Over 150 concerned citizens, academics, former bureaucrats, lawyers, journalists, and activists have strongly opposed the move to link Aadhaar with voter IDs, calling it a grave threat to electoral integrity, democratic participation, and fundamental rights. In a statement endorsed by groups including Rethink Aadhaar, Article 21 Trust, Jan Hastakshep, and individuals like economists Jayati Ghosh, Reetika Khera, and former chief secretary Sharad Behar, the signatories denounced what they describe as the government's coercive push to make Aadhaar submission effectively mandatory for voters.
The controversy stems from the Election Commission of India’s recent directive requiring those who decline to link their Aadhaar with their voter ID to justify their decision in person before the Electoral Registration Officer. Critics argue that this violates the ECI’s 2023 commitment before the Supreme Court that such linkage would be voluntary. The signatories assert that the right to vote must not be contingent upon submission of biometric data or the Aadhaar number, especially when the UIDAI itself does not verify nationality and Aadhaar is given to anyone residing in India for 182 days.
The statement expresses particular concern over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision process ahead of the Bihar elections, warning that inadequate notice and procedural safeguards could disenfranchise vulnerable voters. It highlights previous mass deletions—such as in the 2018 Telangana elections, where over 55 lakh voters were reportedly deleted due to Aadhaar mismatches—as evidence of the systemic exclusion such linkages cause. The failed NERPAP initiative in 2015 is cited as another example of Aadhaar-voter linkage being tried and rejected.
Criticism also centers on the technical and legal flaws of the Aadhaar database. The Comptroller and Auditor General’s 2022 report exposed severe issues such as duplicate and fraudulent Aadhaar numbers, unreliable biometric verification, and lack of nationality confirmation. The statement points out that Aadhaar data is more error-prone than voter IDs, with the risk of wrongful deletions now looming over electoral rolls just as it has plagued welfare schemes like PDS and MGNREGA.
Moreover, the proposal is seen as enabling mass surveillance and political profiling without the protection of a functional data privacy law. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, remains largely unimplemented and, according to the signatories, offers wide-ranging exemptions to the government, increasing the risk of data misuse. The Madras High Court has already raised alarms about the abuse of Aadhaar data in electoral contexts, such as in Puducherry.
Calling the proposal unconstitutional, the signatories argue that it contravenes the Supreme Court’s 2018 judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, which limited Aadhaar’s use to welfare schemes funded through the Consolidated Fund of India. Making voting contingent upon Aadhaar, they claim, undermines citizens’ rights to privacy, equality, and democratic participation.
The statement urges the Election Commission to immediately withdraw the Aadhaar-voter ID linkage proposal. It demands a revision of Form 6B to ensure an explicit, meaningful opt-out choice; reinstatement of robust, door-to-door verification methods; social audits to strengthen voter roll transparency; and the adoption of non-biometric alternatives for identity verification.
“The right to vote is not a privilege granted by the state,” the statement declares. “It is a right that must be protected from coercion, surveillance, and exclusion.” The signatories insist that the Election Commission must fulfill its constitutional obligation to protect electoral rights and not erode them under administrative pressure or technological compulsion.
The statement has been endorsed by a wide cross-section of Indian society including activists, researchers, teachers, retired officials, and citizens from across the country and abroad.
Comments