Skip to main content

A trillion-dollar injustice: Why the US must end six decades long blockade of Cuba

By Bharat Dogra 
 
Despite decades of international condemnation and repeated United Nations resolutions, the United States continues to enforce one of the most enduring and punitive embargoes in modern history against Cuba. The measures have become so sweeping and entrenched that they are best described as a blockade rather than an embargo. This blockade has cost Cuba over a trillion dollars in lost trade and economic opportunities, while also hurting American businesses that could benefit from normal relations with the island nation.
The human cost has been even greater. Essential supplies such as food, medicine, and equipment have often been denied or delayed, creating hardships for ordinary Cubans. The country faced its most severe crisis after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when its trade network fell apart, and again during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, despite these enormous challenges, Cuba’s health indicators remain on par with those of the United States, with similar rates of infant and child mortality and a life expectancy of around 78 years. The country also continues to rank in the “high human development” category on the UN Human Development Index.
For more than six decades, this blockade has persisted with only minor, temporary relaxations. Every year for over thirty years, the UN General Assembly has overwhelmingly voted in favor of resolutions condemning the blockade as a violation of the UN Charter and international law. More than 90 percent of member nations—including the European Union, Canada, and nearly all of America’s allies—support these resolutions. Israel remains the only major nation consistently siding with Washington.
Even within the United States, several political and business leaders have opposed the policy. Former Secretary of State George P. Shultz called it “insane,” while former Senator and presidential candidate George McGovern bluntly described it as “a stupid policy.” Both Presidents Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama attempted limited normalization of relations, but their modest achievements were swiftly reversed by their successors. The Trump administration went further, tightening restrictions and deepening the suffering of ordinary Cubans.
Prominent human rights organizations—including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights—have also called for an end to the blockade. Legal experts have described it as a violation of international law. In a study published in the Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Paul A. Shenyer and Virginia Barta concluded that the blockade “constituted an illegal act” and a “flagrant violation of the contemporary standard founded on economic principles and sovereign equality between states.”
The United States has justified its stance by citing events from the early 1960s, when Cuba nationalized U.S.-owned refineries and other assets without compensation. Yet the broader context reveals that Washington had already taken hostile steps—cutting off oil supplies and refusing to process Soviet crude that Cuba had imported to keep its economy running. When the U.S. abruptly ended sugar imports, Cuba was left with little choice but to nationalize and reorient its economy.
Today, the blockade’s extraterritorial reach extends far beyond U.S. borders, punishing foreign firms that engage with Cuba and discouraging investment in vital sectors like oil exploration. The result has been lost revenue, persistent shortages, and immense hardship for an island nation striving for self-reliance. Despite this, Cuba continues to display remarkable resilience. Its agroecological farming model has earned international praise, and its medical brigades have offered humanitarian aid in over forty countries during crises and disasters.
This enduring policy of isolation and punishment serves no constructive purpose. It has failed to bring political change, undermines the credibility of U.S. foreign policy, and inflicts needless suffering on the Cuban people. After six and a half decades, it is time for Washington to heed global opinion, uphold the principles of international law, and lift the blockade—permanently.
No more. The U.S. blockade of Cuba must go away, and never return.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener of the Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Man Over Machine (Mahatma Gandhi’s Ideas for Present Times), When the Two Streams Met (Freedom Movement of India), A Day in 2071, and Planet in Peril

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Conversations from the margins: Caste, land and social justice in South Asia

By Prof K S Chalam*  Vidya Bhushan Rawat ’s three-volume body of conversational works constitutes an ambitious and largely unprecedented intellectual intervention into the study of marginalisation in South Asia . Drawing upon the method of extended dialogue, Rawat documents voices from across caste, region, ideology, and national boundaries to construct a living archive of dissent, memory, and struggle. 

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.