Skip to main content

India slips to become 15th worst country for Christians to live; it ranked 31st four years ago: US non-profit Open Doors

By Rajiv Shah
Open Doors USA, an American non-profit organization, has triggered Hornet's nest by ranking India 15th, next to Saudi Arabia (14th), among 50 top countries where Christians allegedly face "most severe persecution for their faith". Blaming the "persecution" on BJP led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it says, "As a result, radical Hinduism, which was already present under the previous government, has increased steadily."
According to the study, "While the level of intolerance continues to increase, Christians are regularly attacked by radical Hindus", adding, "The level of impunity has gone up markedly, with communities of converts to Christianity from Hinduism bearing the brunt of the persecution... They are constantly under pressure to return to their old beliefs, and are often physically assaulted, sometimes killed."
Significantly, Open Doors ranked India far better -- 31st -- four years ago. Ranking North Korea No 1 in persecution of Christians, 16th year in a row, calling it the "worst place for Christians to live", the study says, "In this totalitarian communist state, Christians are forced to hide their faith completely from government authorities, neighbours and often, even their own spouses and children."
Other countries ranking worse than India are all under Islamic regimes, including Pakistan, which ranks a high 4th.In Pakistan, the study says, Christians there not just face "close scrutiny and suffer frequent attacks", they are "targets for murder, bombings, abduction of women, rape, forced marriages and eviction from home and country."
All other India's neighbours, however, are found to be ranking far better than India: Bangladesh 26th, Myanmar 28th, Bhutan 30th, China 39th, and Sri Lanka 45th.
Calling India a "Hindu nation", the study cites a report by Sarah Callighan to prove why India has slipped. Especially referring to the RSS, Callighan says, if the saffron organization "has its way, India will soon be unified under one religion, one culture, and one language."
Pointing out that for this to happen, "all other religious communities –- including Christians –- would have to be eliminated",the report says, "According to the RSS organization’s founder, M.S. Golwalker, that is exactly the plan: 'The non-Hindu people in Hindustan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and revere Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but the glorification of the Hindu religion...'"
It adds, "The first quarter of 2017 saw 248 persecution incidents wherein Christians were harassed, threatened or attacked for their faith. More recent records indicate the number of incidents in first six months of 2017 is now up to 410 incidents. This represents an enormous increase in persecution as there were only 441 incidents reported in 2016 for the entire year."
Noting that "these attacks can often be brutal", the report says, "In addition to beatings, there were also 37 incidents where Christians were socially boycotted. Others, according to 34 incident reports, were forced to leave their homes. Amongst these 34 cases, 14 of the incidents forced Christians to leave their village or cities entirely."

Comments

Anonymous said…
The biggest number of persons killed were Hindus by Islamic invasions. British era persecution continued for Sikhs and Hindus including Bengaluru famine and Jallianwalla massacre among others. Indian states have a federal structure when it comes to law and order. Surprising such poor ranking when neighbouring countries seem to have fat worse records. The correct measured will not be individual incidents. It has to be per 10000 population. The rankings will change dramatically in the right context.
Uma Sheth said…
Mr. Anonymous needs to get his facts and his analysis right:
1. there was a Bengal famine but never a Bengaluru famine and the British are certainly to be blamed for it but it affected everyone, mainly the poor, not just Hindus.
2. when India, as it was then, was invaded there were only Hindus living here and the invaders succeeded because there was no unity amongst the innumerable tiny kingdoms - in fact, they betrayed each other all the time instead of uniting and fighting as one, which brings me to my third point:
3. Hinduism is not and never has been a monolithic entity and for the Hindutva brigade to hammer out a single religion is going to be impossible unless, after they have killed or driven away all non-Hindus, the various sects and classes (Dalits, specially) start killing each other till the strongest remains.
Anonymous said…
Onice the marginalised minorities are eliminated (
It will never happen) Hindu will fight amongst themselves. They are still divided. Hate toward Minorities and Dalits are uniting them.Let the RSS shun the hate and see how many listen.
Another pathetic hatchet job by one of those numerous anonymous Christian evangelical hit men spawned by numerous illegitimate evangelical organisations seeking to harvest souls in India. You will be exposed for what you are...Predatory Proselytisers.
Shefali said…
Accusing & abusing without any rationality goes nowhere. What msSeth has said contains arguments which need to be answered before shouting loud

TRENDING

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Would those charged for illegally demolishing Babri now manage a new Ram temple?

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
The long-awaited verdict on the contentious issue of the disputed land in Ayodhya was finally delivered by the Supreme Court on November 9, 2019. The judgement has come after a 70-year-old conflict filled with acrimony, divisiveness, hate and violence between sections of the Hindus and Muslims of the country. At the core of the issue was the Ram Mandir – Babri Masjid dispute: was there a temple on the place where the Masjid was built? To whom should the land be given to?