Skip to main content

Top corporate house Essar "acquires" land in a midnight swoop: "Result" of Central confusion on land acquisition law

By A Representative
Taking advantage of the utter confusion prevailing at the top policy level on the Land Acquisition Act (LAA), 2013, for which an amendment ordinance was floated for the third time by the Government of India May this year, top industrial house, Essar Power, is alleged to have "forcibly" acquired land it had sought for a coal corridor it is constructing from a nearby jetty to the 1,200 MW power plant at Salaya, Saurashtra region of Gujarat.
The acquisition took place, say sources, following Essar Power receiving official nod for acquiring the land without invoking the consent clause or going in for social impact assessment, which were the most important provisions of the LAA, 2013. The NDA government in Delhi is seeking to remove these provisions through its controversial ordinance.
In a mid-night swoop, say sources, the company “forcibly” took possession of farmers’ and common grazing land in Mota Maanda, Parodia and other nearby villages of Khambalia taluka of Devbhoomi Dwarka district of Saurashtra region. The operation took place between the night of June 30 and July 1. It took place with the help of local armed cops under the direct supervision of the district superintendent of police, the district collector.
Meanwhile, the midnight operation has heated up the political atmosphere, with Congress’ national spokesperson Shaktisinh Gohil saying that this suggests the government and the top corporate house are "hand-in-glow", caring little for farmers’ rights. Local MLAs from Jamnagar and Dwarka Dharmendrasinh (Hakuba) Jadeja, Merambhai Ahir and Raghavjibhai Patel are up in arms, supporting farmers whose land has been lost.
The company it is said, had sought 17,69,986 square metres of land for building the corridor. When the company floated the proposal to acquire land, the price it was officially asked to pay for the land was very low, about the same as the government-assessed rate, jantri, which is generally two or three times lower than the market rate. The district collector took the final decision to allow land acquisition for Essar.
Gohil
Objecting to this, Gohil said, “When Essar proposed the coal corridor, the LAA came into force. Yet, ignoring the LAA’s provisions, which would require consent and social impact assessment, as also four times the amount of the price of the land, and taking advantage of confusion on it at the highest level in Delhi, the state government announced the award”.
“Fertile land around the common grazing land was forcibly taken away from farmers by applying the already abrogated 1984 land acquisition law. The matter is currently pending before the Gujarat High Court, which has ordered a stay on government action on the ground that the land cannot be acquired without consent of concerned farmer”, Gohil said.
In the meantime, fear has come to stalk farmers that Essar Power, which wants to build the corridor to transport coal from a nearby jetty, would additionally pollute the farmlands in the vicinity, with the government failing to ensure an assessment of the destruction caused to the environment.
Putting up a list of demands, Gohil, who is former Opposition leader, said, the Gujarat government must act against the officials who worked in favour of the corporate house by acquiring land under the already dropped colonial era land acquisition law. 
“All common grazing land which Essar has taken should be returned to the farmers, and no land should be taken from the farmers without their consent”, he added in a statement.

Comments

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.