Skip to main content

Why I refused to be part of Rahul Gandhi's 'tryst' with civil society on Bharat Jodo

By Martin Macwan* 

It is in the context of the current discussion and organizing of the Bharat Jodo Yatra under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi that I write this. I sense from the social media an upturn of delight and a sense of welcome of the idea from certain quarters of intellectuals and educators. I am not averse to the idea.
A month ago, we had started our yatra, Bhim Rudan, with a large brass coin and the cash donation from the community to the tune of about 20,00,000 and more in the form of one-rupee currency coins. There was nothing that the yatra was seeking from Parliament or the Government of India. Rather, it wanted to give the coin and the donation of the common people to strengthen its resolve to abolish untouchability de facto.
It’s a history now how the yatra was prevented from moving ahead on Haryana border with unimaginable strength of armed police force under the direct order from the Ministry of Home affairs.
It took us almost two years to give final shape to the yatra involving several hundred people across various states of India, with many more people joining us en route; the first programme of this campaign was organized in 2017.
The yatra was successful in terms of drawing national attention, thanks to the media and social media, towards the question of persisting untouchability practices. The sad demise of  nine-year-old Dalit boy Indra Meghwal, in the week following the yatra, sparked a fierce protest across the country on untouchability. 
The yatra had covered a distance of about 1000 km in Rajasthan in four days with never-before-seen response from the common people. When the yatra was planned there was skepticism all over: ‘Where is untouchability now?’
What has pained me most is complete silence from the civil society on the yatra even after it drew huge media attention. I believe, the silence was on the issue of untouchability. Gujarat, more than any other state, is full of NGO and civil society organizations with their claims on Dalit upliftment, and yet they maintained silence.
I do not remember receiving a single call, except one, to inquire about the yatra. Is it the fear of losing funds under Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), or is it their hypocritical commitment to the cause of untouchability removal that is keeping them at bay, I wonder.
A few months ago, the issue of Gandhi Ashram renovation and the apprehension of state-sponsored destruction of history and the spirit of Gandhiji and his struggle for Independence was raised, and even a yatra was organized from Maharashtra to Gujarat.
My Gandhian friends called me to inform me that they had added me to the group knowing well I stand for such issues. On their request I worked till early morning to write a lengthy article on the subject. It was well received, because I brought in it the perspective of social justice, including abolition of untouchability, that Gandhiji weaved along the struggle for national Independence.
A few weeks later, when we planned our small agitation demanding removal of the Manu statue from the Rajasthan High Court premises, I found all Gandhian friends, secularists, educators and intellectuals missing.
I had a long email conversation with Gandhian friends from the US cautioning me about the damage this may cause to a few remaining Congress and Congress-supported governments against the rise of the BJP. These people were otherwise warm and friendly to me, as I was among the rarest among Dalit activists who spoke in favour of Gandhiji.
The only person who wrote to me an emotional email was Swami Agnivesh, and it was just four days before his tragic death. He had written to me just before he was to be admitted for a surgery. He had hoped that he would survive the surgery and work along with me to resolve the issue arising out of the Manu statue.
In the aftermath of our yatra, Meira Kumar, former Lok Sabha speaker, came out openly against persisting practices of untouchability. She spoke of her bitter memories of how her father Babu Jagjivan Ram, former deputy Prime Minister, faced caste humiliation for being a Dalit.
I remember the days of the several prep-coms leading to the UN world conference against racism held in Durban in 2001. In one such prep-com held in Tehran, ironically, it was Meira Kumari who led the protest against us on behalf of the Indian government for bringing the caste issue to the world platform. She was not ready then to admit the humiliation that her father had suffered even as the deputy Prime Minister of India.
Our yatra convinced me that the epic struggle of removing untouchability remains the call of Dalits alone
The Indian government, I recall, formed a group of seven Members of Parliament, all Dalits, to oppose us. We succeeded ultimately to include the issue of discrimination based on caste on the agenda of the conference. The government delegation was assisted by some Dalit activists and legal luminaries such as Soli Sorabjee.
True, we too on our side had four ex and current members of Parliament, including Prakash Ambedkar, Ramdas Athwale, Dalit Ezhimalai and Pravin Rashtrapal. While the government delegation stayed in starred hotels, we with little resources stayed in an old school building free of cost and bought second hand utensils to cook our own food.
I did receive an email invite in the names of prominent leaders of civil society to attend the meeting of the proposed Bharat Jodo Yatra, where Rahul Gandhi would interact with civil society leaders. I respectfully declined the invite. I could not stop short of letting my reasons known in the letter. 
I failed to understand how the issue of untouchability was unconnected with the idea of Bharat Jodo. If the Congress government in Rajasthan had no courage to remove a statue from High Court premises which was installed after 26 years of Indian Independence, I wonder, what is the difference between the Congress and the BJP?
I did not expect from Gujarat intellectuals-educators-secularists-civil society leaders-NGO sleuths to physically participate our yatra. They neither donated a one-rupee coin, nor did they write even one post on social media in support of the yatra. My emails and letters to many of these so-called friends and colleagues have not received even an acknowledgement.
The yatra was successful thanks to the support of the most common people, and from people with whom I had little interaction over past few years, those who, in any case, never steal the limelight.
Dr BR Ambedkar, Gandhiji and the pre-Independence generation leaders focused on untouchability removal along with the issue of national Independence. How and why would common persons join the struggle for Independence, if it did not offer even slightest hope to protect their interests?
Applying the same logic to the Bharat Jodo Yatra, in spite of the fact that it is a noble objective, why would Dalits be attracted to it when the people associated with such yatras keep mum to the struggles the Dalits or the Adivasis face in their daily lives.
The Congress was instrumental in bringing about the most revolutionary land reform legislations in independent India in the form of Land Ceiling Act the Tenancy Act. However, in Gujarat the community which benefitted the most from such land reforms was Patidar. A transfer of 3.75 million acres of land in Patidar favour, thanks to the courageous first Congress and Gandhian Chief Minster, Uchchhrangrai Dhebar, ensured Patidar dominance in economic and political spectrum of Gujarat.
An equal amount of land was awaiting transfer to Dalits and Adivasis of the Gujarat part of the Greater Bombay State that was soon to be reorganized as Gujarat. Unfortunately, the Congress political leadership was less than enthusiastic about this. There is reason to understand why Dalits were forced to cling to ‘reservation’ as the sole constitutional protection and the bitterness of Dr Ambedkar towards both Gandhiji and the Congress.
As I remember, the receipt of non-support of the intellectuals in the times of the Durban conference was on semantics and pseudo ideological grounds: caste is not race. Today, in the context of our yatra against untouchability, the silence is complete. The yatra has convinced me that, at the end of the day, the epic struggle of removing untouchability remains the call of the Dalits alone.
After all, what would India’s general population gain with annihilation of caste?
*Founder, Navsarjan Trust and Dalit Shakti Kendra, Gujarat; recipient, Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Award, 2000


Dr. Ingole K. S said…
Thank you, I support you and ready to participate whenever you need. जय भीम


Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Union budget 'mum' on relief to marginalised communities facing climate change impact

Counterview Desk  ActionAid, an international advocacy group which claims to work for a world without poverty, patriarchy and injustice, has wondered if the Union budget 2023-24, which is being acclaimed for providing succour to the middle classes, has anything to offer to the India's poor. In a statement, it said, while the budget may have "prioritised inclusive development", the financial outlay for ensuring it "does not show the zeal as hoped." Stating that the Finance Minister said Rs 35,000 crore revenue would have to be "forgone" due to a reduction in personal income taxes, "fiscal prudence is not enough to expand public employment, social security, welfare, education and health expenditures considerably." "The need of the hour is to raise revenues through the reduction of revenues forgone and innovative mechanisms such as wealth tax on super accumulation of wealth", it added. Text: The Union Budget 2023 has given significant

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Why no information with Assam state agency about female rhino poaching for a year?

By Nava Thakuria   According to official claims, incidents of poaching related to rhinoceros in various forest reserves of Assam in northeast India have decreased drastically. Brutal laws against the poachers, strengthening of ground staff inside the protected forest areas and increasing public awareness in the fringe localities of national parks and wildlife sanctuaries across the State are the reasons cited for positively impacting the mission to save the one-horned rhinos. Officials records suggest, only two rhinos were poached in Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve since 1 January 2021 till date. The last incident took place probably in the last week of December 2021, as a decomposed carcass of a fully-grown (around 30 years old) female rhino was recovered inside the world-famous forest reserve next month. As the precious horn was missing, for which the gigantic animal was apparently hunted down, it could not be a natural death. Ironically, however, it was not confirmed when

Civil rights leaders allege corporate loot of resources, suppression of democratic rights

By Our Representative  Civil rights activists have alleged, quoting top intelligence officers as also multiple international forensic reports, that recent developments with regard to the Bhima Koregaon and the Citizenship Amendment Act-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) cases suggest, there was "no connection between the Elgaar Parishad event and the Bhima Koregaon violence." Activists of the Campaign Against State Repression (CASR) told a media event at the HKS Surjeet Bhawan, New Delhi, that, despite this, several political prisoners continue to be behind bars on being accused under the anti-terror the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Addressed by family members of the political prisoners, academics, as well as social activists, it was highlighted how cases were sought to be fabricated against progressive individuals, democratic activists and intellectuals, who spoke out against "corporate loot of Indian resources, suppression of basic democratic

Kerala natural rubber producers 'squeezed', attend to their plight: Govt of India told

By Rosamma Thomas   Babu Joseph, general secretary of the National Federation of Rubber Producers Societies (NFRPS) at a recent discussion at Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, explained that it is high time the Union government paid greater heed to the troubles plaguing the rubber production sector in India – rubber is a strategic product, important for the military establishment and for industry, since natural rubber is still used in the manufacture of tyres for large vehicles and aeroplanes. Synthetic rubber is now quite widespread, but styrene, which is used in making synthetic rubber and plastics, and also butadiene, another major constituent of synthetic rubber, are both hazardous. Prolonged exposure to these even in recycled rubber can cause neurological damage. Kerala produces the bulk of India’s natural rubber. In 2019-20, Kerala’s share in the national production of rubber was over 74%. Over 20% of the gross cropped area in the state is under rubber cultivation, with total

New rules to make lakhs of tribals vulnerable to summary eviction: NAPM tells MPs

Counterview Desk  The top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), has said that the new Forest (Conservation) Rules 2022, pending in Parliament and may be passed any day in the current Budget session, needs to be “strongly opposed” in Parliament. These Rules will allow easy diversion of forest land for projects and companies without the consent of gram sabhas and will allow the eviction of forest communities without the recognition of forest rights”, it alleged.

Lack of welfare schemes, BSF curbs force West Bengal farmers to migrate far away

Counteview Desk  In a representation to the National Human Rights Commission chairperson, a senior West Bengal based activist has complained that villagers living near the border with Bangladesh are forced to migrate to as far away as Mumbai and Kerala because of lack of government sensitivity towards their welfare in original villages. Giving specific instances, Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), said, if the Border Security Force (BSF) had not put any restriction on agricultural activities, and if villages had properly implemented welfare schemes, these people would never migrate to other States. Text: I want to attract your immediate attention to the inhumane condition of the migrated workers of Gobra village, Swarupnagar Block in North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal to seek your urgent intervention to protect the rights of these people. Gobra is a village situated near the Indo-Bangladesh Border where the border fencing is about 500 meters i

FSSAI 'refusing to empower' citizens to have their right to informed choice on GMO

Counterview Desk  The advocacy group Coalition for a GM-Free India in response to Food Safety and Standards Authority of India's FSSAI’s) “weak forms” for licensing of GM foods, has insisted on the need to have “strong regulations to ensure safe food for citizens”. Stating that this form is different from the FSSAI GM draft regulation which had come out recently for which it had shared its response, the NGO network said in letter to Pushp Vanam, joint director, Science and Standards, FSSAI, it is problematic that these forms were not shared at the same time as the GM regulation draft as it would have enabled more people who read and respond to it. Text: This is in regards to the notification from FSSAI asking for inputs on the forms. We find it problematic that these forms were not shared at the same time as the GM Regulation draft as it would have enabled more people who read and responded on the regulation draft to have been able to comment on the forms too. Our response to the