Skip to main content

Proposed electricity Bill sparks concerns over privatisation, federalism, consumer rights

By Jag Jivan 
The Union government’s newly released Draft Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2025 has reignited debate over the future of India’s power sector, with critics warning that the proposed changes could undermine public utilities, state autonomy, and affordable access to electricity. The Bill seeks sweeping reforms that would open the electricity distribution sector to private players, restructure tariffs, and strengthen the Centre’s powers over state electricity policies.
At the core of the Bill is a move to allow multiple distribution licensees to operate in the same area using the existing public-funded network. While the government presents this as a step toward “consumer choice” and competition, critics say it will enable private companies to target high-paying industrial and commercial consumers, leaving public distribution companies (DISCOMs) with loss-making rural and low-income segments. Such an arrangement, they argue, will weaken state utilities, erode cross-subsidies, and push up tariffs for ordinary consumers.
The Bill also proposes the phased removal of cross-subsidies within five years. Cross-subsidisation — where industrial and commercial users pay higher tariffs to offset lower tariffs for households and farmers — has been a key mechanism to ensure affordable electricity for weaker sections. Its removal, opponents warn, would make power unaffordable for millions of rural and low-income consumers.
The draft law introduces measures to deepen market-based trading of electricity, with expanded “open access” and smart metering systems. While such provisions are intended to enhance efficiency and transparency, trade unions and experts fear they will accelerate privatisation, job losses, and tariff volatility. Electricity, they caution, is being transformed from a public necessity into a speculative commodity.
The Bill also grants the Central Government greater authority over state regulatory commissions and renewable energy targets. Critics have described this as a serious blow to India’s federal structure. They argue that the move centralises decision-making in a sector historically managed through state-level policy and planning, and could especially strain opposition-ruled states already facing fiscal constraints.
The Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU), which has strongly opposed the Bill, called it “a direct assault on the public electricity system and the right to affordable energy.” In a statement, CITU said, “This draft is part of a wider neoliberal agenda to dismantle the integrated, socially driven electricity framework built over decades and hand over the sector to private monopolies.” The organisation warned that privatisation would lead to large-scale job losses, contractualisation, and outsourcing, even in sensitive sectors such as defence zones.
CITU has demanded the immediate withdrawal of the Draft Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2025, and urged the government to guarantee electricity as a social right rather than a commercial commodity. “We will launch nationwide campaigns and coordinated actions with other trade unions and people’s movements to demand the complete withdrawal of this anti-people Bill,” said Tapan Sen, General Secretary of CITU.
The Bill, currently open for public feedback, is expected to face strong opposition from state governments, trade unions, and consumer groups in the coming weeks.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Hindu antecedent of Muslim Jinnah: His grandfather was Lohana-Thakkar, said to be Raghuvanshi descent of Lord Ram

By RK Misra* Nearly 70 years after his death, Muhammed Ali Jinnah’s portraits continue to adorn places like Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Bombay High Court and Sabarmati Ashram in India. On the other hand, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry building’s foundation stone states that it was laid by Mahatma Gandhi in 1934.