13, 16, 17, 18 of the UAPA”, It added.
As the charge-sheet in this matter is to be filed before September 17, 2020, PUCL said, it decided to draw the police commissioner’s attention to "several concerns" regarding the investigation under FIR 59/20, and seek his "urgent intervention and assurances".

Excerpts from PUCL concerns:

1. False theory of conspiracy by all those who were part of the movement against CAA: 

§ The scrutiny of several other charge-sheets that have already been filed in the riots cases, indicates that the Delhi Police is developing a theory of a wide-ranging and deep-rooted conspiracy to cause violence between communities in February 2020, allegedly to destabilize India and ruin its international image. It is alleged that the planning into this violence preceded even the passage of the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAA), on December 11, 2020. 
The entire democratic movement against the CAA, which many legal experts in India and outside and Special Rapporteurs of UN have opined is unjust, unconstitutional and against India’s obligations under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is sought to be criminalised and is being projected as the front for this conspiracy.
§ In order to build a foundation of conspiracy and book people under UAPA, chargesheets like the latest Supplementary charge-sheet in FIR No. 50/2020, Jaffrabad Police station shows the motivated investigation that the Delhi police have indulged in. 
The frequent clubbing of the terms "anti-CAA protestor/rioter" in the chargesheet shows a predetermined mindset of the Delhi police to project every law abiding citizen, who in exercise of their fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression and in the performance of their fundamental duties to defend the country and its Constitution, protested against an unjust law. 
It is a matter of great concern that statements which the persons in police remand denied making, have been made the basis to implicate more law abiding citizens, with the clear motive to target eminent academics and university professors, writers, film makers, civil society activists, political party leaders and also MLAs as being the instigators, mobilisers of road blocks and motivators of dharnas, in order to build a baseless case. 
There is hardly any circumstantial or electronic evidence, to even show any involvement; yet, brazenly such chargesheets implicating people have been filed, to build a larger case of being conspirators of the violence.
The invoking of UAPA is not only an abuse of law but it is in fact trivialising a law which was enacted to deal with serious threats
§ Under this wide ambit, a large number of people continue to be interrogated and arrested, as conspirators and provocateurs. This includes young people from the Muslim community, senior activists, academics, writers, professors, cultural artistes, trade-unionists who supported the anti-CAA protests.
§ The interrogation of more than 60 people under FIR 59/2020, shows a clear line of investigation -- every activity which was part of the peaceful anti-CAA protest is now being made suspect. Even a women's solidarity yatra, wherein a group of women over three days visited a dozen sites, is now suspect. 
Visits to dharna sites to make speeches on the CAA is being looked upon as provocation, discussion on whether a road block should happen or not, which is a strategy used by all protests, is being considered as the gravest criminal offence that could have occurred, more important than the road block itself.
§ A WhatsApp group, the Delhi Protest Solidarity Group (DPSG), comprised of a motley group of people, who were there with a simple objective as citizens to support a people’s movement, is being made out to be some dangerous hub of this alleged criminal conspiracy. Discussions on this group are being taken out of context and being presented as a part of the ‘sinister’ plan to provoke violence.

2. Manufacturing of evidence through custodial interrogations and coerced confessions

§ Twenty people arrested under this FIR were subjected to custodial interrogation, amongst whom, it is reliably learnt, at least 5 were allegedly forced to make confessions. The actual number may be higher. Of these 20 people, 17 persons have been booked under sections 13, 16, 17 and 18 of the UAPA, and remain incarcerated. 
The invoking of UAPA sections is to clearly ensure that those arrested do not get bail for the next five years or more. The invoking of UAPA is not only an abuse of law but it is in fact trivialising a law which was enacted to deal with serious threats and was not meant to crush democratic and constitutionally guaranteed rights.
§ Additionally, over 40 people said they were interrogated. Some young people were repeatedly called, kept till late into the night, and asked to sign on pre-drafted texts of "confessions". Some refused and some succumbed under pressure.
§ In other riots case also, people have reported being coerced during police interrogation. 
§ A scrutiny by independent media found the following:
  • In the Ankit Sharma charge-sheet (FIR 65/20), Dayalpur Police station, presented by the Delhi Police, there were 4 identical ‘confessional’ statements.
  • There were 7 identical statements in the Ratan Lal (FIR 60/20), Dayalpur police station, chargesheet. 
  • And there were 10 identical statements in the Jaffrabad police station, (FIR 50/20) charge-sheet. 
  • In a fourth charge-sheet of the Dilbar Negi case (FIR number 39/20) Thana, Gokulpuri, the Indian Express found that 9 out of 12 confessional statement were near verbatim copies of each other. 
This pattern of coerced statements and false evidence is alarming.
§ We are all aware that confessional statements made in police custody have little evidentiary value in court. Yet, they are being repeatedly leaked to select media, to build a public opinion and allow a media trial. This has already vilified and harmed people like Professor Apoorvanand and Dr Umar Khalid. 
It has also vilified Asif Iqbal Tanha, Meeran Haider, Tahir Hussain, Gulfisha, Natasha Narwal and Devangana Kalita, Khalid Saifi, Sharjeel Imam and others who remain incarcerated. All this is happening despite High Court orders in the Devangana Kalita case asking the police to stop such leaks of information of ongoing investigation. 

3. Shocking nature of biased narrative being presented in several charge-sheets

We draw your attention to the kind of utterly absurd story that has thus far been presented in some of the charge-sheets:
§ The background in several charge-sheets has targeted simple speeches like that of Harsh Mander (a widely respected former senior IAS officer), given to protesting students of Jamia Millia Islamia on December 16, claiming that this speech "behind the facade of peace", provoked unlawful acts and violence, when there is nothing to prove such an allegation.
The frequent clubbing of the terms 'anti-CAA protestor/rioter' in the chargesheet shows a predetermined mindset of the Delhi police
The speech, which actually called for peace, love and non-violence, is in the public domain. It falls within the domain of the right to freedom of speech and expression recognised in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.
§ Several charge-sheets contain elaborate flow charts, alleging entirely fictitious layers of planning, and alleging that this wide range of people who supported the movement against CAA were all part of a well-coordinated conspiracy -- this includes people like film maker Rahul Roy, student activist Kanwalpreet and others from AISA, members of  `Pinjra Tod’, the young women students group from several Universities in Delhi and others from the Delhi based group of activists, called the `United Against Hate’ working for secularism in the country. 
The Delhi police has not even spared DS Bindra, a philanthropist from the Sikh community, who sold a flat to feed people at dharna sites, and Dr Anwar of Al Hind Hospital who deposed over the phone in the midnight hearing in front of a High Court judge, regarding ambulances being prevented from reaching his hospital to take the injured to specialised hospitals in Delhi. These allegations of conspiracy have no basis in fact, or in evidence.
§ There appears to be a race to implicate as many bonafide law abiding citizens into a non-existent conspiracy case in the chargesheet which is to be filed. Clearly this investigation is leading farther and farther away from the real rioters. It appears that it is being carried out solely to spread fear among citizens so as to silence all democratic activities and not for the purpose of bringing the real perpetrators of the violence to book.

4. We urge you to uphold sanctity of due process, conduct a fair and just investigation, as mandated by the law, CrPC and the Delhi Police rules

We appeal to yo to ensure a fair and just investigation into the violence that shook Northeast Delhi in end February, 2020 so that the real perpetrators are brought to book. We look up to you to restore faith in the Delhi Police’s investigation.
We urge the Delhi Police to probe into the matter with the skills and objectivity that it has been trained for, following the constitutional mandates and established procedures of law, and not pursue this malicious line which appears to be politically motivated.
We are constrained to point out that the Delhi police seem to be abdicating its constitutional duty to conduct independent, fair and objective investigation. The fact that the police is not investigating the role played by BJP leaders, like Kapil Mishra and others in actually instigating and promoting the violence, despite so much electronic evidence of speeches, social media posts being available only deepens our concern.
We would like to point out that we are not alone in pointing out to the patently partisan role seemingly played by the Delhi Police. Very senior former police officers, including well known former DGP level officers, eminent and experienced former IAS, IFS and Central Services officers and a large number of citizens, media as well as the Delhi Minorities Commission are asking the same questions.
*** 
We have come to know from media reports that Dr Umar Khalid, a promising young scholar, who believes in the power of Gandhian non-violent, peaceful means for bringing about communal harmony and peace thereby strengthening secularism, was arrested by the Delhi police late last night on September 13, 2020.
It is pertinent to point out that he is a law abiding citizen and that he has always voluntarily appeared before the police whenever summons were issued for his presence. There is no fear of him fleeing justice. This being the case, there is absolutely no legal necessity to justify his arrest. This only underscores our concern about the Delhi police engaging in arbitrary arrest and conducting a partial, biased and politically motivated investigation.
We appeal that a fair and just probe be ensured. That all arbitrary arrests be immediately stopped and all those incarcerated be released. It is important that there is no travesty of justice in investigation and the truth, with evidence, is presented to the courts. 
The smallest tribute that can be paid to the numerous lives lost during the NE Delhi violence is to ensure that the true perpetrators are brought to book. It will also be the biggest demonstration that ultimately it is the rule of law and the Indian Constitution that triumphs in our country.

Comments

TRENDING

What's behind public sector banks showing huge profits in 2nd quarter of 2022-23?

By Thomas Franco*  The quarter two results of the public sector banks (PSBs) appear to be noteworthy compared to a few years ago. All these banks showed good profits in the financial year 2021-22. Twelve PSBs made a net profit of Rs 25,685 crore in quarter 2 of FY23 and a total of Rs 40,991 crore in the first half of 2023. The combined profit of 12 banks in March 2022 was Rs 66,539 crore which was 110% more than 2021 – Rs. 31,816 crore. The Asset Quality Review of 2015 saw a surge in NPAs of PSBs jumping to Rs 8.96 lakh crore in March 2018 from Rs 2.17 lakh crore in March 2014. This was simply because the norms for NPAs were changed from 180 days to 90 days, and all restructuring of even genuine accounts was done away with. In 2018 NPA of SBI was 5.73% which has come down to 0.8% in Q2 of FY23. The NPA of Canara Bank has come down to 2.19% from 7.48% in Mar 2018. The same trend is seen in all public banks. Now SBI has seen a jump of 74% in its net profit, while Canara Bank’s profit is

Economist-editor's allegations on Narmada defamatory, baseless: Medha Patkar

Counterview Desk  In a reply directly addressed to well-known economist, journalist and columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar’s two articles in the Times of India (republished here and here ), calling them defamatory and wondering whether they were borne out of “ignorance or a conspiracy through political alliance”, Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Pakar has said that the Narmada Sardar Saravar Project and the people's movement by adivasis, farmers, labourers, fish workers, potters and all the generations’ old communities from the river valley have suddenly come to be focused on, since the Gujarat elections are in the doorstep. She believes that while the “defamatory accusations with baseless conceptions such as ‘urban naxals’ are to be laughed at as the electoral strategic moves, one gets shocked to read the articles by a known old columnist like Swaminathan Ankalesaria Aiyar, published in a reputed daily like the Times of India." According to her, Aiyar’s two articl

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Business back to normal? IIM-A survey says, sales expectations have sharply improved

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management’s Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES), which polls a panel of business leaders to find out their perception of slack in economy, including their inflation expectations, year-ahead cost expectations and the factors influencing price changes, such as profit and sales levels, etc., has said that the cost perceptions data indicates signs of moderation in price pressures. Carried out for September, the survey says, the cost pressure of the reporting firms has shifted from “very significant increase (over 6%) to moderate increase (3.1% to 6%).” It adds, “The percentage of firms perceiving over 10% cost increase y-o-y has declined. Over 21% of the firms in September 2022 round of the survey perceive that costs have increased very significantly (over 10%) – down from 26% recorded in August 2022.” Claiming to be a unique survey, in that it goes straight to businesses -- the price setters -- rather than to consumers or household

Hindutva groups threat to peace, freedom: US diaspora groups tell FBI, other govt depts

By Our Representative  The Islamophobic and neo-Nazi ideology of Hindutva is a clear and present danger to peace and freedoms in the United States, a coalition of civil rights organizations told key officials of the U.S. Attorney General’s Office, the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) at a recent event in Edison, New Jersey. At the event titled United Against Hate, activists from American Muslims for Democracy (AMD), Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR) and Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) made detailed presentations on this ideology of Hindu supremacism that is committing mass persecution of India’s Muslims and Christians and is rearing its ugly head in New Jersey as well as across the US. Attending the event were David S Leonardis, Special Investigator from the New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety; Michael E Campion, Chief of the Civil Rights Division for the US Attorney General's Office; and Jonathan R Norbut of the U.S. Dep

GoI's productivity linked incentives to corporates 'without independent analysis'

Counterview Desk  Wondering how prudent is the Government of India's (GoI's) Productivity Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme, EAS Sarma, former secretary, GoI, in a representation to Nirmala Sitharaman, Union finance minister, has said it appears to be nothing more than subsidy to the private sector without any responsibility. Giving a specific example against the backdrop of announcement of 50% subsidy covering the project cost of the Vedanta Group's decision to set up a semiconductor fabrication plant in Gujarat, in collaboration with Foxconn, Sarma says, "The total cost of this project is reported to be Rs 1,54,000 crore. 50% of this works out to Rs 77,000 crore." Stating that this creates the impression that the entire subsidy allocation for the semiconductor manufacturing sector would be appropriated by this company, Sarma says, "The Gujarat government did not lag behind in liberally announcing similar incentives for the Vedanta-Foxconn project. It offered 7

As polls approach, electorate 'failing to realise': Gujarat model is in a shambles

By DN Rath*  Gujarat assembly elections, scheduled to be held on 1 and 5 December 2022, is viewed by many as dress rehearsal for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. When the suffering people have been pointing towards redressal of some local issues like absence of cleanliness, sewage problem, shortage of water supply, troubles created by stray cattle, insufficiency of streetlights, etc., it is evident that they are not fully aware that assembly elections are being fought on ideological standpoints and policy decisions. Nor is there the realisation that the state is in a shambles and the much-trumpeted ‘Gujarat model’ of development has proved to be a hoax. Like other states, the people of Gujarat are also back-broken by steep rise in prices to the tune of 400% in last 20 years. It is not that the government cannot control the spurt in prices if it so wants. Apart from the fact that price rise is an inevitability in a capitalist economy, artificial shortage triggered by massive hoarding, b

BJP poll gimmick? Bilkis Bano rape case 'pardon' vs Rajiv assassins' release

By Sandeep Pandey*  Supreme Court has released six convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. This was bound to happen as earlier AG Perarivalan was released in the same case, setting a precedent. Even though four of them are Sri Lankans but a popular Tamil sentiment favoured the release of these convicts which is why Tamil political parties supported this and resolutions were passed by different governments in Tamil Nadu to his effect.  Rajiv Gandhi paid the price of sending Indian Peace Keeping Force to Sri Lanka where it got entangled with Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and eventually the whole operation ended up is a fiasco.  However, most importantly Sonia and Priyanka Gandhi and probably Rahul too do not have any objections to the release of these convicts. In fact, Sonia Gandhi played an important role in getting the death sentence of the only lady among the convicts Nalini commuted to life term through the Tamil Nadu Governor. Priyanka visited Nalini in Vellore Jail and

Amit Shah accused of inciting communal passion: Demand to postpone Gujarat polls

Counterview Desk  In an email representation to the Election Commission of India (ECI), Dr EAS Sarma, former secretary to the Government of India, has objected to the statement reported to have been made by Union home minister Amit Shah, who allegedly justified the 2002 Gujarat riots stating that certain sections of people “taught a lesson” to the rioters. Noting that the statement, if correct, “in effect implies those other than the law enforcement authorities had taken law into their hands”, Sarma says, “Shah's statement needs to be viewed by the ECI in conjunction with the reported fact that it was the Union Home Ministry that cleared the release of the eleven rape convicts in the Bilkis Bano case, directly related to the infamous Godhra incidents in 2002, which triggered the shameful sequence of events that shook the nation's conscience.” According to Sarma, if the statement is true, “I am constrained to draw the inevitable inference that it would have already impacted th