Skip to main content

Adrift and unanchored ambitions: The meandering foreign policy of Hindutva politics under Modi

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
Post-colonial Indian foreign policy, shaped by the internationalist ideals of the anti-colonial struggle, stood firmly against colonialism, militarism, apartheid, neo-colonial economic practices, and imperialist hegemony. The concept of Non-Alignment was first articulated at the United Nations by India and Yugoslavia during the Korean War, signaling a refusal to be drawn into the bipolar politics of the Cold War. This idea soon evolved into the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a global forum in which India played a leading role—championing decolonization, peaceful development, democratisation, and global solidarity.
NAM was never a passive stance of neutrality. Rather, it represented a proactive opposition to colonial and capitalist domination, apartheid, and military alliances. Representing over 55% of the world’s population, the movement promoted a democratic, peaceful world order based on justice and non-alignment. These foundational principles deeply informed Indian foreign policy, combining moral leadership with strategic national interest.
Even after the Cold War, the values of peace, cooperation, and conflict resolution remained cornerstones of Indian diplomacy. NAM continued to advocate for multilateralism and equality, with India emerging as a key voice in defending the interests of the Global South.
However, the rise of Hindutva politics under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has marked a sharp departure from this legacy. Aligning closely with U.S.-led imperialist agendas and embracing a narrow, majoritarian worldview, the current government has eroded India’s strategic autonomy. Modi’s close alliance with the Israeli state and India’s involvement in the U.S.-led Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD)—often seen as an “Asian NATO” to contain China—reflect a shift that has compromised India’s independent foreign policy.
Framed as a "multi-alignment" strategy, these alignments have weakened the foundational principles of India’s foreign policy and diluted the relevance of the Non-Aligned Movement. What once stood for anti-colonial solidarity, peaceful coexistence, and global justice has been replaced by transactional diplomacy driven by short-term geopolitical interests. The foreign policy of Hindutva-led governance appears increasingly opportunistic and morally unmoored, jeopardizing India’s credibility and influence on the global stage.
While no Indian Prime Minister has undertaken as many international trips as Modi, foreign visits alone do not define the effectiveness or values of a country’s diplomacy. Modi’s travels have often prioritized personal branding and spectacle over substantive diplomacy. Far from advancing India’s core interests, they have fostered a personality cult and weakened the country's traditional diplomatic stature—one that was built on principled leadership and global solidarity.
The current trajectory of Indian foreign policy under Hindutva reflects a directionless and incoherent approach, characterized by erratic choices and ideological rigidity. By aligning with imperialist and Zionist regimes, the Modi government has distanced India from its historic role as a leader of the Global South and a champion of oppressed peoples. Nations that once looked to India as a moral and strategic ally now view it with increasing skepticism.
This decline demands a robust response from Indian citizens. The international reputation and foundational interests of the country must not be bartered away to serve American imperialism or neo-colonial European trade interests. Too often, India is seen by Western powers as merely a market—its people reduced to consumers—rather than as equal partners in shaping a fair and just global order.
As Henry Kissinger once remarked, “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.” In this context, the principles of the Non-Aligned Movement remain as relevant as ever. Reviving them is essential to reasserting the independence of Indian foreign policy and promoting a democratic, equitable world order—one not dictated by the imperatives of global capitalism or corporate interests.
India must reclaim its moral compass. An independent, non-aligned foreign policy—rooted in peace, justice, and solidarity—is key to restoring its global standing. The ideal of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (The world is one family), long central to India’s philosophical and civilisational vision, must be revived not merely as rhetoric, but as a guiding principle.
Let the following verse from the Maha Upanishad once again illuminate India’s global outlook:
 "The world is a family
One is a relative, the other is a stranger—say the small-minded.
The entire world is a family—live the magnanimous.
Be detached, be magnanimous,
Lift up your mind and enjoy
The fruit of universal freedom."
In the broader context, our freedoms, peace, prosperity, and security are inherently interconnected. When these values are divided by national interest, religion, race, or ideology, they are ultimately diminished for all. Foreign policy must rise above divisive politics and reflect a commitment to human dignity, justice, and liberation from all forms of inequality, exploitation, and reactionary thought. That is the only truly global and humane path forward.

Comments

TRENDING

‘Act of war on agriculture’: Aruna Rodrigues slams GM crop expansion and regulatory apathy

By Rosamma Thomas*  Expressing appreciation to the Union Agriculture Minister for inviting suggestions from farmers and concerned citizens on the sharp decline in cotton crop productivity, Aruna Rodrigues—lead petitioner in the Supreme Court case ongoing since 2005 that seeks a moratorium on genetically modified (GM) crops—wrote to Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on July 14, 2025, stating that conflicts of interest have infiltrated India’s regulatory system like a spreading cancer, including within the Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR).

Overriding India's constitutional sovereignty? Citizens urge PM to reject WHO IHR amendments

By A Representative   A group of concerned Indian citizens, including medical professionals and activists, has sent an urgent appeal to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, urging him to reject proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) before the ratification deadline of July 19, 2025. 

Wave of disappearances sparks human rights fears for activists in Delhi

By Harsh Thakor*  A philosophy student from Zakir Hussain College, Delhi University, and an activist associated with Nazariya magazine, Rudra, has been reported missing since the morning of July 19, 2025. This disappearance adds to a growing concern among human rights advocates regarding the escalating number of detentions and disappearances of activists in Delhi.

Ecological alarm over pumped storage projects in Western Ghats: Policy analyst writes to PM

By A Representative   In a detailed letter addressed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, energy and climate policy analyst Shankar Sharma has raised grave concerns over the escalating approval and construction of Pumped Storage Projects (PSPs) across India’s ecologically fragile river valleys. He has warned that these projects, if pursued unchecked, could result in irreparable damage to the country’s riverine ecology, biodiversity hotspots, and forest wealth—particularly in the Western Ghats.

Gurdial Singh Paharpuri: A lifetime of revolutionary contribution and unfulfilled aspirations

By Harsh Thakor*  Gurdial Singh Paharpuri, a Central Committee member of the Communist Party Re-Organisation Centre of India (Marxist-Leninist) (CPRCI(ML)), passed away on July 2, marking a significant loss for the Indian Communist Revolutionary movement. For six decades, Singh championed the cause of revolution, leaving an enduring impact through his lifelong dedication to the global proletarian movement. His contributions are considered foundational, laying groundwork for future advancements in revolutionary thought. He is recognized as a key figure among Indian Communist revolutionary leaders who shaped the mass line, and his example is seen as a model for revolutionary communists to follow.

Designing the edge, erasing the river: Sabarmati Riverfront and the dissonance between ecology and planning

By Mansee Bal Bhargava, Parth Patel  Across India, old black-and-white images of the Sabarmati River are often juxtaposed with vibrant photos of the modern Sabarmati Riverfront. This visual contrast is frequently showcased as a model of development, with the Sabarmati Riverfront serving as a blueprint for over a hundred proposed riverfront projects nationwide. These images are used to forge an implicit public consensus on a singular idea of development—shifting from a messy, evolving relationship between land and water to a rigid, one-time design intervention. The notion of regulating the unregulated has been deeply embedded into public consciousness—especially among city makers, planners, and designers. Urban rivers across India are undergoing a dramatic transformation, not only in terms of their land-water composition but in the very way we understand and define them. Here, we focus on one critical aspect of that transformation: the river’s edge.

Civil rights coalition condemns alleged abduction of activist Samrat Singh by Delhi police

By A Representative The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of civil and democratic rights organisations, has strongly condemned what it describes as the illegal abduction of psychologist and social activist Samrat Singh by a team of Delhi Police officials. The incident occurred on the evening of July 12, 2025, at Singh’s residence in Yamunanagar, Haryana.

The Empire strikes inward: Britain’s colonial legacy now targets its own citizens

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak   British colonialism may belong to the past, but the colonial mindset of the ruling elite in Britain persists. Today, these elites are applying colonial values and repressive political tactics not abroad, but to their own people. 'Home' is now where British colonialism is taking root—threatening civil liberties and undermining liberal democracy. The criminalisation of dissent has become a shared political practice across the Conservative and Labour leadership.

Historic Supreme Court ruling grants tribal women equal right to inherit property

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The Supreme Court of India has delivered a landmark judgment declaring that denying tribal women inheritance rights solely based on gender is unconstitutional. The court affirmed their equal right to ancestral property, stating that refusing a share in such property to a tribal woman or her legal heirs on the basis of sex is both unjust and unconstitutional.