Skip to main content

Forked Tongue and Flexible Factsheet: Was over 12 year Modi rule in Gujarat a byword for probity in public life?

By RK Misra*
In fishing -- as in politics -- nothing is more ungainly than a fisherman pulled into the water by his own catch. Hurling muck from the safety of the shore and making it stick may have brought Narendra Modi to the helm of India in 2014 but the Teflon-coated frying pan is itself on fire today.
His government faces the filth of the Lalit Modi revelations, the bloodied Vyapam scam, and now the Madhya Pradesh Dental and Medical Admission Test taint. 
Oscillating between maladministrative misdemeanour and crass corruption charges are veteran minister Sushma Swaraj, Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhararaje Scindia, MP chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan, and Maharashtra minister Pankaja Munde. After ’pehle’ AAP law minister Jitender Singh Tomar landed in the ‘cooler’ over his qualifications,union HRD minister Smriti Irani is next in line for a judicial scrutiny of her venerable CV.
Meanwhile, Modi’s anti-corruption plank is in tatters and the school boyish line, one for joy is fast giving way to two for sorrow,three for pain and now four for anguish with five for agony in the pipeline.
While Manmohan Singh ruled for good of ten years before shit hit the ceiling, just 435 days in the saddle, Modi now mired in similar slime, is resorting to the same golden silence that he mocked his predecessor for.Those who have a felicity with words, often find themselves hoisted with their own petard by the very sentences they hurl with gay abandon when aiming for power.
“I neither aid nor abet corruption”, (main na khata hun na khane deta hun) went the punchline of posters carrying large pictures of the Gujarat chief minister put up during the 2007 Gujarat Vidhan Sabha elections. On March 22,2011 writing in his own blog Modi said ,”On the one side it is being said that the indian government is completely corrupt;then there are reports by America and Wikileaks which refer to the state of Gujarat where the leader is un-corruptible”.So said Modi speaking in self-praise. That the Wikileaks reference to the Gujarat leader stands disputed is a different matter though.
In politics, personal ‘hygiene’ and public ‘sanitation’ may look apart but are closely inter-linked. Was the over twelve year Modi rule in Gujarat a byword for probity in public life? How clean was the Modi ministry in the state? Let's see.
Purshottam Solanki, the fisheries minister and a powerful koli leader, indicted on crass corruption charges, enjoyed a charmed existence as long as Modi ruled Gujarat. Indicted by the Gujarat High Court in a Rs 400 crore fishing contracts scam, he nevertheless continued in office regardless. Solanki gave away fishing contracts for 58 reservoirs in the state each spread over atleast 200 hectares at rates far below the upset price in the previous contract.
The bids worth Rs 40 crore per annum were awarded for a meager Rs 2.36 crore and for ten years! You have to be blind as a bat if you can’t see the corrupt practice.In September 2008 petitioners knocked the doors of the High Court alleging corruption by the minister as well as violation of the process of tendering. In November 2008, a two judge bench of justice Doshit and Sharad Dave ruled that the contracts were wrongly awarded for ‘extraneous reasons’ and ordered re-tendering.
As the order clearly established irregularities by the minister ,the petitioner pressed for his prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act. After dilly-dallying for long ,the Modi cabinet on June 27,2012 refused to prosecute Solanki. The Governor ,meanwhile sanctioned the prosecution and the minister promptly challenged this decision in the High Court with the state government supporting the minister against the Governor.
On September 20, 2012 ,the Gujarat High Court dismissed Solanki’s petition. Solanki and the Gujarat government had made out that in the parliamentary system ,the council of ministers is the real executive ,not the Governor who” had acted contrary to the aid and advice of the council of ministers”. Rejecting this plea Justice Rajesh Shukla ruled that the power exercised by the Governor was not alien to her.
In a stinging indictment of the Modi government which was, in a matter of saying, abetting corruption, the judge ruled” If, in cases where prima facie case is clearly made out, sanction to prosecute high functionaries is refused or withheld ,democracy itself will be at stake. It will lead to a situation where people in power may break the law with impunity, safe in the knowledge they will not be prosecuted as the requisite sanction will not be granted”.
And though the court had asked the governor to decide on the minister’s prosecution, the cabinet did not sanction it until the petitioner moved court against the government including the chief minister for contempt of court proceedings . It was only in July when the court ordered the government to send the report of it’s cabinet meeting with regard to prosecuting Solanki to the governor’s office ,that Modi was forced to act. Subsequently ,the enquiry was handed over to the police which dilly-dallied and then to the Anti-corruption bureau (ACB) which had submitted it’s report to the special ACB court in June 2014.
The second case is that of Babubhai Bokharia ,water resources minister in the Modi government .In June 2013 he was sentenced to three years imprisonment in the Rs 54 crore illegal limestone mining scam of 2006 along with two others .Police had arrested Bokharia from the Porbandar airport in 2007 as he had left the country after the complaint against him and was declared an absconder .The High Court had later released him on bail.
In 2012 he had contested the elections on a BJP ticket after defeating Congress leader Arjun Modvadia and was made cabinet minister by Modi. He continued to remain a minister in the Modi cabinet even after his conviction and sentence and does so to this day .The conviction was subsequently overturned in November 2014.This is besides the well known case of minister of state for Home Amit Shah who quit the government after the CBI booked him in connection with the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case and spent an extended period in prison.
Out on bail, Shah, a close confidante of Modi today presides over the destiny of the ruling party in the country while another Modi minister Mayaben Kodnani who quit the cabinet following her arrest in the Naroda Patiya communal killings of 2002 stands sentenced to life imprisonment.
It is this backdrop that explains the continued silence of the Prime Minister and is also indicative of the future line of action .Chief Minister Modi often railed against the CBI as the ‘Congress bureau of investigations’ but as Prime Minister has no compunctions about putting it to use as his own handmaiden .The sequence of Central investigation events over the last one year bear this out. And now the Vyapam scam investigations have also gone to the very same pliable CBI.
A point to ponder, however, is how come that only known Modi opponents within the BJP -- Sushma, Shivraj and Scindia -- and those capable of emerging as challengers find themselves in the eye of the storm. But more about it some other time. For the moment suffices to say that those who have studied the past closely, have a fair idea of the unfolding future for mental signatures always follow a familiar pattern.

Comments

TRENDING

Hindus to be 'sent' to Kashmir? Despite Israeli settlements, peace eludes the region

By Anand K Sahay*
Curfew, news and communications blackout, transportation shut-down... News reports from Kashmir are worrying. So are the views relayed through the media, especially television. Old-fashioned repression seems to be consorting comfortably with expressions of concern “for our Kashmiri brethren”. We are looking at Orwell’s 1984 in the making.

Dholera 'inundated': Gujarat govt tries selling low lying area as top smart city site

Counterview Desk
Even as the Dholera Special Investment Region Regional Development Authority (DSIRDA) of the Gujarat government was busy organising a junket for Gujarat-based journalists for the area sought to be sold as an ideal special investment region (SIR) for industrialists, well-known farmers' activist Sagar Rabari has wondered why no investor has so far agreed to put in money in an area situated in Ahmedabad district along the Gulf of Khambhat.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

UN experts object to GoI move to 'reinforce' trend of prosecution, eviction of tribals

Counterview Desk
In a report sent to the Government of India, three United Nations (UN) special rapporteurs, expressing "concerns" over the failure to ensure "adequate" implementation of the India Forest Rights Act (FRA), have regretted that the Government of India has not cared to reply their previous communications on this.

Modi's Gujarati mind? Why govt move to 'sell-off' defence PSUs isn't in national interest

By Sandeep Pandey*
The Standing Committee on Defence, 2017-18, of the 16th Lok Sabha highlights the idea of Buy Indian-IDDM (Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured). The Committee expressed concern over the import content of equipments produced and developed by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance Factories (OFs) and defence Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) because of the dependence it creates for military hardware on foreign suppliers.

As submergence stares Narmada valley, Patkar says: With powerful in throne, we're helpless

Counterview Desk
Well-known anti-dam organization, Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), plans to begin its “Resist Illegal Submergence in Narmada Valley” satyagraha on August 21 at Jantar Mantar, Delhi, amidst news that the situation in the valley is “critical”, with two persons having already died in flood-related incidents in the upstream of the Sardar Sarovar dam.

RTI Act holy cow for Govt of India? Official insists, don't ask why, when, what, where

By Pankti Jog*
The Government of India appears to have begun treating the Right to Information (RTI) Act as a holy cow. Its officials seem to believe that the Act is a sacred law, under which people shouldn't be questioning its functioning. One recalls what Prime Minister Narendra Modi said while addressing an RTI convention in 2015: “Why should government wait for people to ask information, we will have all information out in the domain, we have nothing to hide."

Can't go to court with RTI information, rule Ahmedabad authorities: Kankaria accident

By Pankti Jog*
In a shocking reply to an application filed by me, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) authorities have said that the information provided under the Right to Information (RT) Act should be used in court or in a judicial process. The Act is known to be a major tool that enables citizens to seek certified copies of documents, records from any public authority of state and Central government within 30 days, as per provisions of the Act.

Strategy for united struggle against Hindutva 'fascism': Ideological silence is 'no option'

By Dr Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
Electoral alliance and opportunism of national and regional political parties, neoliberal economic marginalisation and soft secular Hindutva line pandering to Hindu majoritarianism laid the foundation of Hindutva fascism in post-colonial India.

Kashmirisation of India? Ayodhya communal harmony meet: Activists stopped, detained

Counterview Desk
In a joint statement, three civil rights organizations, Rihai Manch, National Alliance of People's Movements and Lok Rajniti Manch, and Socialist Party (India), have taken strong exception to the Uttar Pradesh government taking "preventive" steps against those seeking to hold a meeting on communal harmony at Ayodhya.