Skip to main content

Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav: Independence is for elite political leaders and corporates

By Harasankar Adhikari 

The TMC-led government of West Bengal is in power for a 3rd term of another 5 years with an absolute single majority. This populist government has implemented several populist programmes for the people rather than supporters of this party. It publicises that Ms. Mamata Banerjee is the symbol of honesty and she has devoted herself to the better living of people or cadres of her party. Dole-based development and corruption are in parallel. Leaders of different hierarchies are involved in rampant corruption or day-night corruption. Corruption has been diversified from tarpaulin, ration to school jobs, coal scams, cattle scams, and so forth. The cut-money from developmental allocation has been officially recognised in an open meeting.
Opponents have been shouting against it. But the TMC party ignores it as politics. Then, Public Litigation Interest moves to the honourable High Court of Calcutta and several orders for investigations into the cases of scams are made to the ED and CBI. Both these central agencies are accordingly running investigations and some of the leaders are suspected, arrested and under custody.
It is obvious because these people have significantly looted public money and cultivated a culture of corruption in West Bengal. TMC cadres are agitating against it because these agencies are purposely used for political purposes by the BJP. But the leaders and cadres of TMC make no effort to probe their honesty. They have made enormous wealth during this tenure of 10 years. Most of them are not from noble families or they left their very highly paid jobs before that. They use the administration as an instrument of corruption deliberately.
Democratic service to the people of Bengal is also an instrument to ensure the self-prosperity of the leaders of TMC. Their strategies for people’s development and prosperity lie within the limits of their dole. Their abusive power mode makes people deaf and dumb. A culture of fear is prominently inculcated in the state. At a recent public meeting near Kolkata (Behala), Ms. Mamata Banerjee asked her supporters to create chaos when she would be interrogated. It demonstrates that she is being investigated by the ED and the CBI. She has made no effort to cleanse herself and her party's cadres of any dishonesty or corruption. She clearly indicated that corruption is the right of her cadres when she is in power. She reveals her dual character of crying for people and supporting the cadres to carry on corruption. She is with her cadres for the vote.
Every Indian celebrated Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav on the eve of completing 75 years of independence with a tricolour flag in each household. But unfortunately, this freedom or independence is for whom? It is for the political leaders in rule or opposition because both categories follow the same line when either one is in rule. This independence is for the political leaders to be free to lie, be corrupted, make wealth, enjoy power, and threaten the people who voted for them. This independence for them is to do whatever they like. But the common mass, even intellectuals or activists, has no right to talk against government policies. They would be punished with incarceration and even death in this democratic country.
At the Lal Quila (Red Fort), the Prime Minister would promise 5 to 7 determinations for a strong, self-sufficient nation (Atmanirvar Bharat), where one-third of the population would remain hungry, ill-healthed, and in other serious crises. For instance, unemployment is a problem for the unemployed, no matter how it is connected with the government.
The colonial rule was by foreigners. But in independent India, the rule is by the own people, elected by the suffering. This independence is for elite political leaders and corporates. The leader will patronise in order to enrich the corporate. The colonial rules snatched wealth for their own country. In independent India, the elite keeps wealth in foreign custody.
When would this type of discrepancy stop? When will Indians enjoy real freedom? Is it not the political leaders that have become a burden to this nation?



'Wedding of the century': What does Mukesh Ambani want to prove by such extravaganza?

By NS Venkataraman*  Mukesh  Ambani,   a renowned Indian industrialist who is said to be the richest person in India and  one of the richest persons in the world,   has just now conducted the wedding celebration of  his son in Mumbai,   with unheard level of lavishness in India.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

'Modi govt's assault on dissent': Foreign funds of top finance NGO blocked

By Rajiv Shah  In a surprise move, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, has cancelled the foreign funding license of the well-known advocacy group, Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA), known for critically examining India's finance and banking sectors from human rights and environmental angle.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'28% rise in sedition cases': Top global NGO alliance rates India's civil space 'repressed'

By Rajiv Shah Rating India's civic space as repressed , Civicus, a global civil society alliance, in its new report submitted to the UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) on the state of civic space in the country has said that the use of sedition law against the Modi government’s critics continues. "Under the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sedition cases have increased by 28 per cent with over 500 cases against more than 7,000 people", it says.

How US is using Tibetans to provoke conflict with China 'ignoring' India

By Lobsang Tenzin*  On July 12, US President Joe Biden signed the Resolve Tibet Act, and Tibetans cheered for it, believing that the law promotes a resolution of the dispute between Tibet and China. Is this true? First, let's look at the issue of the ownership of Tibet. 

Tribals from 60 villages observe seed festival to 'protect' diversity of indigenous seeds

By Bharat Dogra*  Nearly sixty villagers are sitting on an open floor covered by a roof for shade but otherwise open on all sides. Women and men are present in equal numbers but the visibility of women is higher because of their colorful dresses.

Over 3.8 billion animals at risk: India on crossroad in animal welfare practices

By Rupali Soni*  In a collaborative effort, the India Animal Fund and Dasra have unveiled their report , "Our Shared Future | Securing Animal Welfare, Human Wellbeing, and Sustainability in India." This landscape report provides a thorough overview of animal welfare and underscores its indispensable role within India's socio-economic and ecological frameworks. It also illustrates how animal welfare is intricately intertwined with public health, labor welfare, and climate resilience.

Maharashtra govt's proposed bill may be used against 'dissenting' journalists, writers, filmmakers, artists

Counterview Desk  The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Maharashtra, strongly objecting to what it calls “repressive and unconstitutional” Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024, has demanded the proposed law be scrapped in its entirety. In its Statement of Objects and Reasons for the Bill, PUCL noted,  the broad and non-descript label of ‘urban naxal’ has been used, which is actually a “common slur used for any citizen who expresses their opposition to state policy or is not aligned with right-wing majoritarian views."